Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ADV vs HYFM vs ACNB vs GRWG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Banks - Regional
Specialty Retail
ADV vs HYFM vs ACNB vs GRWG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Agricultural - Machinery | Banks - Regional | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $529M | $5M | $554M | $85M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.59B | $146M | $170M | $162M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-243M | $-65M | $37M | $-24M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 10.2% | 73.7% | 26.8% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | -35.8% | 27.3% | -15.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.9x | — |
| Total Debt | $13M | $170M | $329M | $29M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $241M | $26M | $21M | $30M |
ADV vs HYFM vs ACNB vs GRWG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advantage Solutions… (ADV) | 100 | 12.1 | -87.9% |
| Hydrofarm Holdings … (HYFM) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| ACNB Corporation (ACNB) | 100 | 214.2 | +114.2% |
| GrowGeneration Corp. (GRWG) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADV vs HYFM vs ACNB vs GRWG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth -0.7%, EPS growth 31.4%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.0%
- Better valuation composite
HYFM is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 75.8%, current ratio 2.72x
- Beta 0.73, current ratio 2.72x
ACNB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 2.6%
- 191.2% 10Y total return vs GRWG's -75.7%
- 28.9% NII/revenue growth vs HYFM's -16.0%
- 21.7% margin vs HYFM's -44.5%
GRWG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.9% NII/revenue growth vs HYFM's -16.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.7% margin vs HYFM's -44.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs GRWG's 1.15 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.0% vs HYFM's -75.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.1% ROA vs HYFM's -16.3%, ROIC 5.3% vs -9.6% |
ADV vs HYFM vs ACNB vs GRWG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ADV vs HYFM vs ACNB vs GRWG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACNB leads in 5 of 6 categories
ADV leads 0 • HYFM leads 0 • GRWG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACNB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADV is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.6B annually — 24.5x HYFM's $146M. ACNB is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HYFM's -44.5%. On growth, ADV holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $146M | $170M | $162M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $96M | -$23M | $53M | -$14M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$243M | -$65M | $37M | -$24M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $62M | -$8M | $51M | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +10.2% | +73.7% | +26.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -35.8% | +27.3% | -15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | -44.5% | +21.7% | -14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -5.7% | +30.9% | -6.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | -33.3% | — | +1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.2% | -22.7% | +35.1% | +69.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ADV and HYFM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ADV's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ACNB's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $529M | $5M | $554M | $85M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $301M | $148M | $863M | $84M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.27x | -0.07x | 14.87x | -3.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.93x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.34x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.98x | — | 16.22x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 0.03x | 3.25x | 0.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.93x | 0.02x | 1.31x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.61x | — | 10.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACNB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACNB delivers a 9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-40 for ADV. ADV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACNB's 0.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ADV scores 6/9 vs HYFM's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.2% | -32.3% | +9.2% | -22.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.6% | -16.3% | +1.1% | -15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | -9.6% | +5.3% | -16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.1% | -12.1% | +2.5% | -18.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.76x | 0.78x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$228M | $143M | $308M | -$929,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $241M | $26M | $21M | $30M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $170M | $329M | $29M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.80x | -3.77x | 1.16x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACNB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACNB five years ago would be worth $20,724 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17 for HYFM. Over the past 12 months, ACNB leads with a +28.0% total return vs HYFM's -75.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACNB at 26.6% vs HYFM's -56.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +94.9% | -35.6% | +14.1% | -7.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.3% | -75.5% | +28.0% | +15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.3% | -92.0% | +103.0% | -62.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.8% | -99.8% | +107.2% | -96.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.7% | -99.8% | +191.2% | -75.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.2% | -56.9% | +26.6% | -27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
ACNB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACNB is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GRWG's 1.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACNB currently trades 99.3% from its 52-week high vs HYFM's 21.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.73x | 0.68x | 1.15x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.75 | $4.78 | $53.91 | $2.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.82 | $0.81 | $40.15 | $0.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.0% | +21.5% | +99.3% | +59.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 78.2 | 48.2 | 62.0 | 66.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 73K | 41K | 62K | 482K |
Analyst Outlook
ACNB leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADV as "Hold", ACNB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for ACNB (target: $58) vs -52.9% for ADV (target: $19). ACNB is the only dividend payer here at 2.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | — | $58.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 8 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.40 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% |
ACNB leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
ADV vs HYFM vs ACNB vs GRWG: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADV or HYFM or ACNB or GRWG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACNB Corporation (ACNB) is the stronger pick with 28.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). ACNB Corporation (ACNB) offers the better valuation at 14. 9x trailing P/E (9. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACNB Corporation (ACNB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ADV or HYFM or ACNB or GRWG?
Over the past 5 years, ACNB Corporation (ACNB) delivered a total return of +107.
2%, compared to -99. 8% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACNB returned +191. 2% versus HYFM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ADV or HYFM or ACNB or GRWG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACNB Corporation (ACNB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus GrowGeneration Corp. 's 1. 15β — meaning GRWG is approximately 71% more volatile than ACNB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 78% for ACNB Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ADV or HYFM or ACNB or GRWG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACNB Corporation (ACNB) is pulling ahead at 28.
9% versus -16. 0% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GrowGeneration Corp. grew EPS 51. 2% year-over-year, compared to -3. 5% for ACNB Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADV leads at -1. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ADV or HYFM or ACNB or GRWG?
ACNB Corporation (ACNB) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -35. 1% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACNB leads at 27. 3% versus -27. 4% for HYFM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACNB leads at 73. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is ADV or HYFM or ACNB or GRWG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACNB: 8.
3% to $58. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — ADV or HYFM or ACNB or GRWG?
In this comparison, ACNB (2.
6% yield) pays a dividend. ADV, HYFM, GRWG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is ADV or HYFM or ACNB or GRWG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ACNB Corporation (ACNB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), 2. 6% yield, +191. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACNB: +191. 2%, GRWG: -75. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between ADV and HYFM and ACNB and GRWG?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADV (Communication Services) and HYFM (Industrials) and ACNB (Financial Services) and GRWG (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYFM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACNB is a small-cap high-growth stock; GRWG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ACNB pays a dividend while ADV, HYFM, GRWG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.