Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ADV vs OMC vs IPG vs WPP vs CODA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Advertising Agencies
Advertising Agencies
Aerospace & Defense
ADV vs OMC vs IPG vs WPP vs CODA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies | Advertising Agencies | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $583M | $23.87B | $8.93B | $4.05B | $134M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.59B | $19.82B | $10.21B | $29.03B | $28M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-243M | $63M | $552M | $584M | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 14.0% | 16.8% | 18.2% | 16.3% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 13.7% | 9.7% | 6.7% | 17.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.2x | 7.8x | 7.5x | 22.5x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $12.78B | $4.25B | $6.35B | $395K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $241M | $6.88B | $2.19B | $2.64B | $29M |
ADV vs OMC vs IPG vs WPP vs CODA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advantage Solutions… (ADV) | 100 | 16.5 | -83.5% |
| Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) | 100 | 140.4 | +40.4% |
| The Interpublic Gro… (IPG) | 100 | 150.0 | +50.0% |
| WPP plc (WPP) | 100 | 49.6 | -50.4% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 212.5 | +112.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADV vs OMC vs IPG vs WPP vs CODA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
OMC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, Low D/E 97.9%, current ratio 0.93x
- Lower P/E (7.2x vs 22.5x)
- Beta 0.60 vs WPP's 1.08, lower leverage
IPG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.65, yield 5.4%
- PEG 4.51 vs CODA's 5.24
- Beta 0.65, yield 5.4%, current ratio 1.09x
- 5.4% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs WPP's 14.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, WPP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CODA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs IPG's 45.7%
- 30.7% revenue growth vs IPG's -1.8%
- 14.8% margin vs ADV's -6.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.7% revenue growth vs IPG's -1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.2x vs 22.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs ADV's -6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.60 vs WPP's 1.08, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.4% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs WPP's 14.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs WPP's -46.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs ADV's -8.6%, ROIC 11.2% vs -7.3% |
ADV vs OMC vs IPG vs WPP vs CODA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ADV vs OMC vs IPG vs WPP vs CODA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 1 of 6 categories
WPP leads 1 • IPG leads 1 • OMC leads 1 • ADV leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WPP is the larger business by revenue, generating $29.0B annually — 1034.4x CODA's $28M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADV's -6.8%. On growth, OMC holds the edge at +69.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $19.8B | $10.2B | $29.0B | $28M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $96M | $3.1B | $1.2B | $2.6B | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$243M | $63M | $552M | $584M | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $122M | $3.0B | $807M | $1.7B | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +14.0% | +16.8% | +18.2% | +16.3% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +13.7% | +9.7% | +6.7% | +17.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.8% | +0.3% | +5.4% | +2.0% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +15.1% | +7.9% | +5.9% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.8% | +69.2% | -5.1% | -7.8% | +28.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.2% | +40.7% | +5.4% | -78.9% | +3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
WPP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.6x trailing earnings, WPP trades at a 83% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CODA offers better value at 7.51x vs IPG's 7.78x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $583M | $23.9B | $8.9B | $4.0B | $134M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $355M | $29.8B | $11.0B | $9.1B | $106M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.54x | -284.89x | 13.43x | 5.63x | 32.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.24x | 7.78x | 7.48x | 22.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 7.78x | — | 7.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.69x | 10.40x | 7.52x | 3.68x | 17.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 1.38x | 0.83x | 0.20x | 5.05x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.04x | 1.21x | 2.37x | 0.81x | 2.30x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.59x | 8.56x | 9.77x | 2.54x | 22.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WPP delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-40 for ADV. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WPP's 1.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IPG scores 8/9 vs OMC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -40.2% | +0.7% | +14.6% | +17.1% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.6% | +0.2% | +3.2% | +2.5% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.3% | +14.5% | +14.7% | +12.5% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.1% | +13.5% | +13.7% | +13.0% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.98x | 1.09x | 1.70x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$228M | $5.9B | $2.1B | $3.7B | -$28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $241M | $6.9B | $2.2B | $2.6B | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $12.8B | $4.3B | $6.3B | $394,932 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.80x | 2.51x | 4.90x | 2.37x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ADV and CODA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,371 for ADV. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs WPP's -46.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADV at 11.3% vs WPP's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +117.7% | -4.4% | — | -18.2% | +25.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.7% | +5.3% | +1.0% | -46.1% | +78.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +37.8% | -7.0% | -23.0% | -54.3% | +34.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.3% | +7.2% | -10.1% | -57.1% | +49.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.9% | +23.5% | +45.7% | -59.0% | +844.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.3% | -2.4% | -8.4% | -23.0% | +10.4% |
Risk & Volatility
OMC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OMC is the less volatile stock with a 0.60 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WPP's 1.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OMC currently trades 88.2% from its 52-week high vs WPP's 45.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | 0.60x | 0.65x | 1.08x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.75 | $87.17 | $28.42 | $40.95 | $17.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.82 | $66.33 | $22.55 | $14.81 | $5.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.7% | +88.2% | +86.5% | +45.8% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.4 | 50.1 | 45.1 | 63.3 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 72K | 4.3M | 81.3M | 616K | 256K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IPG and WPP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ADV as "Hold", OMC as "Hold", IPG as "Hold", WPP as "Hold", CODA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.8% upside for IPG (target: $37) vs -57.8% for ADV (target: $19). For income investors, WPP offers the higher dividend yield at 14.05% vs OMC's 3.49%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.75 | $93.67 | $36.57 | — | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 34 | 34 | 13 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.5% | +5.4% | +14.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 16 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.68 | $1.31 | $1.94 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +3.0% | +2.6% | +2.8% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). WPP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ADV vs OMC vs IPG vs WPP vs CODA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the stronger pick with 30. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 8% for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG). WPP plc (WPP) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA?
On trailing P/E, WPP plc (WPP) is the cheapest at 5.
6x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, Omnicom Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. wins at 4. 51x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 24x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -86. 3% for Advantage Solutions Inc. (ADV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus ADV's -82. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 60β versus WPP plc's 1. 08β — meaning WPP is approximately 79% more volatile than OMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 170% for WPP plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is pulling ahead at 30. 7% versus -1. 8% for The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WPP plc grew EPS 390. 0% year-over-year, compared to -103. 6% for Omnicom Group Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, OMC leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -6. 4% for Advantage Solutions Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -3. 6% for ADV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODA leads at 66. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (IPG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 51x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 24x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Omnicom Group Inc. (OMC) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPG: 48. 8% to $36. 57.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA?
In this comparison, WPP (14.
0% yield), IPG (5. 4% yield), OMC (3. 5% yield) pay a dividend. ADV, CODA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ADV or OMC or IPG or WPP or CODA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Omnicom Group Inc.
(OMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 60), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (OMC: +23. 5%, ADV: -82. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADV and OMC and IPG and WPP and CODA?
These companies operate in different sectors (ADV (Communication Services) and OMC (Communication Services) and IPG (Communication Services) and WPP (Communication Services) and CODA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ADV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OMC is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; IPG is a small-cap deep-value stock; WPP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock. OMC, IPG, WPP pay a dividend while ADV, CODA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 34%
- Dividend Yield > 1.3%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.