Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ADVM vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
ADVM vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $96M | $1712.35T | $73.68B | $5.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $14.92B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-204M | $-168M | $4.42B | $153M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | — | 84.5% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | -139.2% | — | 24.3% | 12.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 15.3x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $92M | $22M | $2.71B | $70M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $61M | $194M | $3.12B | $1.12B |
ADVM vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adverum Biotechnolo… (ADVM) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 27.0 | -73.0% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 180.8 | +80.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ADVM vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ADVM plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
DBVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +110.4% vs ALKS's +16.5%
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 0.5%
- Rev growth 1.0%, EPS growth 8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- 90.0% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 8.7%, current ratio 4.13x
ALKS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.0% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs ADVM's -130.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs DBVT's 1.26, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs ALKS's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs ADVM's -282.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs -124.2% |
ADVM vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ADVM vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 2 • DBVT leads 1 • ADVM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ADVM's -130.9%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $14.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$205M | -$112M | $4.2B | $212M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$204M | -$168M | $4.4B | $153M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$138M | -$151M | $4.2B | $392M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | — | +84.5% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -139.2% | — | +24.3% | +12.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -130.9% | — | +29.6% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -92.8% | — | +27.9% | +25.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — | +19.0% | +28.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.2% | +91.5% | -7.2% | -4.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ALKS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.1x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 31% valuation discount to ALKS's 24.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALKS's 17.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 17.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $96M | $1712.35T | $73.7B | $5.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $127M | $1712.35T | $73.3B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.66x | -0.76x | 17.09x | 24.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 15.35x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.70x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.78x | 17.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 96.26x | — | 5.14x | 4.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.22x | 0.66x | 2.46x | 3.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 18.06x | 12.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-190 for ADVM. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ADVM's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs ADVM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -189.8% | -130.2% | +14.3% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.8% | -89.0% | +11.1% | +5.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -124.2% | — | +8.9% | +18.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -95.1% | -145.7% | +10.2% | +14.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.30x | 0.13x | 0.09x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | -$172M | -$412M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $61M | $194M | $3.1B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $92M | $22M | $2.7B | $70M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 108.44x | 32.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DBVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,153 for ADVM. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs ALKS's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs ADVM's -18.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +4.9% | -8.5% | +25.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.3% | +110.4% | +27.1% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -46.5% | +19.7% | -5.1% | +14.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.5% | -69.1% | +43.6% | +60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.2% | -87.0% | +90.0% | -11.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -18.8% | +6.2% | -1.7% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REGN and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
REGN is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs ADVM's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 1.26x | 0.81x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.75 | $26.18 | $821.11 | $36.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.78 | $7.53 | $476.49 | $25.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.8% | +76.3% | +86.4% | +96.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.2 | 48.1 | 44.9 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 252K | 631K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
REGN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", REGN as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 22.1% for REGN (target: $866). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.48% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $865.68 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 48 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.41 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +5.4% | +0.5% |
REGN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). ALKS leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
ADVM vs DBVT vs REGN vs ALKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the stronger pick with 1. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -72. 2% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. (ADVM). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 17. 1x trailing P/E (15. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 17. 1x versus Alkermes plc at 24. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -88. 5% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. (ADVM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: REGN returned +90. 0% versus ADVM's -89. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 56% more volatile than REGN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 130% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is pulling ahead at 1. 0% versus -72. 2% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. (ADVM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 8. 2% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -130. 9% for Adverum Biotechnologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -139. 2% for ADVM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ADVM leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131.
8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ADVM, DBVT, ALKS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ADVM or DBVT or REGN or ALKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +90. 0%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ADVM and DBVT and REGN and ALKS?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ADVM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ALKS is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.