Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AEON vs ALNY vs KO vs JPM vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Banks - Diversified
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
AEON vs ALNY vs KO vs JPM vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Banks - Diversified | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $9M | $37.74B | $355.61B | $896.00B | $30.79B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $4.29B | $49.28B | $280.33B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $577M | $13.70B | $57.05B | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | — | 80.9% | 61.7% | 60.0% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.5% | 29.3% | 25.9% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.7x | 25.3x | 14.4x | 14.2x |
| Total Debt | $36M | $1.28B | $45.49B | $942.38B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $1.66B | $10.27B | $343.34B | $1.98B |
AEON vs ALNY vs KO vs JPM vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AEON Biopharma, Inc. (AEON) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 144.8 | +44.8% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 133.4 | +33.4% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 203.0 | +103.0% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AEON vs ALNY vs KO vs JPM vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AEON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.11 vs IQV's 1.16
ALNY ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.60, current ratio 2.76x
- Beta 0.60, current ratio 2.76x
- 65.2% revenue growth vs AEON's -135.5%
KO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 27.8% margin vs IQV's 8.3%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- 13.1% ROA vs AEON's -7.0%
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 465.8% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 366.4%
- +21.8% vs AEON's -18.1%
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.35 vs KO's 2.26
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.35 vs 2.26
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs AEON's -135.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 25.3x), PEG 0.35 vs 2.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs IQV's 8.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.11 vs IQV's 1.16 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.8% vs AEON's -18.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs AEON's -7.0% |
AEON vs ALNY vs KO vs JPM vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AEON vs ALNY vs KO vs JPM vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
ALNY leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • JPM leads 1 • AEON leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and AEON operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IQV's 8.3%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $4.3B | $49.3B | $280.3B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$18M | $677M | $15.5B | $81.4B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | $577M | $13.7B | $57.0B | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $641M | $12.6B | $100.9B | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +80.9% | +61.7% | +60.0% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +17.5% | +29.3% | +25.9% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.5% | +27.8% | +20.4% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.0% | +25.5% | +36.0% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +96.4% | +12.1% | — | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -142.5% | +4.4% | +18.2% | +16.0% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.0x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 87% valuation discount to ALNY's 121.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs KO's 2.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $37.7B | $355.6B | $896.0B | $30.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $41M | $37.4B | $390.8B | $1.50T | $45.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.18x | 121.39x | 27.18x | 16.00x | 23.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.74x | 25.27x | 14.40x | 14.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | 0.90x | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 67.05x | 26.39x | 18.36x | 13.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 10.16x | 7.42x | 3.20x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 48.27x | 10.40x | 2.47x | 4.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 81.09x | 67.15x | 8.88x | 15.01x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALNY delivers a 98.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $98 in annual profit, vs $16 for JPM. KO carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs AEON's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +98.3% | +41.1% | +15.9% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.0% | +11.8% | +13.1% | +1.3% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +33.4% | +15.8% | +4.5% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +15.3% | +17.3% | +8.9% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.62x | 1.33x | 2.60x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $33M | -$379M | $35.2B | $599.0B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $1.7B | $10.3B | $343.3B | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $36M | $1.3B | $45.5B | $942.4B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.02x | 10.70x | 0.74x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $21,820 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11 for AEON. Over the past 12 months, JPM leads with a +21.8% total return vs AEON's -18.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.6% vs AEON's -89.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -34.2% | -29.3% | +20.3% | -0.5% | -19.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.1% | -7.2% | +17.2% | +21.8% | +14.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +46.5% | +47.0% | +138.2% | -14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +69.7% | +65.6% | +118.2% | -25.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +366.4% | +121.1% | +465.8% | +177.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -89.7% | +13.6% | +13.7% | +33.6% | -5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IQV's 1.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs AEON's 50.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.11x | 0.60x | -0.20x | 0.94x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.45 | $495.55 | $84.04 | $337.25 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.63 | $281.76 | $65.35 | $262.71 | $153.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +50.4% | +57.1% | +98.3% | +95.1% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.7 | 44.0 | 60.6 | 59.1 | 54.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 85K | 1.0M | 12.7M | 7.0M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALNY as "Buy", KO as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.6% upside for ALNY (target: $446) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.46% vs JPM's 1.86%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $445.67 | $86.13 | $339.75 | $222.22 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 | 48 | 61 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | +1.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 56 | 15 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | $5.95 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | +3.9% | +4.0% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). ALNY leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
AEON vs ALNY vs KO vs JPM vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 0x trailing P/E (14. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (ALNY) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 0x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 121. 4x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -99. 9% for AEON Biopharma, Inc. (AEON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus AEON's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. 's 1. 16β — meaning IQV is approximately -681% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -105. 4% for AEON Biopharma, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 0. 0% for AEON Biopharma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 0. 0% for AEON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALNY leads at 81. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) trades at 14. 2x forward P/E versus 37. 7x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 23. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALNY: 57. 6% to $445. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AEON, ALNY, IQV do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AEON or ALNY or KO or JPM or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, IQV: +177. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AEON and ALNY and KO and JPM and IQV?
These companies operate in different sectors (AEON (Healthcare) and ALNY (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and JPM (Financial Services) and IQV (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AEON is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KO, JPM pay a dividend while AEON, ALNY, IQV do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.