Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AFJK vs GDRX vs HIMS vs TDOC vs AMWL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AFJK
Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd

Shell Companies

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$261M
5Y Perf.+319.2%
GDRX
GoodRx Holdings, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$973M
5Y Perf.-51.3%
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.63B
5Y Perf.+229.5%
TDOC
Teladoc Health, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.26B
5Y Perf.-62.7%
AMWL
American Well Corporation

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$129M
5Y Perf.-62.0%

AFJK vs GDRX vs HIMS vs TDOC vs AMWL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AFJK logoAFJK
GDRX logoGDRX
HIMS logoHIMS
TDOC logoTDOC
AMWL logoAMWL
IndustryShell CompaniesMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesMedical - Equipment & ServicesMedical - Healthcare Information ServicesMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$261M$973M$6.63B$1.26B$129M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$788M$2.35B$2.51B$182M
Net Income (TTM)$1M$29M$128M$-171M$-88M
Gross Margin81.0%69.7%65.6%38.7%
Operating Margin12.4%4.6%-7.6%-50.6%
Forward P/E251.0x9.4x58.3x
Total Debt$2M$60M$1.12B$1.04B$5M
Cash & Equiv.$3K$262M$229M$781M$182M

AFJK vs GDRX vs HIMS vs TDOC vs AMWLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AFJK
GDRX
HIMS
TDOC
AMWL
StockJan 24May 26Return
Aimei Health Techno… (AFJK)100419.2+319.2%
GoodRx Holdings, In… (GDRX)10048.7-51.3%
Hims & Hers Health,… (HIMS)100329.5+229.5%
Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC)10037.3-62.7%
American Well Corpo… (AMWL)10038.0-62.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AFJK vs GDRX vs HIMS vs TDOC vs AMWL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: HIMS leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. GDRX also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AFJK
Aimei Health Technology Co., Ltd
The Banking Pick

AFJK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • beta 0.23
  • 320.4% 10Y total return vs HIMS's 161.9%
  • Beta 0.23 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
  • +288.0% vs HIMS's -51.0%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
GDRX
GoodRx Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

GDRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
HIMS
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
The Growth Play

HIMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 59.0%, EPS growth -3.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 64.5%
  • 59.0% revenue growth vs AFJK's -57.2%
  • 5.5% margin vs AMWL's -48.2%
  • 6.0% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -95.1%
Best for: growth exposure
TDOC
Teladoc Health, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

TDOC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
AMWL
American Well Corporation
The Defensive Pick

AMWL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 1.8%, current ratio 3.37x
  • Beta 1.47, current ratio 3.37x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthHIMS logoHIMS59.0% revenue growth vs AFJK's -57.2%
ValueGDRX logoGDRXBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsHIMS logoHIMS5.5% margin vs AMWL's -48.2%
Stability / SafetyAFJK logoAFJKBeta 0.23 vs HIMS's 2.40, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AFJK logoAFJK+288.0% vs HIMS's -51.0%
Efficiency (ROA)HIMS logoHIMS6.0% ROA vs AMWL's -25.1%, ROIC 10.7% vs -95.1%

AFJK vs GDRX vs HIMS vs TDOC vs AMWL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AFJKAimei Health Technology Co., Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

GDRXGoodRx Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Prescription Transactions Revenue
84.3%$578M
Subscription Revenue
12.6%$87M
Other Revenue
3.1%$21M
HIMSHims & Hers Health, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TDOCTeladoc Health, Inc.
FY 2025
Other
100.0%$438M
AMWLAmerican Well Corporation
FY 2025
Platform Subscription
53.1%$132M
Visits
37.8%$94M
Others
9.1%$23M

AFJK vs GDRX vs HIMS vs TDOC vs AMWL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGDRXLAGGINGAMWL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GDRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

TDOC and AFJK operate at a comparable scale, with $2.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. HIMS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMWL's -48.2%. On growth, HIMS holds the edge at +28.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$788M$2.3B$2.5B$182M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$835,759$184M$164M$42M-$59M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1M$29M$128M-$171M-$88M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$565,100$132M$73M$251M-$42M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+81.0%+69.7%+65.6%+38.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+12.4%+4.6%-7.6%-50.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.7%+5.5%-6.8%-48.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.7%+3.1%+10.0%-22.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.4%+28.4%-2.5%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-59.1%-1.3%-27.3%+32.1%+44.5%
GDRX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TDOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 33.3x trailing earnings, GDRX trades at a 87% valuation discount to AFJK's 251.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GDRX's 4.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than HIMS's 42.7x.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
Market CapShares × price$261M$973M$6.6B$1.3B$129M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$263M$771M$7.5B$1.5B-$48M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS251.03x33.29x50.32x-6.11x-1.30x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.9.40x58.29x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.01x42.68x15.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.22x2.82x0.50x0.52x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share21.48x1.65x12.25x0.89x0.50x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.92x89.61x4.40x
TDOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GDRX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HIMS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-33 for AMWL. AMWL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HIMS's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GDRX scores 6/9 vs AFJK's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+3.2%+4.8%+23.7%-12.4%-33.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.9%+1.9%+6.0%-5.9%-25.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.5%+13.0%+10.7%-11.5%-95.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-2.0%+8.8%+10.9%-10.0%-36.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–926466
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.10x2.07x0.75x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2M-$202M$892M$259M-$178M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2,929$262M$229M$781M$182M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2M$60M$1.1B$1.0B$5M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.61x-8.76x-239.18x
GDRX leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AFJK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AFJK five years ago would be worth $42,044 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $278 for AMWL. Over the past 12 months, AFJK leads with a +288.0% total return vs HIMS's -51.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AFJK at 61.4% vs AMWL's -42.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-43.7%+3.3%-23.2%-1.3%+59.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+288.0%-25.1%-51.0%+1.5%+14.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%-38.4%+116.6%-73.3%-80.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%-91.8%+137.6%-95.4%-97.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+320.4%-94.4%+161.9%-41.1%-98.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+61.4%-14.9%+29.4%-35.6%-42.2%
AFJK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AFJK and AMWL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AFJK is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HIMS's 2.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMWL currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs AFJK's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.32x1.50x2.48x1.89x1.31x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$130.37$5.81$70.43$9.77$9.15
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$6.75$1.77$13.74$4.40$3.71
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.7%+48.9%+36.4%+71.2%+84.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.266.154.574.167.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded21K2.3M34.9M5.5M59K
Evenly matched — AFJK and AMWL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: GDRX as "Hold", HIMS as "Hold", TDOC as "Hold", AMWL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for GDRX (target: $3) vs -25.8% for AMWL (target: $6).

MetricAFJK logoAFJKAimei Health Tech…GDRX logoGDRXGoodRx Holdings, …HIMS logoHIMSHims & Hers Healt…TDOC logoTDOCTeladoc Health, I…AMWL logoAMWLAmerican Well Cor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.25$26.20$7.58$5.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts24194215
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+21.3%+1.4%0.0%+0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

GDRX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TDOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallGoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AFJK vs GDRX vs HIMS vs TDOC vs AMWL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the stronger pick with 59. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX) offers the better valuation at 33. 3x trailing P/E (9. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GoodRx Holdings, Inc. (GDRX) a "Hold" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL?

On trailing P/E, GoodRx Holdings, Inc.

(GDRX) is the cheapest at 33. 3x versus Aimei Health Technology Co. , Ltd at 251. 0x. On forward P/E, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL?

Over the past 5 years, Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) delivered a total return of +320. 4%, compared to -97. 2% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AFJK returned +320. 4% versus AMWL's -98. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Hims & Hers Health, Inc. 's 2. 48β — meaning HIMS is approximately 672% more volatile than AFJK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Well Corporation (AMWL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is pulling ahead at 59. 0% versus -2. 0% for American Well Corporation (AMWL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GoodRx Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 104. 1% year-over-year, compared to -39. 3% for Aimei Health Technology Co. , Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, HIMS leads at 64. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL?

Hims & Hers Health, Inc.

(HIMS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 5% net margin versus -38. 4% for American Well Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GDRX leads at 13. 4% versus -42. 2% for AMWL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GDRX leads at 82. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, GoodRx Holdings, Inc.

(GDRX) trades at 9. 4x forward P/E versus 58. 3x for Hims & Hers Health, Inc. — 48. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GDRX: 14. 4% to $3. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AFJK or GDRX or HIMS or TDOC or AMWL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Aimei Health Technology Co.

, Ltd (AFJK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +320. 4% 10Y return). Teladoc Health, Inc. (TDOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AFJK: +320. 4%, TDOC: -38. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AFJK and GDRX and HIMS and TDOC and AMWL?

These companies operate in different sectors (AFJK (Financial Services) and GDRX (Healthcare) and HIMS (Healthcare) and TDOC (Healthcare) and AMWL (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AFJK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GDRX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HIMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; TDOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMWL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AFJK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GDRX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 48%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HIMS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TDOC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMWL

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AFJK and GDRX and HIMS and TDOC and AMWL on the metrics below

P/E Ratio<
x
(AFJK: 251.0x · GDRX: 33.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.