Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AGCC vs WDFC vs KR vs STZ vs BUD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals - Specialty
Grocery Stores
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Beverages - Alcoholic
AGCC vs WDFC vs KR vs STZ vs BUD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Chemicals - Specialty | Grocery Stores | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Beverages - Alcoholic |
| Market Cap | $383M | $4.09B | $40.89B | $24.71B | $137.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3M | $621M | $147.64B | $9.38B | $119.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $779K | $90M | $1.02B | $1.11B | $12.57B |
| Gross Margin | 49.9% | 55.4% | 22.3% | 52.0% | 55.2% |
| Operating Margin | 40.0% | 16.4% | 1.3% | 34.5% | 31.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 34.2x | 12.3x | 12.0x | 18.7x |
| Total Debt | $140K | $98M | $24.68B | $12.11B | $72.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $55K | $58M | $3.33B | $68M | $11.17B |
AGCC vs WDFC vs KR vs STZ vs BUD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| WD-40 Company (WDFC) | 100 | 106.7 | +6.7% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 198.1 | +98.1% |
| Constellation Brand… (STZ) | 100 | 82.5 | -17.5% |
| Anheuser-Busch InBe… (BUD) | 100 | 170.2 | +70.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGCC vs WDFC vs KR vs STZ vs BUD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGCC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 218.3% 10Y total return vs KR's 108.9%
- 186.0% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4%
- 30.7% margin vs KR's 0.7%
- +218.3% vs STZ's -22.8%
WDFC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 5.0%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 2.79x
- Beta 0.19, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.79x
KR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
STZ is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 18.7x)
- 2.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WDFC's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, BUD doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 186.0% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 18.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs AGCC's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WDFC's 1.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +218.3% vs STZ's -22.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.6% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 47.6% vs 5.0% |
AGCC vs WDFC vs KR vs STZ vs BUD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AGCC vs WDFC vs KR vs STZ vs BUD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AGCC leads in 2 of 6 categories
STZ leads 1 • WDFC leads 0 • KR leads 0 • BUD leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AGCC and KR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KR is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.6B annually — 58178.5x AGCC's $3M. AGCC is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KR's 0.7%. On growth, KR holds the edge at +1.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3M | $621M | $147.6B | $9.4B | $119.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $111M | $5.5B | $3.7B | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $90M | $1.0B | $1.1B | $12.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $78M | $3.5B | $1.8B | $32.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.9% | +55.4% | +22.3% | +52.0% | +55.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +40.0% | +16.4% | +1.3% | +34.5% | +31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.7% | +14.4% | +0.7% | +11.8% | +10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | +12.6% | +2.4% | +18.8% | +26.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.6% | +1.2% | -9.8% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.9% | +50.0% | -15.0% | +32.3% |
Valuation Metrics
STZ leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.9x trailing earnings, BUD trades at a 33% valuation discount to KR's 42.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, STZ's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AGCC's 372.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $383M | $4.1B | $40.9B | $24.7B | $137.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $383M | $4.1B | $62.2B | $36.8B | $198.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 30.59x | 41.96x | -316.73x | 27.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 34.17x | 12.34x | 12.05x | 18.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.50x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 372.70x | 36.85x | 10.71x | 9.04x | 9.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 150.85x | 6.59x | 0.28x | 2.42x | 2.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.36x | 7.13x | 3.63x | 1.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 49.01x | 12.21x | 12.75x | 12.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCC leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGCC delivers a 50.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $13 for KR. AGCC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KR's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BUD scores 9/9 vs STZ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +50.1% | +33.9% | +13.0% | +13.9% | +13.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.6% | +19.5% | +2.0% | +5.1% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +47.6% | +26.2% | +5.0% | +13.0% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +61.7% | +28.9% | +5.5% | +18.0% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.36x | 4.16x | 1.70x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $85,336 | $40M | $21.3B | $12.0B | $61.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $54,752 | $58M | $3.3B | $68M | $11.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $140,088 | $98M | $24.7B | $12.1B | $72.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 582.76x | 32.08x | 2.59x | 5.47x | 2.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGCC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGCC five years ago would be worth $31,835 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,995 for STZ. Over the past 12 months, AGCC leads with a +218.3% total return vs STZ's -22.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGCC at 47.1% vs STZ's -12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +84.0% | +5.1% | +3.2% | +2.4% | +27.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +218.3% | -12.1% | -4.4% | -22.8% | +23.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.3% | +12.0% | +39.0% | -32.2% | +36.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.3% | -7.4% | +91.6% | -30.0% | +14.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.3% | +114.5% | +108.9% | +7.3% | -23.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +47.1% | +3.9% | +11.6% | -12.2% | +10.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KR and BUD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.65 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGCC's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUD currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs STZ's 72.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.47x | 0.19x | -0.65x | 0.28x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $25.73 | $253.24 | $76.58 | $196.91 | $82.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.66 | $175.38 | $58.60 | $126.45 | $56.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +80.8% | +84.4% | +72.4% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 41.9 | 35.8 | 34.6 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 174K | 5.5M | 1.8M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WDFC and STZ each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WDFC as "Hold", KR as "Buy", STZ as "Buy", BUD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.6% upside for WDFC (target: $300) vs 11.5% for BUD (target: $89). For income investors, STZ offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs BUD's 1.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $300.00 | $74.75 | $175.70 | $89.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 44 | 46 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.8% | +2.1% | +2.8% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 22 | 21 | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.70 | $1.35 | $4.03 | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +6.6% | +4.5% | +0.7% |
AGCC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). STZ leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
AGCC vs WDFC vs KR vs STZ vs BUD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) is the stronger pick with 186.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) offers the better valuation at 27. 9x trailing P/E (18. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Kroger Co. (KR) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD?
On trailing P/E, Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (BUD) is the cheapest at 27.
9x versus The Kroger Co. at 42. 0x. On forward P/E, Constellation Brands, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD?
Over the past 5 years, Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) delivered a total return of +218.
3%, compared to -30. 0% for Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGCC returned +218. 3% versus BUD's -23. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 65β versus Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd's 1. 47β — meaning AGCC is approximately -326% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 4% for The Kroger Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) is pulling ahead at 186.
0% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WD-40 Company grew EPS 30. 9% year-over-year, compared to -104. 8% for Constellation Brands, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WDFC leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD?
Agencia Comercial Spirits Ltd (AGCC) is the more profitable company, earning 30.
7% net margin versus -0. 8% for Constellation Brands, Inc. — meaning it keeps 30. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGCC leads at 40. 0% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BUD leads at 55. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Constellation Brands, Inc.
(STZ) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 34. 2x for WD-40 Company — 22. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WDFC: 46. 6% to $300. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD?
In this comparison, STZ (2.
8% yield), KR (2. 1% yield), WDFC (1. 8% yield), BUD (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. AGCC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AGCC or WDFC or KR or STZ or BUD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 65), 2. 1% yield, +108. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +108. 9%, AGCC: +218. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGCC and WDFC and KR and STZ and BUD?
These companies operate in different sectors (AGCC (Consumer Defensive) and WDFC (Basic Materials) and KR (Consumer Defensive) and STZ (Consumer Defensive) and BUD (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AGCC is a small-cap high-growth stock; WDFC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; STZ is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BUD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WDFC, KR, STZ, BUD pay a dividend while AGCC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.