AGM vs DE vs CNH vs AGCO vs LNN

For growth investors, Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is the stronger pick with 11.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the cheapest at 11.

0x versus Deere & Company at 31. 4x. On forward P/E, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation wins at 0. 65x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) delivered a total return of +102.

2%, compared to -30. 3% for Lindsay Corporation (LNN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DE returned +671. 0% versus LNN's +80. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Deere & Company (DE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

56β versus CNH Industrial N. V. 's 1. 15β — meaning CNH is approximately 105% more volatile than DE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lindsay Corporation (LNN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 18% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lindsay Corporation (LNN) is pulling ahead at 11.

4% versus -18. 9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGCO Corporation grew EPS 271. 4% year-over-year, compared to -58. 6% for CNH Industrial N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DE leads at -3. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

7% net margin versus 2. 8% for CNH Industrial N. V. — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGM leads at 19. 4% versus 6. 9% for AGCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 65x versus Deere & Company's 1. 99x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 32. 5x for Deere & Company — 22. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGM: 27. 5% to $233. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 1. 0% for AGCO Corporation (AGCO).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

56), 1. 1% yield, +671. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +671. 0%, CNH: +87. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AGM (Financial Services) and DE (Industrials) and CNH (Industrials) and AGCO (Industrials) and LNN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AGM is a small-cap deep-value stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CNH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AGCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; LNN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.