Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AGM vs PMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
AGM vs PMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $1.95B | $960M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.32B | $957M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $210M | $132M |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 35.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 7.1x |
| Total Debt | $30.82B | $19.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $931M | $272M |
AGM vs PMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Agricultura… (AGM) | 100 | 279.0 | +179.0% |
| PennyMac Mortgage I… (PMT) | 100 | 100.2 | +0.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AGM vs PMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AGM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 409.4% 10Y total return vs PMT's 106.3%
- 15.7% margin vs PMT's 13.8%
- 4.5% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs PMT's 14.5%
PMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 14.5%
- Rev growth 103.8%, EPS growth -27.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, current ratio 0.03x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 103.8% FFO/revenue growth vs AGM's -18.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.1x vs 9.5x), PEG 0.24 vs 0.63 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.7% margin vs PMT's 13.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.71 vs AGM's 0.76, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs PMT's 14.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.8% vs PMT's +0.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.7% ROA vs AGM's 0.6%, ROIC 0.4% vs 0.6% |
AGM vs PMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AGM vs PMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AGM and PMT each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGM and PMT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.3B and $957M in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.7% (AGM) to 13.8% (PMT).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $957M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | $342M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $210M | $132M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $222M | -$9.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +49.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +35.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.7% | +13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | -9.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -98.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
PMT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.8x trailing earnings, AGM trades at a 3% valuation discount to PMT's 11.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PMT offers better value at 0.38x vs AGM's 0.72x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.0B | $960M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31.8B | $19.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.76x | 11.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.48x | 7.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.72x | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 124.53x | 210.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.48x | 0.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.14x | 0.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.38x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AGM delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $7 for PMT. PMT carries lower financial leverage with a 10.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AGM's 17.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AGM scores 4/9 vs PMT's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +7.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.6% | +0.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.1% | +0.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 17.93x | 10.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29.9B | $18.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $931M | $272M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30.8B | $19.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.17x | 0.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AGM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AGM five years ago would be worth $18,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,850 for PMT. Over the past 12 months, AGM leads with a +5.8% total return vs PMT's +0.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AGM at 14.5% vs PMT's 10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.3% | -9.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +5.8% | +0.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.2% | +35.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.7% | -1.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +409.4% | +106.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.5% | +10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AGM and PMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGM's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AGM currently trades 84.9% from its 52-week high vs PMT's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.71x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $210.64 | $13.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $136.57 | $10.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.9% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 53.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 102K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AGM and PMT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AGM as "Buy" and PMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.0% upside for PMT (target: $15) vs 30.2% for AGM (target: $233). For income investors, PMT offers the higher dividend yield at 14.53% vs AGM's 4.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $233.00 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +14.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.11 | $1.60 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AGM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). PMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
AGM vs PMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AGM or PMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is the stronger pick with 103.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AGM or PMT?
On trailing P/E, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the cheapest at 10.
8x versus PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust at 11. 1x. On forward P/E, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust is actually cheaper at 7. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust wins at 0. 24x versus Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation's 0. 63x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AGM or PMT?
Over the past 5 years, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) delivered a total return of +81.
7%, compared to -1. 5% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AGM returned +409. 4% versus PMT's +106. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AGM or PMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
71β versus Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation's 0. 76β — meaning AGM is approximately 7% more volatile than PMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 18% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AGM or PMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is pulling ahead at 103.
8% versus -18. 9% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation grew EPS 1. 1% year-over-year, compared to -27. 7% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AGM or PMT?
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
7% net margin versus 12. 4% for PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust — meaning it keeps 15. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AGM leads at 19. 4% versus 9. 1% for PMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGM leads at 29. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AGM or PMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation's 0. 63x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 9. 5x for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PMT: 36. 0% to $15. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AGM or PMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
PennyMac Mortgage Investment Trust (PMT) offers the highest yield at 14. 5%, versus 4. 5% for Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM).
09Is AGM or PMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
76), 4. 5% yield, +409. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AGM: +409. 4%, PMT: +106. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AGM and PMT?
These companies operate in different sectors (AGM (Financial Services) and PMT (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AGM is a small-cap deep-value stock; PMT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.