Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AHG vs HCM vs ZLAB vs JFIN vs LEGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Internet Content & Information
Biotechnology
AHG vs HCM vs ZLAB vs JFIN vs LEGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Internet Content & Information | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $564M | $2.26B | $2.06B | $535M | $5.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $602M | $453M | $6.54B | $1.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-135M | $467M | $-178M | $1.71B | $-297M |
| Gross Margin | -1.9% | 8.9% | 57.9% | 80.9% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | -11.3% | -3.3% | -53.5% | 32.1% | -13.2% |
| Forward P/E | 0.5x | 41.1x | — | 0.5x | 116.2x |
| Total Debt | $82K | $90M | $224M | $52M | $414M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $176M | $154M | $680M | $541M | $902M |
AHG vs HCM vs ZLAB vs JFIN vs LEGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akso Health Group (AHG) | 100 | 81.8 | -18.2% |
| HUTCHMED (China) Li… (HCM) | 100 | 47.6 | -52.4% |
| Zai Lab Limited (ZLAB) | 100 | 22.6 | -77.4% |
| Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) | 100 | 126.6 | +26.6% |
| Legend Biotech Corp… (LEGN) | 100 | 66.1 | -33.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AHG vs HCM vs ZLAB vs JFIN vs LEGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AHG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.12
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 14.20x
- Beta 0.12, current ratio 14.20x
- 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs HCM's -24.8%
HCM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- -0.4% 10Y total return vs LEGN's -24.0%
- 77.5% margin vs AHG's -9.1%
- 30.6% ROA vs AHG's -62.8%, ROIC -5.2% vs -73.9%
ZLAB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.3%, EPS growth 38.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.9%
JFIN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (0.5x vs 116.2x)
- 16.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Among these 5 stocks, LEGN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.1% NII/revenue growth vs HCM's -24.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.5x vs 116.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 77.5% margin vs AHG's -9.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs JFIN's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 16.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs JFIN's -54.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 30.6% ROA vs AHG's -62.8%, ROIC -5.2% vs -73.9% |
AHG vs HCM vs ZLAB vs JFIN vs LEGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AHG vs HCM vs ZLAB vs JFIN vs LEGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JFIN leads in 4 of 6 categories
AHG leads 2 • HCM leads 0 • ZLAB leads 0 • LEGN leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.5B annually — 442.3x AHG's $15M. HCM is the more profitable business, keeping 77.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AHG's -9.1%. On growth, LEGN holds the edge at +64.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $602M | $453M | $6.5B | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$164M | -$7M | -$231M | $2.1B | -$107M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$135M | $467M | -$178M | $1.7B | -$297M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$50M | -$108M | $0 | -$231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +8.9% | +57.9% | +80.9% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.3% | -3.3% | -53.5% | +32.1% | -13.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +77.5% | -39.3% | +26.2% | -28.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | -8.2% | -23.9% | +11.8% | -22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -9.2% | -6.5% | +1.8% | +64.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.8% | +16.6% | -11.1% | +44.9% | -2.2% |
Valuation Metrics
JFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.7x trailing earnings, JFIN trades at a 97% valuation discount to HCM's 59.7x P/E.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $564M | $2.3B | $2.1B | $535M | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $388M | $2.2B | $1.6B | $463M | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.13x | 59.68x | -11.63x | 1.69x | -8.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.49x | 41.10x | — | 0.49x | 116.25x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.12x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 2.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 38.20x | 3.58x | 4.47x | 0.63x | 5.03x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.83x | 2.97x | 2.85x | 0.57x | 2.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 551.96x | — | — | 5.30x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
JFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCM delivers a 46.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-68 for AHG. AHG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LEGN's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JFIN scores 6/9 vs LEGN's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -67.8% | +46.4% | -24.3% | +39.7% | -29.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.8% | +30.6% | -15.5% | +21.6% | -17.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -73.9% | -5.2% | -41.7% | +39.9% | -12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -98.0% | -4.9% | -27.2% | +32.2% | -11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.12x | 0.31x | 0.02x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$176M | -$64M | -$455M | -$489M | -$488M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176M | $154M | $680M | $541M | $902M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $81,737 | $90M | $224M | $52M | $414M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -15.22x | -81.89x | — | -12.69x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AHG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AHG five years ago would be worth $13,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,245 for ZLAB. Over the past 12 months, AHG leads with a +39.4% total return vs JFIN's -54.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AHG at 84.9% vs LEGN's -25.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +23.8% | -3.8% | +7.3% | -17.8% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.4% | -9.7% | -36.2% | -54.1% | -12.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +532.6% | -15.4% | -49.7% | +36.5% | -59.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.5% | -47.5% | -87.6% | +33.4% | -4.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.2% | -0.4% | -33.4% | -56.6% | -24.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +84.9% | -5.4% | -20.5% | +10.9% | -25.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AHG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AHG is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JFIN's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AHG currently trades 79.2% from its 52-week high vs JFIN's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.12x | 0.66x | 1.17x | 1.21x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $19.50 | $44.34 | $19.23 | $45.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.07 | $12.91 | $15.96 | $3.71 | $16.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.2% | +67.3% | +41.9% | +25.7% | +62.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.2 | 35.5 | 41.0 | 54.3 | 74.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 151K | 31K | 743K | 63K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
JFIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HCM as "Buy", ZLAB as "Buy", JFIN as "Buy", LEGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 105.9% upside for LEGN (target: $58) vs 33.3% for HCM (target: $18). JFIN is the only dividend payer here at 16.84% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.50 | $35.00 | — | $57.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 11 | 1 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +16.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $5.67 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
JFIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AHG leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
AHG vs HCM vs ZLAB vs JFIN vs LEGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Akso Health Group (AHG) is the stronger pick with 512.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -24. 8% for HUTCHMED (China) Limited (HCM). Jiayin Group Inc. (JFIN) offers the better valuation at 1. 7x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HUTCHMED (China) Limited (HCM) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN?
On trailing P/E, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) is the cheapest at 1. 7x versus HUTCHMED (China) Limited at 59. 7x. On forward P/E, Jiayin Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN?
Over the past 5 years, Akso Health Group (AHG) delivered a total return of +38.
5%, compared to -87. 6% for Zai Lab Limited (ZLAB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCM returned -0. 4% versus AHG's -97. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Akso Health Group (AHG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
12β versus Jiayin Group Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning JFIN is approximately 884% more volatile than AHG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Akso Health Group (AHG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 41% for Legend Biotech Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Akso Health Group (AHG) is pulling ahead at 512.
1% versus -24. 8% for HUTCHMED (China) Limited (HCM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Zai Lab Limited grew EPS 38. 5% year-over-year, compared to -66. 0% for Legend Biotech Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LEGN leads at 106. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN?
Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 2% net margin versus -913. 4% for Akso Health Group — meaning it keeps 18. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JFIN leads at 21. 5% versus -1125. 4% for AHG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JFIN leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Jiayin Group Inc.
(JFIN) trades at 0. 5x forward P/E versus 116. 2x for Legend Biotech Corporation — 115. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LEGN: 105. 9% to $57. 89.
08Which pays a better dividend — AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN?
In this comparison, JFIN (16.
8% yield) pays a dividend. AHG, HCM, ZLAB, LEGN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AHG or HCM or ZLAB or JFIN or LEGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Akso Health Group (AHG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
12)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AHG: -97. 2%, ZLAB: -33. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AHG and HCM and ZLAB and JFIN and LEGN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AHG (Financial Services) and HCM (Healthcare) and ZLAB (Healthcare) and JFIN (Communication Services) and LEGN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AHG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HCM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ZLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; JFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; LEGN is a small-cap high-growth stock. JFIN pays a dividend while AHG, HCM, ZLAB, LEGN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Net Margin > 15%
- Dividend Yield > 6.7%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.