REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AHH vs GMRE vs NXRT vs NTST vs IIPR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Residential
REIT - Retail
REIT - Industrial
AHH vs GMRE vs NXRT vs NTST vs IIPR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Residential | REIT - Retail | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $515M | $94M | $756M | $1.70B | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $325M | $148M | $252M | $176M | $263M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-22M | $2M | $-32M | $185K | $120M |
| Gross Margin | 31.3% | 68.8% | 91.1% | 92.4% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 24.9% | 11.5% | 27.7% | 46.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 595.7x | — | 64.8x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.65B | $654M | $1.56B | $0.00 | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $49M | $7M | $14M | $14M | $48M |
AHH vs GMRE vs NXRT vs NTST vs IIPR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Armada Hoffler Prop… (AHH) | 100 | 63.7 | -36.3% |
| Global Medical REIT… (GMRE) | 100 | 54.2 | -45.8% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 72.0 | -28.0% |
| NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) | 100 | 111.0 | +11.0% |
| Innovative Industri… (IIPR) | 100 | 46.0 | -54.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AHH vs GMRE vs NXRT vs NTST vs IIPR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AHH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
GMRE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 63.5%
- 308.1% 10Y total return vs IIPR's 436.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 0.03x
- Beta 0.48, yield 63.5%, current ratio 0.03x
Among these 5 stocks, NXRT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
NTST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 30.0%, EPS growth 150.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.2%
- PEG 1.11 vs IIPR's 3.52
- 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs AHH's -59.7%
- Lower P/E (64.8x vs 595.7x)
IIPR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 45.6% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- 5.1% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.3% vs 1.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.0% FFO/revenue growth vs AHH's -59.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (64.8x vs 595.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 45.6% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.05 vs IIPR's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 63.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs NXRT's 7.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.6% vs NXRT's -15.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.1% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.3% vs 1.1% |
AHH vs GMRE vs NXRT vs NTST vs IIPR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AHH vs GMRE vs NXRT vs NTST vs IIPR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NTST leads in 3 of 6 categories
GMRE leads 1 • IIPR leads 1 • AHH leads 0 • NXRT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AHH is the larger business by revenue, generating $325M annually — 2.2x GMRE's $148M. IIPR is the more profitable business, keeping 45.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, NTST holds the edge at +27.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $325M | $148M | $252M | $176M | $263M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $172M | $95M | $125M | $133M | $197M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$22M | $2M | -$32M | $185,000 | $120M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $19M | $79M | $106M | $144M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.3% | +68.8% | +91.1% | +92.4% | +60.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +24.9% | +11.5% | +27.7% | +46.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.9% | +1.7% | -12.7% | +0.1% | +45.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +16.7% | +12.6% | +31.2% | +59.9% | +54.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -54.4% | +18.7% | +0.5% | +27.7% | -3.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | -166.2% | 0.0% | +110.6% | -1.0% |
Valuation Metrics
GMRE leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, IIPR trades at a 94% valuation discount to NTST's 254.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IIPR offers better value at 3.85x vs NTST's 4.35x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $515M | $94M | $756M | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $741M | $2.3B | $1.7B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -49.46x | 115.29x | -23.65x | 254.50x | 14.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 595.67x | — | 64.78x | 13.17x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.35x | 3.85x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.22x | 8.35x | 18.60x | 12.34x | 9.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.81x | 0.68x | 3.01x | 8.72x | 6.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.79x | 0.17x | 2.52x | 1.18x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.02x | — | 9.05x | 15.52x | 9.26x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IIPR delivers a 6.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. IIPR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.21x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTST scores 6/9 vs IIPR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +0.5% | -10.1% | +0.0% | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | +0.2% | -1.7% | +0.0% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +2.0% | +1.1% | +2.1% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.7% | +5.3% | +1.5% | +2.1% | +5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.99x | 1.18x | 5.18x | — | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $647M | $1.5B | -$14M | $346M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $49M | $7M | $14M | $14M | $48M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $654M | $1.6B | $0 | $394M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.99x | 1.14x | 0.47x | — | 6.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NTST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NTST five years ago would be worth $11,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,999 for IIPR. Over the past 12 months, NTST leads with a +32.6% total return vs NXRT's -15.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NTST at 8.3% vs AHH's -11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.1% | +6.9% | +2.6% | +15.8% | +18.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1.5% | +0.1% | -15.2% | +32.6% | +20.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -30.3% | +5.6% | -15.5% | +27.0% | +14.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.6% | -21.4% | -23.0% | +14.9% | -50.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.0% | +308.1% | +211.1% | +40.7% | +436.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.3% | +1.8% | -5.5% | +8.3% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
NTST leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NTST is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IIPR's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NTST currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs NXRT's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 0.48x | 0.62x | 0.05x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.71 | $39.93 | $38.30 | $21.30 | $61.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.14 | $29.05 | $23.79 | $15.24 | $44.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.4% | +89.5% | +77.8% | +95.6% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 52.7 | 71.0 | 57.7 | 59.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 319K | 130K | 216K | 1.2M | 303K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — GMRE and NXRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AHH as "Hold", GMRE as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", NTST as "Buy", IIPR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 28.3% upside for AHH (target: $8) vs -22.3% for IIPR (target: $44). For income investors, GMRE offers the higher dividend yield at 63.51% vs NTST's 4.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.25 | $40.00 | $27.00 | $22.03 | $44.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 22 | 10 | 18 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.5% | +63.5% | +7.1% | +4.1% | +13.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | 12 | 0 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.74 | $22.70 | $2.11 | $0.83 | $7.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.0% | +1.2% |
NTST leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). GMRE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AHH vs GMRE vs NXRT vs NTST vs IIPR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger pick with 30. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -59. 7% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH). Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Global Medical REIT Inc. (GMRE) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR?
On trailing P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus NETSTREIT Corp. at 254. 5x. On forward P/E, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NETSTREIT Corp. wins at 1. 11x versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 3. 52x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR?
Over the past 5 years, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) delivered a total return of +14. 9%, compared to -50. 0% for Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IIPR returned +436. 4% versus AHH's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 05β versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 0. 92β — meaning IIPR is approximately 1745% more volatile than NTST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 21% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is pulling ahead at 30. 0% versus -59. 7% for Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (AHH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NETSTREIT Corp. grew EPS 150. 0% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTST leads at 28. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR?
Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc.
(IIPR) is the more profitable company, earning 43. 0% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IIPR leads at 46. 7% versus 11. 1% for NXRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NTST leads at 99. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 11x versus Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. 's 3. 52x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Innovative Industrial Properties, Inc. (IIPR) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 595. 7x for Global Medical REIT Inc. — 582. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AHH: 28. 3% to $8. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Global Medical REIT Inc. (GMRE) offers the highest yield at 63. 5%, versus 4. 1% for NETSTREIT Corp. (NTST).
09Is AHH or GMRE or NXRT or NTST or IIPR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NETSTREIT Corp.
(NTST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 05), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NTST: +40. 7%, AHH: +12. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AHH and GMRE and NXRT and NTST and IIPR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AHH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GMRE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NTST is a small-cap high-growth stock; IIPR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.