Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AI vs ABTS vs NVDA vs BBAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Semiconductors
Information Technology Services
AI vs ABTS vs NVDA vs BBAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Financial - Capital Markets | Semiconductors | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.28B | $3M | $5.14T | $19.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $307M | $6M | $215.94B | $127M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-435M | $-2M | $120.07B | $-289M |
| Gross Margin | 43.5% | 22.8% | 71.1% | 25.8% |
| Operating Margin | -151.7% | -22.1% | 60.4% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 25.6x | — |
| Total Debt | $5M | $2M | $11.41B | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $164M | $94K | $10.61B | $87M |
AI vs ABTS vs NVDA vs BBAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| C3.ai, Inc. (AI) | 100 | 14.5 | -85.5% |
| Abits Group Inc. (ABTS) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1409.0 | +1309.0% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 42.9 | -57.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AI vs ABTS vs NVDA vs BBAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.53, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 6.86x
ABTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.68 vs BBAI's 3.31
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.73, yield 0.0%
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs BBAI's -57.6%
- Beta 1.73, yield 0.0%, current ratio 3.91x
BBAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +80.7% vs AI's -57.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs AI's -48.5%, ROIC 81.8% vs -35.1% |
AI vs ABTS vs NVDA vs BBAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AI vs ABTS vs NVDA vs BBAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
ABTS leads 1 • AI leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 38511.7x ABTS's $6M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $307M | $6M | $215.9B | $127M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$455M | $5M | $133.2B | -$75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$435M | -$2M | $120.1B | -$289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$127M | -$3M | $96.7B | -$56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +22.8% | +71.1% | +25.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -151.7% | -22.1% | +60.4% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -141.4% | -11.5% | +55.6% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -41.3% | -51.9% | +44.8% | -44.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.1% | — | +73.2% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.2% | +36.8% | +97.8% | +52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ABTS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ABTS's 3.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 38.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $3M | $5.14T | $19.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $5M | $5.14T | $19.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.28x | -4.26x | 43.16x | -5.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 25.55x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.45x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 3.66x | 38.59x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.30x | 0.49x | 23.80x | 154.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 0.28x | 32.85x | 24.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 53.17x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-60 for AI. AI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ABTS's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABTS scores 5/9 vs AI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.4% | -15.2% | +76.3% | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.5% | -12.5% | +58.1% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.1% | -8.3% | +81.8% | -19.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.5% | -12.4% | +97.2% | -19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.23x | 0.07x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$160M | $2M | $807M | -$63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $164M | $94,132 | $10.6B | $87M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $2M | $11.4B | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -9.96x | 545.03x | -18.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $142,893 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $121 for ABTS. Over the past 12 months, NVDA leads with a +80.7% total return vs AI's -57.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs ABTS's -56.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.3% | -77.7% | +12.0% | -28.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.0% | -55.1% | +80.7% | +36.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.2% | -91.8% | +625.9% | +49.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.0% | -98.8% | +1328.9% | -56.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -99.8% | +23902.3% | -57.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.7% | -56.6% | +93.6% | +14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABTS and NVDA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ABTS is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs ABTS's 10.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.53x | 0.68x | 1.73x | 3.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.24 | $10.86 | $216.80 | $9.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.67 | $1.00 | $112.28 | $2.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.7% | +10.6% | +97.6% | +44.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 40.2 | 60.7 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 492K | 164.5M | 34.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AI as "Hold", NVDA as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs -22.8% for AI (target: $7).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.40 | — | $278.83 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | — | 79 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ABTS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AI vs ABTS vs NVDA vs BBAI: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AI or ABTS or NVDA or BBAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AI or ABTS or NVDA or BBAI?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1329%, compared to -98.
8% for Abits Group Inc. (ABTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +239. 0% versus ABTS's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AI or ABTS or NVDA or BBAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Abits Group Inc.
(ABTS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 385% more volatile than ABTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, C3. ai, Inc. (AI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for Abits Group Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AI or ABTS or NVDA or BBAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for C3. ai, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AI or ABTS or NVDA or BBAI?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -83. 4% for AI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is AI or ABTS or NVDA or BBAI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43.
9% to $6. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — AI or ABTS or NVDA or BBAI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is AI or ABTS or NVDA or BBAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Abits Group Inc.
(ABTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68)). C3. ai, Inc. (AI) carries a higher beta of 2. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ABTS: -99. 8%, AI: -82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AI and ABTS and NVDA and BBAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (AI (Technology) and ABTS (Financial Services) and NVDA (Technology) and BBAI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AI is a small-cap high-growth stock; ABTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.