Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AI vs BBAI vs SOUN vs PLTR vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Specialty Retail
AI vs BBAI vs SOUN vs PLTR vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $1.28B | $19.73B | $4.10B | $314.08B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $307M | $127M | $169M | $5.22B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-435M | $-289M | $-14M | $2.28B | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 43.5% | 25.8% | 42.4% | 84.1% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -151.7% | -68.3% | -13.8% | 38.1% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 107.1x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $24M | $4M | $229M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $164M | $87M | $248M | $1.42B | $86.81B |
AI vs BBAI vs SOUN vs PLTR vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| C3.ai, Inc. (AI) | 100 | 56.4 | -43.6% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 41.7 | -58.3% |
| SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 100 | 1317.9 | +1217.9% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 218.2 | +118.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AI vs BBAI vs SOUN vs PLTR vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SOUN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 99.4%, EPS growth 96.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 75.7%
- 99.4% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
PLTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 13.4% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 7.11x
- Beta 1.91, current ratio 7.11x
- 43.7% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- beta 1.51
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 1.51 vs SOUN's 3.58
- +43.7% vs AI's -57.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 99.4% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.7% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.51 vs SOUN's 3.58 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs AI's -57.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.4% ROA vs AI's -48.5%, ROIC 22.3% vs -35.1% |
AI vs BBAI vs SOUN vs PLTR vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AI vs BBAI vs SOUN vs PLTR vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PLTR leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMZN leads 1 • AI leads 0 • BBAI leads 0 • SOUN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 5832.6x BBAI's $127M. PLTR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, PLTR holds the edge at +84.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $307M | $127M | $169M | $5.2B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$455M | -$75M | $52M | $2.0B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$435M | -$289M | -$14M | $2.3B | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$127M | -$56M | -$77M | $2.7B | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.5% | +25.8% | +42.4% | +84.1% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -151.7% | -68.3% | -13.8% | +38.1% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -141.4% | -2.3% | -8.3% | +43.7% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -41.3% | -44.3% | -45.5% | +51.5% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.1% | -0.9% | +59.4% | +84.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -53.2% | +52.0% | +113.9% | +3.1% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AI and AMZN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.8x trailing earnings, AMZN trades at a 83% valuation discount to PLTR's 217.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOUN's 355.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.3B | $19.7B | $4.1B | $314.1B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.1B | $19.7B | $3.9B | $312.9B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.28x | -5.09x | -278.32x | 217.56x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 107.12x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 355.51x | 217.25x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.30x | 154.51x | 24.30x | 70.18x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 24.45x | 8.42x | 46.95x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 149.52x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR delivers a 31.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-60 for AI. AI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLTR scores 8/9 vs AI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -60.4% | -50.7% | -3.5% | +31.7% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.5% | -35.3% | -2.2% | +26.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -35.1% | -19.5% | -16.8% | +22.3% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.5% | -19.6% | -4.2% | +21.6% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.04x | 0.01x | 0.03x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$160M | -$63M | -$244M | -$1.2B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $164M | $87M | $248M | $1.4B | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $24M | $4M | $229M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -18.17x | -12.84x | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth $69,399 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,701 for AI. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs AI's -57.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLTR at 160.7% vs AI's -20.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.3% | -28.6% | -9.2% | -18.3% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.0% | +36.7% | +5.0% | +24.1% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.2% | +49.5% | +254.0% | +1670.8% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.0% | -56.9% | +28.4% | +594.0% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -57.6% | +28.4% | +1342.8% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.7% | +14.3% | +52.4% | +160.7% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AMZN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMZN is the less volatile stock with a 1.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOUN's 3.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs AI's 31.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.53x | 3.31x | 3.58x | 1.91x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $30.24 | $9.39 | $22.17 | $207.52 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.67 | $2.96 | $5.83 | $107.00 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.7% | +44.4% | +43.4% | +66.0% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 63.3 | 64.6 | 41.2 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.5M | 34.6M | 27.9M | 46.3M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AI as "Hold", BBAI as "Hold", SOUN as "Buy", PLTR as "Hold", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 43.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs -22.8% for AI (target: $7).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.40 | $6.00 | $13.33 | $194.53 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 4 | 8 | 26 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
PLTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMZN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
AI vs BBAI vs SOUN vs PLTR vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is the stronger pick with 99. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 37. 8x trailing P/E (34. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SoundHound AI, Inc. (SOUN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the cheapest at 37. 8x versus Palantir Technologies Inc. at 217. 6x. On forward P/E, Amazon. com, Inc. is actually cheaper at 34. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) delivered a total return of +594. 0%, compared to -83. 0% for C3. ai, Inc. (AI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLTR returned +1343% versus AI's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 51β versus SoundHound AI, Inc. 's 3. 58β — meaning SOUN is approximately 137% more volatile than AMZN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, C3. ai, Inc. (AI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SoundHound AI, Inc.
(SOUN) is pulling ahead at 99. 4% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palantir Technologies Inc. grew EPS 231. 6% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for C3. ai, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOUN leads at 75. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN?
Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 3% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLTR leads at 31. 6% versus -83. 4% for AI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTR leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) trades at 34. 8x forward P/E versus 107. 1x for Palantir Technologies Inc. — 72. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43. 9% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AI or BBAI or SOUN or PLTR or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1343% 10Y return). C3. ai, Inc. (AI) carries a higher beta of 2. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PLTR: +1343%, AI: -82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AI and BBAI and SOUN and PLTR and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (AI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology) and SOUN (Technology) and PLTR (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SOUN is a small-cap high-growth stock; PLTR is a large-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.