Insurance - Specialty
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AIFU vs QFIN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
AIFU vs QFIN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Specialty | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $177M | $3.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.20B | $17.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $280M | $6.89B |
| Gross Margin | 32.9% | 61.8% |
| Operating Margin | 6.1% | 43.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.0x | 0.5x |
| Total Debt | $206M | $1.65B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $192M | $4.45B |
AIFU vs QFIN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AIFU Inc. (AIFU) | 100 | 5.3 | -94.7% |
| Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) | 100 | 44.3 | -55.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIFU vs QFIN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIFU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
- 246.9% 10Y total return vs QFIN's 16.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 7.8%, current ratio 2.50x
QFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 5.4%, EPS growth 60.7%
- 5.4% NII/revenue growth vs AIFU's -43.4%
- 36.5% margin vs AIFU's 8.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.4% NII/revenue growth vs AIFU's -43.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.5% margin vs AIFU's 8.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs QFIN's 1.20 | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -56.7% vs QFIN's -63.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs AIFU's 7.0%, ROIC 23.1% vs -13.8% |
AIFU vs QFIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AIFU vs QFIN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QFIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 5.4x AIFU's $3.2B. QFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 36.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIFU's 8.8%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $175M | $8.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $280M | $6.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $89M | $10.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.9% | +61.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +43.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +36.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +53.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -9.7% |
Valuation Metrics
AIFU leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.1x trailing earnings, QFIN trades at a 99% valuation discount to AIFU's 353.1x P/E.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $177M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $179M | $3.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 353.14x | 2.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.02x | 0.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.67x | 1.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.42x | 0.56x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.97x | 2.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QFIN delivers a 28.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $12 for AIFU. QFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIFU's 0.08x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.2% | +28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.0% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.8% | +23.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -13.7% | +35.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | -$2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $192M | $4.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $206M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 32.53x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
QFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in QFIN five years ago would be worth $8,090 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for AIFU. Over the past 12 months, AIFU leads with a -56.7% total return vs QFIN's -63.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors QFIN at 0.2% vs AIFU's -59.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.3% | -22.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -56.7% | -63.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.2% | +0.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | -19.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +246.9% | +16.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -59.2% | +0.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AIFU and QFIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AIFU is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than QFIN's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. QFIN currently trades 28.1% from its 52-week high vs AIFU's 16.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.94x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.40 | $47.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $12.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +16.1% | +28.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.0 | 53.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
QFIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
QFIN is the only dividend payer here at 9.26% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $28.15 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +9.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $8.32 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +11.6% |
QFIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AIFU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AIFU vs QFIN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIFU or QFIN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 4% for AIFU Inc. (AIFU). Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) offers the better valuation at 2. 1x trailing P/E (0. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIFU or QFIN?
On trailing P/E, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the cheapest at 2. 1x versus AIFU Inc. at 353. 1x. On forward P/E, AIFU Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIFU or QFIN?
Over the past 5 years, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) delivered a total return of -19. 1%, compared to -54. 0% for AIFU Inc. (AIFU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AIFU returned +246. 9% versus QFIN's +16. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIFU or QFIN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AIFU Inc.
(AIFU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Qfin Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 20β — meaning QFIN is approximately 27% more volatile than AIFU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 8% for AIFU Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIFU or QFIN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -43. 4% for AIFU Inc. (AIFU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Qfin Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 60. 7% year-over-year, compared to -98. 9% for AIFU Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIFU or QFIN?
Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus 25. 2% for AIFU Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QFIN leads at 43. 9% versus -24. 1% for AIFU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — QFIN leads at 61. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIFU or QFIN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AIFU Inc.
(AIFU) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 5x for Qfin Holdings, Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIFU or QFIN?
In this comparison, QFIN (9.
3% yield) pays a dividend. AIFU does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AIFU or QFIN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Qfin Holdings, Inc.
(QFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20), 9. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (QFIN: +16. 1%, AIFU: +246. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIFU and QFIN?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AIFU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; QFIN is a small-cap deep-value stock. QFIN pays a dividend while AIFU does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.