Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AIMD vs NNOX vs INVA vs RXRX vs SDGR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AIMD
Ainos, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-99.3%
NNOX
Nano-X Imaging Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$115M
5Y Perf.-94.8%
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.93B
5Y Perf.+99.1%
RXRX
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.46B
5Y Perf.-90.2%
SDGR
Schrödinger, Inc.

Medical - Healthcare Information Services

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$992M
5Y Perf.-82.6%

AIMD vs NNOX vs INVA vs RXRX vs SDGR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AIMD logoAIMD
NNOX logoNNOX
INVA logoINVA
RXRX logoRXRX
SDGR logoSDGR
IndustryBiotechnologyMedical - DevicesBiotechnologyBiotechnologyMedical - Healthcare Information Services
Market Cap$8M$115M$1.93B$1.46B$992M
Revenue (TTM)$113K$12M$424M$66M$255M
Net Income (TTM)$-15M$-56M$504M$-560M$-103M
Gross Margin82.7%-98.8%76.2%-34.4%55.3%
Operating Margin-126.7%-469.7%14.8%-8.8%-64.7%
Forward P/E11.9x
Total Debt$12M$7M$269M$78M$109M
Cash & Equiv.$4M$39M$551M$743M$231M

AIMD vs NNOX vs INVA vs RXRX vs SDGRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AIMD
NNOX
INVA
RXRX
SDGR
StockApr 21May 26Return
Ainos, Inc. (AIMD)1000.7-99.3%
Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX)1005.2-94.8%
Innoviva, Inc. (INVA)100199.1+99.1%
Recursion Pharmaceu… (RXRX)1009.8-90.2%
Schrödinger, Inc. (SDGR)10017.4-82.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AIMD vs NNOX vs INVA vs RXRX vs SDGR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INVA leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AIMD
Ainos, Inc.
The Healthcare Pick

AIMD plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
NNOX
Nano-X Imaging Ltd.
The Healthcare Pick

NNOX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
INVA
Innoviva, Inc.
The Income Pick

INVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.13
  • 94.9% 10Y total return vs SDGR's -53.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 22.9%, current ratio 14.64x
  • Beta 0.13, current ratio 14.64x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
RXRX
Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
The Growth Play

RXRX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 26.9%, EPS growth 14.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
  • 26.9% revenue growth vs AIMD's -83.0%
Best for: growth exposure
SDGR
Schrödinger, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, SDGR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthRXRX logoRXRX26.9% revenue growth vs AIMD's -83.0%
ValueINVA logoINVABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsINVA logoINVA118.9% margin vs AIMD's -132.3%
Stability / SafetyINVA logoINVABeta 0.13 vs RXRX's 3.18
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)INVA logoINVA+21.7% vs NNOX's -64.4%
Efficiency (ROA)INVA logoINVA32.4% ROA vs AIMD's -58.8%, ROIC 14.2% vs -39.8%

AIMD vs NNOX vs INVA vs RXRX vs SDGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AIMDAinos, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NNOXNano-X Imaging Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

INVAInnoviva, Inc.
FY 2025
Royalty
57.5%$236M
Product
41.8%$172M
License And Other Revenue
0.7%$3M
RXRXRecursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
FY 2025
License and Service
99.4%$74M
Grant
0.6%$425,000
SDGRSchrödinger, Inc.
FY 2025
Software Products And Services
34.2%$200M
Revenue From Contract With Customer Before Software Contribution
31.5%$184M
On Premise Software
17.4%$101M
Hosted Software
7.7%$45M
Maintenance
4.7%$27M
Software Contribution
2.7%$16M
Professional Services
1.7%$10M

AIMD vs NNOX vs INVA vs RXRX vs SDGR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINVALAGGINGRXRX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

INVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $424M annually — 3752.1x AIMD's $113,037. INVA is the more profitable business, keeping 118.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIMD's -132.3%. On growth, NNOX holds the edge at +13.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAIMD logoAIMDAinos, Inc.NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.RXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…SDGR logoSDGRSchrödinger, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$113,037$12M$424M$66M$255M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M-$46M$86M-$521M-$159M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$15M-$56M$504M-$560M-$103M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$5M-$47M$181M-$326M-$148M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+82.7%-98.8%+76.2%-34.4%+55.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-126.7%-4.7%+14.8%-8.8%-64.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-132.3%-4.5%+118.9%-8.4%-40.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-41.2%-3.8%+42.8%-4.9%-58.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+13.7%+10.6%-56.1%-1.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-93.9%+8.7%+4.0%+56.0%+1.2%
INVA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SDGR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
MetricAIMD logoAIMDAinos, Inc.NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.RXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…SDGR logoSDGRSchrödinger, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$8M$115M$1.9B$1.5B$992M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$16M$83M$1.7B$797M$871M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.12x-1.93x6.91x-2.27x-9.42x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.91x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.10x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue403.55x10.20x4.55x19.58x3.88x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.07x0.55x1.65x1.29x2.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.88x79.66x
SDGR leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

INVA delivers a 46.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-119 for AIMD. NNOX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AIMD's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INVA scores 5/9 vs AIMD's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAIMD logoAIMDAinos, Inc.NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.RXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…SDGR logoSDGRSchrödinger, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-119.4%-35.5%+46.5%-54.3%-30.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-58.8%-31.6%+32.4%-40.6%-15.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-39.8%-27.9%+14.2%-95.8%-39.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-50.0%-28.4%+12.4%-50.1%-28.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924544
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.77x0.04x0.23x0.07x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8M-$32M-$282M-$665M-$121M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$39M$551M$743M$231M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$12M$7M$269M$78M$109M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-19.79x-379.29x63.45x-336.46x
INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in INVA five years ago would be worth $19,437 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $61 for AIMD. Over the past 12 months, INVA leads with a +21.7% total return vs NNOX's -64.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INVA at 25.0% vs AIMD's -55.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAIMD logoAIMDAinos, Inc.NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.RXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…SDGR logoSDGRSchrödinger, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-0.3%-37.8%+14.7%-22.1%-26.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-35.4%-64.4%+21.7%-22.0%-44.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-91.3%-89.2%+95.2%-41.6%-52.1%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.4%-93.9%+94.4%-88.2%-80.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.0%-96.1%+94.9%-81.8%-53.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-55.6%-52.4%+25.0%-16.4%-21.8%
INVA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

INVA is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RXRX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INVA currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs NNOX's 30.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAIMD logoAIMDAinos, Inc.NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.RXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…SDGR logoSDGRSchrödinger, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.54x1.86x0.13x3.18x1.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.50$5.86$25.15$7.18$27.63
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.26$1.66$16.52$2.80$10.95
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+38.8%+30.0%+90.7%+45.5%+48.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.338.539.949.559.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded25K1.4M621K12.5M1.3M
INVA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: NNOX as "Buy", INVA as "Buy", RXRX as "Hold", SDGR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 922.7% upside for NNOX (target: $18) vs 35.5% for SDGR (target: $18).

MetricAIMD logoAIMDAinos, Inc.NNOX logoNNOXNano-X Imaging Lt…INVA logoINVAInnoviva, Inc.RXRX logoRXRXRecursion Pharmac…SDGR logoSDGRSchrödinger, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$37.67$11.00$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts5101012
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.2%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

INVA leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SDGR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallInnoviva, Inc. (INVA)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AIMD vs NNOX vs INVA vs RXRX vs SDGR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AIMD or NNOX or INVA or RXRX or SDGR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(RXRX) is the stronger pick with 26. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -83. 0% for Ainos, Inc. (AIMD). Innoviva, Inc. (INVA) offers the better valuation at 6. 9x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — AIMD or NNOX or INVA or RXRX or SDGR?

Over the past 5 years, Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) delivered a total return of +94. 4%, compared to -99. 4% for Ainos, Inc. (AIMD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INVA returned +94. 9% versus AIMD's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — AIMD or NNOX or INVA or RXRX or SDGR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning RXRX is approximately 2419% more volatile than INVA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nano-X Imaging Ltd. (NNOX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 77% for Ainos, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — AIMD or NNOX or INVA or RXRX or SDGR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

(RXRX) is pulling ahead at 26. 9% versus -83. 0% for Ainos, Inc. (AIMD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Innoviva, Inc. grew EPS 816. 7% year-over-year, compared to 14. 8% for Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NNOX leads at 105. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — AIMD or NNOX or INVA or RXRX or SDGR?

Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) is the more profitable company, earning 63. 8% net margin versus -717. 0% for Ainos, Inc. — meaning it keeps 63. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INVA leads at 38. 5% versus -667. 7% for AIMD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INVA leads at 72. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is AIMD or NNOX or INVA or RXRX or SDGR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NNOX: 922.

7% to $18. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — AIMD or NNOX or INVA or RXRX or SDGR?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is AIMD or NNOX or INVA or RXRX or SDGR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Innoviva, Inc.

(INVA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13)). Ainos, Inc. (AIMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (INVA: +94. 9%, AIMD: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between AIMD and NNOX and INVA and RXRX and SDGR?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AIMD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NNOX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RXRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SDGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AIMD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 49%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NNOX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INVA

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 71%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RXRX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SDGR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AIMD and NNOX and INVA and RXRX and SDGR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AIMD: -83.0% · NNOX: 13.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.