Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AIR vs KAI vs HEI vs GTLS vs TDG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
AIR vs KAI vs HEI vs GTLS vs TDG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $4.66B | $4.02B | $24.38B | $9.93B | $70.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.13B | $1.05B | $4.63B | $4.26B | $9.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $171M | $102M | $713M | $40M | $1.97B |
| Gross Margin | 19.0% | 45.2% | 30.4% | 32.6% | 59.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.6% | 14.9% | 22.8% | 8.5% | 46.5% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | 37.1x | 51.6x | 16.4x | 32.0x |
| Total Debt | $1.05B | $375M | $2.19B | $3.74B | $30.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $97M | $123M | $218M | $366M | $2.81B |
AIR vs KAI vs HEI vs GTLS vs TDG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAR Corp. (AIR) | 100 | 583.8 | +483.8% |
| Kadant Inc. (KAI) | 100 | 351.7 | +251.7% |
| HEICO Corporation (HEI) | 100 | 287.4 | +187.4% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 528.4 | +428.4% |
| TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG) | 100 | 292.4 | +192.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIR vs KAI vs HEI vs GTLS vs TDG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 19.9% revenue growth vs KAI's -0.1%
- +99.4% vs TDG's -3.7%
KAI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.57, Low D/E 37.8%, current ratio 9.15x
HEI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 16.3%, EPS growth 33.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
- 8.2% 10Y total return vs GTLS's 7.7%
GTLS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and stability.
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 51.6x)
- Beta 0.56 vs AIR's 1.64
TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.3%
- PEG 1.03 vs HEI's 3.14
- Beta 0.79, yield 13.3%, current ratio 3.21x
- 21.6% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.9% revenue growth vs KAI's -0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 51.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.6% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs AIR's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | 13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs KAI's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.4% vs TDG's -3.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 20.9% vs 7.4% |
AIR vs KAI vs HEI vs GTLS vs TDG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AIR vs KAI vs HEI vs GTLS vs TDG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GTLS leads in 2 of 6 categories
TDG leads 1 • KAI leads 1 • AIR leads 1 • HEI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDG is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 8.7x KAI's $1.1B. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, AIR holds the edge at +24.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $1.1B | $4.6B | $4.3B | $9.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $285M | $209M | $1.2B | $644M | $4.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $171M | $102M | $713M | $40M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $69M | $154M | $841M | $203M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | +45.2% | +30.4% | +32.6% | +59.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.6% | +14.9% | +22.8% | +8.5% | +46.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +9.7% | +15.4% | +0.9% | +21.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.2% | +14.7% | +18.1% | +4.8% | +20.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.6% | +10.9% | +14.4% | -2.5% | +13.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | 0.0% | +12.5% | -36.1% | -13.1% |
Valuation Metrics
GTLS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 38.7x trailing earnings, TDG trades at a 94% valuation discount to GTLS's 628.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TDG offers better value at 1.24x vs HEI's 3.60x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $4.0B | $24.4B | $9.9B | $70.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.6B | $4.3B | $26.4B | $13.3B | $97.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 336.43x | 39.37x | 59.09x | 628.45x | 38.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.05x | 37.06x | 51.57x | 16.40x | 32.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.11x | 3.60x | — | 1.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.34x | 20.50x | 21.69x | 14.33x | 21.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 3.82x | 5.44x | 2.33x | 7.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.48x | 4.05x | 9.31x | 2.79x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 3328.33x | 26.07x | 28.30x | 48.95x | 38.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KAI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HEI delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. KAI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GTLS's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAI scores 6/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.1% | +10.8% | +12.9% | +1.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.5% | +6.6% | +7.9% | +0.4% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.4% | +10.1% | +12.6% | +7.4% | +20.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.1% | +10.9% | +14.0% | +8.6% | +20.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.86x | 0.38x | 0.50x | 1.11x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $951M | $252M | $2.0B | $3.4B | $27.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $97M | $123M | $218M | $366M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $375M | $2.2B | $3.7B | $30.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.46x | 11.10x | 8.32x | 1.08x | 2.55x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AIR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AIR five years ago would be worth $29,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,951 for GTLS. Over the past 12 months, AIR leads with a +99.4% total return vs TDG's -3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AIR at 30.9% vs GTLS's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.4% | +19.2% | -12.0% | +0.6% | -8.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +99.4% | +17.7% | +8.1% | +37.6% | -3.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +124.2% | +76.1% | +71.7% | +62.7% | +86.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +191.8% | +86.8% | +105.2% | +29.5% | +140.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +399.6% | +635.6% | +823.0% | +772.5% | +595.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.9% | +20.8% | +19.7% | +17.6% | +23.1% |
Risk & Volatility
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIR's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs TDG's 76.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.64x | 1.57x | 1.04x | 0.56x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $127.21 | $369.97 | $361.69 | $208.51 | $1623.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.43 | $244.87 | $256.11 | $140.50 | $1123.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +92.1% | +80.1% | +99.5% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.2 | 58.0 | 60.7 | 51.2 | 56.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 446K | 165K | 698K | 1.6M | 370K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KAI and TDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIR as "Buy", KAI as "Hold", HEI as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", TDG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.3% upside for TDG (target: $1618) vs -11.0% for KAI (target: $303). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.32% vs GTLS's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $120.00 | $303.00 | $371.00 | $193.81 | $1617.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 6 | 34 | 37 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +0.1% | +0.3% | +13.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 13 | 10 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.34 | $0.23 | $0.60 | $165.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.7% |
GTLS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). TDG leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
AIR vs KAI vs HEI vs GTLS vs TDG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AAR Corp.
(AIR) is the stronger pick with 19. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Kadant Inc. (KAI). TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (32. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AAR Corp. (AIR) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG?
On trailing P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the cheapest at 38.
7x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 628. 5x. On forward P/E, Chart Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TransDigm Group Incorporated wins at 1. 03x versus HEICO Corporation's 3. 14x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG?
Over the past 5 years, AAR Corp.
(AIR) delivered a total return of +191. 8%, compared to +29. 5% for Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HEI returned +823. 0% versus AIR's +399. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus AAR Corp. 's 1. 64β — meaning AIR is approximately 194% more volatile than GTLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kadant Inc. (KAI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 111% for Chart Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AAR Corp.
(AIR) is pulling ahead at 19. 9% versus -0. 1% for Kadant Inc. (KAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HEICO Corporation grew EPS 33. 5% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG?
TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
5% net margin versus 0. 4% for AAR Corp. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus 6. 7% for AIR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 03x versus HEICO Corporation's 3. 14x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Chart Industries, Inc. (GTLS) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 51. 6x for HEICO Corporation — 35. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TDG: 30. 3% to $1617. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG?
In this comparison, TDG (13.
3% yield), KAI (0. 4% yield), GTLS (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. AIR, HEI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AIR or KAI or HEI or GTLS or TDG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 13. 3% yield, +595. 3% 10Y return). AAR Corp. (AIR) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +595. 3%, AIR: +399. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIR and KAI and HEI and GTLS and TDG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AIR is a small-cap high-growth stock; KAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HEI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. TDG pays a dividend while AIR, KAI, HEI, GTLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.