Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
Household & Personal Products
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Medical - Devices
AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Devices | Household & Personal Products | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $216M | $7M | $118M | $102M | $882M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $158M | $31M | $296M | $56M | $375M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-18M | $-11M | $-6M | $-9M | $87M |
| Gross Margin | 64.0% | 57.8% | 64.9% | 67.5% | 77.8% |
| Operating Margin | -9.3% | -33.3% | -3.6% | -12.2% | 21.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 69.0x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $105M | $16M | $379M | $26M | $13M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $7M | $233M | $20M | $303M |
AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AirSculpt Technolog… (AIRS) | 100 | 30.6 | -69.4% |
| STRATA Skin Science… (SSKN) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| The Beauty Health C… (SKIN) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| Journey Medical Cor… (DERM) | 100 | 63.2 | -36.8% |
| InMode Ltd. (INMD) | 100 | 18.3 | -81.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AIRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +35.2% vs SSKN's -93.3%
SSKN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth 16.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.8%
- 0.6% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
SKIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, DERM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.04
- 105.0% 10Y total return vs DERM's -47.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
- Beta 1.04, current ratio 9.88x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 0.6% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 69.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.3% margin vs SSKN's -35.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs AIRS's 3.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.2% vs SSKN's -93.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.8% ROA vs SSKN's -35.9%, ROIC 13.5% vs -38.9% |
AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INMD leads in 3 of 6 categories
DERM leads 1 • AIRS leads 0 • SSKN leads 0 • SKIN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $375M annually — 12.1x SSKN's $31M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSKN's -35.6%. On growth, INMD holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $158M | $31M | $296M | $56M | $375M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$5M | $9M | -$3M | $81M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$18M | -$11M | -$6M | -$9M | $87M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$4M | $29M | -$3M | $91M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.0% | +57.8% | +64.9% | +67.5% | +77.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.3% | -33.3% | -3.6% | -12.2% | +21.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -35.6% | -2.0% | -15.5% | +23.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.6% | -11.3% | +9.8% | -4.8% | +24.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | -21.2% | -6.7% | +1.0% | +5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -50.0% | -5.9% | +38.0% | +5.9% | -30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, INMD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $216M | $7M | $118M | $102M | $882M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $313M | $16M | $264M | $108M | $593M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -24.71x | -0.67x | -5.69x | -6.94x | 9.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 68.97x | 9.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.98x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.06x | — | 7331.15x | — | 6.88x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.20x | 0.20x | 0.39x | 1.82x | 2.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.52x | 1.34x | 2.02x | 5.09x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.17x | — | 10.46x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INMD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INMD delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SSKN. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKIN scores 7/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.8% | -8.4% | -9.4% | -45.4% | +13.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.0% | -35.9% | -1.2% | -10.8% | +11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.8% | -38.9% | -6.8% | -56.8% | +13.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | -36.0% | -4.5% | -34.2% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.32x | 3.31x | 6.20x | 1.28x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $97M | $9M | $146M | $5M | -$289M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $7M | $233M | $20M | $303M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $105M | $16M | $379M | $26M | $13M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.82x | -4.63x | 0.81x | -1.52x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DERM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DERM five years ago would be worth $5,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $109 for SSKN. Over the past 12 months, AIRS leads with a +35.2% total return vs SSKN's -93.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 44.7% vs SSKN's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +87.0% | -86.2% | -35.0% | -32.9% | -5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.2% | -93.3% | -35.9% | -28.1% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.0% | -98.3% | -91.7% | +203.0% | -60.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.6% | -98.9% | -92.9% | -47.4% | -63.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.6% | -99.6% | -91.6% | -47.4% | +105.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.9% | -74.5% | -56.4% | +44.7% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SSKN and INMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SSKN is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIRS's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INMD currently trades 83.2% from its 52-week high vs SSKN's 4.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.37x | -0.24x | 2.00x | 1.82x | 1.04x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.00 | $3.86 | $2.69 | $9.55 | $16.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.51 | $0.11 | $0.76 | $4.31 | $12.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +28.8% | +4.5% | +33.8% | +52.3% | +83.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.0 | 41.6 | 52.1 | 44.3 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.1M | 14K | 760K | 230K | 804K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AIRS as "Hold", SKIN as "Hold", DERM as "Buy", INMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.0% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs 14.9% for INMD (target: $16). AIRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.00 | — | $1.30 | $11.75 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | — | 13 | 3 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.00 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +14.5% |
INMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DERM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?
On forward P/E, InMode Ltd.
is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?
Over the past 5 years, Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) delivered a total return of -47.
4%, compared to -98. 9% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (SSKN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INMD returned +105. 0% versus SSKN's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 24β versus AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning AIRS is approximately -1481% more volatile than SSKN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -242. 9% for Journey Medical Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIRS leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?
InMode Ltd.
(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -30. 1% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -27. 6% for SSKN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, InMode Ltd.
(INMD) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 69. 0x for Journey Medical Corporation — 59. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 135. 0% to $11. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?
In this comparison, AIRS (0.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SSKN, SKIN, DERM, INMD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
(SSKN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 24)). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSKN: -99. 6%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AIRS and SSKN and SKIN and DERM and INMD?
These companies operate in different sectors (AIRS (Healthcare) and SSKN (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and DERM (Healthcare) and INMD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AIRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.