Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AIRS
AirSculpt Technologies, Inc.

Medical - Care Facilities

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$216M
5Y Perf.-69.4%
SSKN
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-98.8%
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company

Household & Personal Products

Consumer DefensiveNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$118M
5Y Perf.-96.5%
DERM
Journey Medical Corporation

Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$102M
5Y Perf.-36.8%
INMD
InMode Ltd.

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$882M
5Y Perf.-81.7%

AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AIRS logoAIRS
SSKN logoSSKN
SKIN logoSKIN
DERM logoDERM
INMD logoINMD
IndustryMedical - Care FacilitiesMedical - DevicesHousehold & Personal ProductsDrug Manufacturers - Specialty & GenericMedical - Devices
Market Cap$216M$7M$118M$102M$882M
Revenue (TTM)$158M$31M$296M$56M$375M
Net Income (TTM)$-18M$-11M$-6M$-9M$87M
Gross Margin64.0%57.8%64.9%67.5%77.8%
Operating Margin-9.3%-33.3%-3.6%-12.2%21.3%
Forward P/E69.0x9.6x
Total Debt$105M$16M$379M$26M$13M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$7M$233M$20M$303M

AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMDLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AIRS
SSKN
SKIN
DERM
INMD
StockNov 21May 26Return
AirSculpt Technolog… (AIRS)10030.6-69.4%
STRATA Skin Science… (SSKN)1001.2-98.8%
The Beauty Health C… (SKIN)1003.5-96.5%
Journey Medical Cor… (DERM)10063.2-36.8%
InMode Ltd. (INMD)10018.3-81.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: INMD leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for dividend income and shareholder returns and recent price momentum and sentiment. SSKN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AIRS
AirSculpt Technologies, Inc.
The Income Pick

AIRS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.

  • 0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • +35.2% vs SSKN's -93.3%
Best for: dividends and momentum
SSKN
STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
The Growth Play

SSKN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 0.6%, EPS growth 16.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.8%
  • 0.6% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
Best for: growth exposure
SKIN
The Beauty Health Company
The Quality Angle

SKIN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer defensive exposure
DERM
Journey Medical Corporation
The Healthcare Pick

Among these 5 stocks, DERM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: healthcare exposure
INMD
InMode Ltd.
The Income Pick

INMD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • beta 1.04
  • 105.0% 10Y total return vs DERM's -47.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 9.88x
  • Beta 1.04, current ratio 9.88x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSSKN logoSSKN0.6% revenue growth vs DERM's -29.1%
ValueINMD logoINMDLower P/E (9.6x vs 69.0x)
Quality / MarginsINMD logoINMD23.3% margin vs SSKN's -35.6%
Stability / SafetyINMD logoINMDBeta 1.04 vs AIRS's 3.37, lower leverage
DividendsAIRS logoAIRS0.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AIRS logoAIRS+35.2% vs SSKN's -93.3%
Efficiency (ROA)INMD logoINMD11.8% ROA vs SSKN's -35.9%, ROIC 13.5% vs -38.9%

AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AIRSAirSculpt Technologies, Inc.
FY 2024
Reportable Segment
100.0%$180M
SSKNSTRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.
FY 2024
Dermatology Recurring Procedures
63.1%$21M
Dermatology Procedures Equipment
36.9%$12M
SKINThe Beauty Health Company
FY 2025
Consumables
70.7%$213M
Delivery Systems
29.3%$88M
DERMJourney Medical Corporation
FY 2024
Qbrexza
49.1%$25M
Accutane
37.9%$19M
Amzeeq
9.8%$5M
Zilxi
3.2%$2M
INMDInMode Ltd.
FY 2025
Capital Equipment
100.0%$289M

AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINMDLAGGINGSKIN

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

INMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $375M annually — 12.1x SSKN's $31M. INMD is the more profitable business, keeping 23.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SSKN's -35.6%. On growth, INMD holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAIRS logoAIRSAirSculpt Technol…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…DERM logoDERMJourney Medical C…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$158M$31M$296M$56M$375M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2M-$5M$9M-$3M$81M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$18M-$11M-$6M-$9M$87M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$2M-$4M$29M-$3M$91M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+64.0%+57.8%+64.9%+67.5%+77.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-9.3%-33.3%-3.6%-12.2%+21.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-11.4%-35.6%-2.0%-15.5%+23.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+1.6%-11.3%+9.8%-4.8%+24.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-17.8%-21.2%-6.7%+1.0%+5.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-50.0%-5.9%+38.0%+5.9%-30.8%
INMD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, INMD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIN's 7331.2x.

MetricAIRS logoAIRSAirSculpt Technol…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…DERM logoDERMJourney Medical C…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
Market CapShares × price$216M$7M$118M$102M$882M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$313M$16M$264M$108M$593M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-24.71x-0.67x-5.69x-6.94x9.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.68.97x9.64x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple31.06x7331.15x6.88x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.20x0.20x0.39x1.82x2.38x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.52x1.34x2.02x5.09x1.33x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.17x10.46x
INMD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

INMD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

INMD delivers a 13.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-8 for SSKN. INMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIN's 6.20x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKIN scores 7/9 vs DERM's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAIRS logoAIRSAirSculpt Technol…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…DERM logoDERMJourney Medical C…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-21.8%-8.4%-9.4%-45.4%+13.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-9.0%-35.9%-1.2%-10.8%+11.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.8%-38.9%-6.8%-56.8%+13.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.0%-36.0%-4.5%-34.2%+12.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–924723
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.32x3.31x6.20x1.28x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$97M$9M$146M$5M-$289M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$7M$233M$20M$303M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$105M$16M$379M$26M$13M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.82x-4.63x0.81x-1.52x
INMD leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

DERM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in DERM five years ago would be worth $5,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $109 for SSKN. Over the past 12 months, AIRS leads with a +35.2% total return vs SSKN's -93.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DERM at 44.7% vs SSKN's -74.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAIRS logoAIRSAirSculpt Technol…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…DERM logoDERMJourney Medical C…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+87.0%-86.2%-35.0%-32.9%-5.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.2%-93.3%-35.9%-28.1%-2.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.0%-98.3%-91.7%+203.0%-60.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.6%-98.9%-92.9%-47.4%-63.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.6%-99.6%-91.6%-47.4%+105.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-12.9%-74.5%-56.4%+44.7%-26.4%
DERM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SSKN and INMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SSKN is the less volatile stock with a -0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AIRS's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. INMD currently trades 83.2% from its 52-week high vs SSKN's 4.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAIRS logoAIRSAirSculpt Technol…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…DERM logoDERMJourney Medical C…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5003.37x-0.24x2.00x1.82x1.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.00$3.86$2.69$9.55$16.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.51$0.11$0.76$4.31$12.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+28.8%+4.5%+33.8%+52.3%+83.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.041.652.144.339.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded3.1M14K760K230K804K
Evenly matched — SSKN and INMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: AIRS as "Hold", SKIN as "Hold", DERM as "Buy", INMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 135.0% upside for DERM (target: $12) vs 14.9% for INMD (target: $16). AIRS is the only dividend payer here at 0.13% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAIRS logoAIRSAirSculpt Technol…SSKN logoSSKNSTRATA Skin Scien…SKIN logoSKINThe Beauty Health…DERM logoDERMJourney Medical C…INMD logoINMDInMode Ltd.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$6.00$1.30$11.75$16.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts513311
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%0.0%0.0%0.0%+14.5%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

INMD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DERM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallInMode Ltd. (INMD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AIRS vs SSKN vs SKIN vs DERM vs INMD: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.

(SSKN) is the stronger pick with 0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). InMode Ltd. (INMD) offers the better valuation at 9. 7x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?

On forward P/E, InMode Ltd.

is actually cheaper at 9. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?

Over the past 5 years, Journey Medical Corporation (DERM) delivered a total return of -47.

4%, compared to -98. 9% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. (SSKN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INMD returned +105. 0% versus SSKN's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.

(SSKN) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 24β versus AirSculpt Technologies, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning AIRS is approximately -1481% more volatile than SSKN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, InMode Ltd. (INMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 6% for The Beauty Health Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.

(SSKN) is pulling ahead at 0. 6% versus -29. 1% for Journey Medical Corporation (DERM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Beauty Health Company grew EPS 55. 6% year-over-year, compared to -242. 9% for Journey Medical Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIRS leads at 10. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?

InMode Ltd.

(INMD) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 3% net margin versus -30. 1% for STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INMD leads at 23. 0% versus -27. 6% for SSKN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — INMD leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, InMode Ltd.

(INMD) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 69. 0x for Journey Medical Corporation — 59. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DERM: 135. 0% to $11. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD?

In this comparison, AIRS (0.

1% yield) pays a dividend. SSKN, SKIN, DERM, INMD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AIRS or SSKN or SKIN or DERM or INMD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, STRATA Skin Sciences, Inc.

(SSKN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 24)). The Beauty Health Company (SKIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 00 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SSKN: -99. 6%, SKIN: -91. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AIRS and SSKN and SKIN and DERM and INMD?

These companies operate in different sectors (AIRS (Healthcare) and SSKN (Healthcare) and SKIN (Consumer Defensive) and DERM (Healthcare) and INMD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AIRS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SSKN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DERM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; INMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AIRS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SSKN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SKIN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DERM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 40%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

INMD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AIRS and SSKN and SKIN and DERM and INMD on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AIRS: -17.8% · SSKN: -21.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.