Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALCY vs PSFE vs BFLY vs BN vs KKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Medical - Devices
Asset Management
Asset Management
ALCY vs PSFE vs BFLY vs BN vs KKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Information Technology Services | Medical - Devices | Asset Management | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $119M | $485M | $1.11B | $104.40B | $89.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.70B | $103M | $77.66B | $19.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-183M | $-76M | $1.31B | $2.37B |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.4% | 49.2% | 40.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 5.6% | -79.5% | 39.9% | 2.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.8x | 4.3x | — | 16.7x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $530K | $2.66B | $20M | $263.42B | $54.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $181K | $1.35B | $150M | $16.24B | $6M |
ALCY vs PSFE vs BFLY vs BN vs KKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alchemy Investments… (ALCY) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| Paysafe Limited (PSFE) | 100 | 78.1 | -21.9% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 165.0 | +65.0% |
| Brookfield Corporat… (BN) | 100 | 199.9 | +99.9% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 169.0 | +69.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALCY vs PSFE vs BFLY vs BN vs KKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALCY has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 0.13x
- Beta 0.02 vs BFLY's 3.28, lower leverage
- 20.3% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC -1.5% vs -76.8%
PSFE is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 16.4x)
BFLY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0%
- +94.5% vs PSFE's -37.1%
Among these 5 stocks, BN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
KKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.70, yield 0.8%
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs BN's 308.9%
- Beta 1.70, yield 0.8%, current ratio 79.85x
- 12.3% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs KKR's -11.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.3% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs BFLY's 3.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 6-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.5% vs PSFE's -37.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.3% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC -1.5% vs -76.8% |
ALCY vs PSFE vs BFLY vs BN vs KKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ALCY vs PSFE vs BFLY vs BN vs KKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSFE leads in 1 of 6 categories
ALCY leads 1 • BN leads 1 • KKR leads 1 • BFLY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — BN and KKR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BN and ALCY operate at a comparable scale, with $77.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. KKR is the more profitable business, keeping 12.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BFLY's -73.6%. On growth, BFLY holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.7B | $103M | $77.7B | $19.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $371M | -$76M | $32.1B | $9.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$183M | -$76M | $1.3B | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$907,212 | $136M | -$19M | -$2.8B | $7.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.4% | +49.2% | +40.0% | +41.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +5.6% | -79.5% | +39.9% | +2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -10.7% | -73.6% | +1.7% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +8.0% | -18.3% | — | +49.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.4% | +25.0% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -170.4% | -183.3% | +16.0% | +73.1% | -1.7% |
Valuation Metrics
PSFE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.8x trailing earnings, ALCY trades at a 100% valuation discount to BN's 9999.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PSFE's 4.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $119M | $485M | $1.1B | $104.4B | $89.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $119M | $1.8B | $979M | $351.6B | $144.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.81x | -2.99x | -13.68x | 9999.00x | 42.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.30x | — | 16.69x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 4.53x | — | 8.53x | 20.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.29x | 11.37x | 1.34x | 4.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 23.38x | 0.83x | 5.35x | 0.66x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 2.17x | — | — | 9.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALCY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALCY delivers a 52.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $53 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. ALCY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PSFE's 4.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KKR scores 6/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +52.9% | -24.1% | -36.8% | +0.8% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +20.3% | -3.8% | -25.6% | +0.3% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.5% | +3.6% | -76.8% | +5.6% | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.8% | +3.6% | -39.3% | +7.2% | +0.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 4.06x | 0.10x | 1.59x | 0.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $348,826 | $1.3B | -$130M | $247.2B | $54.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $181,174 | $1.3B | $150M | $16.2B | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $530,000 | $2.7B | $20M | $263.4B | $54.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.99x | 0.84x | -71.59x | 1.64x | 3.29x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BN five years ago would be worth $18,928 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $582 for PSFE. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +94.5% total return vs PSFE's -37.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BN at 30.5% vs PSFE's -13.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.2% | +17.7% | +13.1% | -0.1% | -22.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.9% | -37.1% | +94.5% | +25.5% | -13.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | -34.9% | +100.9% | +122.1% | +107.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | -94.2% | -65.1% | +89.3% | +76.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.8% | -92.1% | -57.2% | +308.9% | +715.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | -13.3% | +26.2% | +30.5% | +27.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALCY and BN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALCY is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BN currently trades 93.8% from its 52-week high vs PSFE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.02x | 2.35x | 3.28x | 1.57x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.90 | $16.49 | $5.72 | $49.57 | $153.87 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.25 | $5.95 | $1.32 | $36.47 | $82.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.2% | +56.9% | +74.1% | +93.8% | +65.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.3 | 65.3 | 46.2 | 62.5 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2K | 361K | 6.4M | 5.9M | 6.5M |
Analyst Outlook
KKR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PSFE as "Buy", BFLY as "Buy", BN as "Buy", KKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.5% upside for KKR (target: $143) vs 6.5% for PSFE (target: $10). KKR is the only dividend payer here at 0.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $10.00 | $5.42 | $54.40 | $143.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 7 | 9 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 1 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.80 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +96.0% | +20.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
PSFE leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ALCY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ALCY vs PSFE vs BFLY vs BN vs KKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1 (ALCY) offers the better valuation at 27. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Paysafe Limited (PSFE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR?
On trailing P/E, Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1 (ALCY) is the cheapest at 27.
8x versus Brookfield Corporation at 9999. 0x. On forward P/E, Paysafe Limited is actually cheaper at 4. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR?
Over the past 5 years, Brookfield Corporation (BN) delivered a total return of +89.
3%, compared to -94. 2% for Paysafe Limited (PSFE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +715. 5% versus PSFE's -92. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1 (ALCY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
02β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 28β — meaning BFLY is approximately 16616% more volatile than ALCY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1 (ALCY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 4% for Paysafe Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -11. 0% for KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1 grew EPS 34. 4% year-over-year, compared to -972. 2% for Paysafe Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, BFLY leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR?
KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 3% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BN leads at 39. 9% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFLY leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Paysafe Limited (PSFE) trades at 4.
3x forward P/E versus 16. 7x for Brookfield Corporation — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 42. 5% to $143. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR?
In this comparison, KKR (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. ALCY, PSFE, BFLY, BN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALCY or PSFE or BFLY or BN or KKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alchemy Investments Acquisition Corp 1 (ALCY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
02)). Paysafe Limited (PSFE) carries a higher beta of 2. 35 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALCY: +16. 8%, PSFE: -92. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALCY and PSFE and BFLY and BN and KKR?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALCY (Financial Services) and PSFE (Technology) and BFLY (Healthcare) and BN (Financial Services) and KKR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALCY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PSFE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock; BN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. KKR pays a dividend while ALCY, PSFE, BFLY, BN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.