ALEX vs NXRT vs BRT vs CBRE

For growth investors, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 7% for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX). Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) offers the better valuation at 23. 4x trailing P/E (31. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) is the cheapest at 23. 4x versus CBRE Group, Inc. at 38. 1x. On forward P/E, CBRE Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 19. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. wins at 0. 49x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) delivered a total return of +68. 8%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CBRE returned +405. 3% versus ALEX's +75. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning CBRE is approximately 320% more volatile than ALEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 51% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CBRE Group, Inc.

(CBRE) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -12. 7% for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBRE Group, Inc. grew EPS 22. 6% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BRT leads at 11. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 3% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALEX leads at 32. 9% versus 3. 2% for CBRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (ALEX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 49x versus CBRE Group, Inc. 's 1. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, CBRE Group, Inc. (CBRE) trades at 19. 2x forward P/E versus 31. 1x for Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. — 11. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BRT: 42. 6% to $21. 00.

In this comparison, BRT (7.

1% yield), NXRT (7. 1% yield), ALEX (4. 3% yield) pay a dividend. CBRE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.

(ALEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALEX: +75. 5%, CBRE: +405. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ALEX is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CBRE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ALEX, NXRT, BRT pay a dividend while CBRE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.