Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALGT vs DAL vs UAL vs ULCC vs AAL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
ALGT vs DAL vs UAL vs ULCC vs AAL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $1.52B | $47.75B | $32.37B | $1.25B | $8.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.61B | $63.36B | $60.47B | $3.80B | $55.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $5.01B | $3.67B | $-366M | $202M |
| Gross Margin | 29.5% | 24.5% | 64.2% | 31.2% | 21.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 9.2% | 8.4% | -11.4% | 3.0% |
| Forward P/E | 19.5x | 13.6x | 10.7x | — | 77.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.86B | $21.08B | $31.04B | $5.46B | $35.97B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $173M | $4.31B | $5.94B | $671M | $1.69B |
ALGT vs DAL vs UAL vs ULCC vs AAL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allegiant Travel Co… (ALGT) | 100 | 34.9 | -65.1% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 155.8 | +55.8% |
| United Airlines Hol… (UAL) | 100 | 183.3 | +83.3% |
| Frontier Group Hold… (ULCC) | 100 | 25.8 | -74.2% |
| American Airlines G… (AAL) | 100 | 60.7 | -39.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALGT vs DAL vs UAL vs ULCC vs AAL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 81.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- 3.7% revenue growth vs ULCC's -1.4%
DAL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.93, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.93, current ratio 0.40x
- 7.9% margin vs ULCC's -9.6%
- Beta 1.93 vs ULCC's 2.84, lower leverage
UAL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 118.1% 10Y total return vs DAL's 87.4%
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 77.5x)
ULCC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AAL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.96, current ratio 0.50x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.7% revenue growth vs ULCC's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 77.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs ULCC's -9.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.93 vs ULCC's 2.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.0% vs AAL's +24.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs ULCC's -5.3%, ROIC 12.0% vs -2.3% |
ALGT vs DAL vs UAL vs ULCC vs AAL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALGT vs DAL vs UAL vs ULCC vs AAL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DAL leads in 5 of 6 categories
ALGT leads 0 • UAL leads 0 • ULCC leads 0 • AAL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.4B annually — 24.3x ALGT's $2.6B. DAL is the more profitable business, keeping 7.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ULCC's -9.6%. On growth, AAL holds the edge at +10.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $63.4B | $60.5B | $3.8B | $56.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $314M | $8.9B | $8.1B | -$300M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | $5.0B | $3.7B | -$366M | $202M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $75M | $3.8B | $3.2B | -$481M | $1.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.5% | +24.5% | +64.2% | +31.2% | +21.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +9.2% | +8.4% | -11.4% | +3.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +7.9% | +6.1% | -9.6% | +0.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +6.1% | +5.3% | -12.6% | +3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | +2.9% | +10.6% | +8.8% | +10.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.4% | +44.2% | +84.5% | -5.2% | +19.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ALGT and UAL each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, DAL trades at a 88% valuation discount to AAL's 77.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UAL's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AAL's 12.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.5B | $47.8B | $32.4B | $1.2B | $8.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.2B | $64.5B | $57.5B | $6.0B | $43.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -33.14x | 9.54x | 9.76x | -9.05x | 77.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.48x | 13.58x | 10.65x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.57x | 7.81x | 7.51x | — | 12.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.58x | 0.75x | 0.55x | 0.34x | 0.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.41x | 2.30x | 2.13x | 2.54x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.19x | 12.43x | 12.66x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UAL delivers a 24.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-89 for ULCC. DAL carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ULCC's 11.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UAL scores 8/9 vs ULCC's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.2% | +24.1% | +24.9% | -88.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.0% | +6.2% | +4.7% | -5.3% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +12.0% | +9.1% | -2.3% | +3.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | +11.4% | +9.3% | -3.2% | +3.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.77x | 1.02x | 2.03x | 11.13x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $16.8B | $25.1B | $4.8B | $34.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $173M | $4.3B | $5.9B | $671M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $21.1B | $31.0B | $5.5B | $36.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 9.69x | 4.61x | -29.29x | 2.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UAL five years ago would be worth $18,217 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,633 for ULCC. Over the past 12 months, DAL leads with a +63.0% total return vs AAL's +24.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DAL at 29.7% vs ULCC's -12.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -6.6% | +6.1% | -11.8% | +18.8% | -14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.4% | +63.0% | +32.3% | +55.6% | +24.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.1% | +118.3% | +117.4% | -33.0% | -8.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.4% | +61.9% | +82.2% | -73.7% | -40.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.1% | +87.4% | +118.1% | -71.2% | -55.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -6.8% | +29.7% | +29.5% | -12.5% | -2.8% |
Risk & Volatility
DAL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAL is the less volatile stock with a 1.93 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ULCC's 2.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAL currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs ALGT's 69.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.47x | 1.93x | 2.25x | 2.84x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $118.00 | $76.39 | $119.21 | $6.66 | $16.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $42.56 | $44.78 | $71.55 | $3.02 | $10.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.6% | +95.7% | +83.6% | +81.5% | +79.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 64.2 | 58.4 | 65.4 | 63.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 481K | 12.2M | 8.3M | 5.8M | 68.2M |
Analyst Outlook
DAL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALGT as "Hold", DAL as "Buy", UAL as "Buy", ULCC as "Hold", AAL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 36.5% upside for UAL (target: $136) vs 12.8% for DAL (target: $82). DAL is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.13 | $82.45 | $136.10 | $6.67 | $15.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 30 | 44 | 47 | 13 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.9% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.67 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.9% | 0.0% | +2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
DAL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
ALGT vs DAL vs UAL vs ULCC vs AAL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) is the stronger pick with 3.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL?
On trailing P/E, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus American Airlines Group Inc. at 77. 5x. On forward P/E, United Airlines Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL?
Over the past 5 years, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) delivered a total return of +82. 2%, compared to -73. 7% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UAL returned +118. 1% versus ULCC's -71. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 93β versus Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 84β — meaning ULCC is approximately 47% more volatile than DAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 11% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) is pulling ahead at 3.
7% versus -1. 4% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Allegiant Travel Company grew EPS 81. 6% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UAL leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL?
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 9% net margin versus -3. 7% for Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DAL leads at 9. 2% versus -4. 0% for ULCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UAL leads at 64. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
(UAL) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Allegiant Travel Company — 8. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UAL: 36. 5% to $136. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL?
In this comparison, DAL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ALGT, UAL, ULCC, AAL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALGT or DAL or UAL or ULCC or AAL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Delta Air Lines, Inc.
(DAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 9% yield). Frontier Group Holdings, Inc. (ULCC) carries a higher beta of 2. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAL: +87. 4%, ULCC: -71. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALGT and DAL and UAL and ULCC and AAL?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALGT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; UAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ULCC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AAL is a small-cap quality compounder stock. DAL pays a dividend while ALGT, UAL, ULCC, AAL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.