Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
ALK vs LUV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
ALK vs LUV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $4.64B | $20.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.24B | $28.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $100M | $817M |
| Gross Margin | 59.7% | 16.5% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 3.4% |
| Forward P/E | 46.6x | 15.6x |
| Total Debt | $6.89B | $5.98B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $627M | $3.23B |
ALK vs LUV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska Air Group, I… (ALK) | 100 | 118.5 | +18.5% |
| Southwest Airlines … (LUV) | 100 | 129.3 | +29.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALK vs LUV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.3%, EPS growth -71.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.9%
- 21.3% revenue growth vs LUV's 2.1%
LUV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 1.7%
- 10.9% 10Y total return vs ALK's -33.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.45, Low D/E 74.9%, current ratio 0.52x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.3% revenue growth vs LUV's 2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.6x vs 46.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.8% margin vs ALK's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.45 vs ALK's 2.16, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.5% vs ALK's -18.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs ALK's 0.5%, ROIC 3.0% vs 2.3% |
ALK vs LUV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALK vs LUV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUV is the larger business by revenue, generating $28.9B annually — 2.0x ALK's $14.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.8% (LUV) to 0.7% (ALK). On growth, LUV holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.2B | $28.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.1B | $2.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $100M | $817M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$339M | -$401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +59.7% | +16.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +3.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | +2.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | -1.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +12.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -67.3% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ALK leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 46.6x trailing earnings, ALK trades at a 11% valuation discount to LUV's 52.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ALK's 9.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LUV's 11.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.6B | $20.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.9B | $23.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 46.56x | 52.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.94x | 11.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.33x | 0.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.15x | 2.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LUV leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LUV delivers a 10.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $2 for ALK. LUV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.75x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALK's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LUV scores 8/9 vs ALK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.4% | +10.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.67x | 0.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.3B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $627M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.9B | $6.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.05x | 9.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LUV five years ago would be worth $7,253 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,043 for ALK. Over the past 12 months, LUV leads with a +41.5% total return vs ALK's -18.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUV at 13.8% vs ALK's -2.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -21.4% | +0.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.9% | +41.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.8% | +47.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.6% | -27.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.5% | +10.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.3% | +13.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LUV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LUV is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALK's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LUV currently trades 75.6% from its 52-week high vs ALK's 61.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.16x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $65.88 | $54.89 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $33.03 | $28.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +61.5% | +75.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.6 | 50.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 8.2M |
Analyst Outlook
LUV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ALK as "Buy" and LUV as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 65.4% upside for ALK (target: $67) vs 20.2% for LUV (target: $50). LUV is the only dividend payer here at 1.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $49.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 28 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +12.5% |
LUV leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
ALK vs LUV: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALK or LUV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is the stronger pick with 21. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV). Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK) offers the better valuation at 46. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALK or LUV?
On trailing P/E, Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is the cheapest at 46. 6x versus Southwest Airlines Co. at 52. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALK or LUV?
Over the past 5 years, Southwest Airlines Co.
(LUV) delivered a total return of -27. 5%, compared to -39. 6% for Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LUV returned +10. 9% versus ALK's -33. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALK or LUV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southwest Airlines Co.
(LUV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus Alaska Air Group, Inc. 's 2. 16β — meaning ALK is approximately 49% more volatile than LUV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 75% versus 167% for Alaska Air Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALK or LUV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is pulling ahead at 21. 3% versus 2. 1% for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Southwest Airlines Co. grew EPS 5. 3% year-over-year, compared to -71. 8% for Alaska Air Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALK leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALK or LUV?
Southwest Airlines Co.
(LUV) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 6% net margin versus 0. 7% for Alaska Air Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALK leads at 2. 1% versus 1. 5% for LUV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALK leads at 59. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALK or LUV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALK: 65.
4% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALK or LUV?
In this comparison, LUV (1.
7% yield) pays a dividend. ALK does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ALK or LUV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Southwest Airlines Co.
(LUV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 7% yield). Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK) carries a higher beta of 2. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LUV: +10. 9%, ALK: -33. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALK and LUV?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ALK is a small-cap high-growth stock; LUV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LUV pays a dividend while ALK does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.