Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALMU vs AMBA vs SLAB vs QCOM vs SWKS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$439M
5Y Perf.+1062.4%
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.28B
5Y Perf.+2.8%
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$7.17B
5Y Perf.+49.5%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$230.92B
5Y Perf.+73.2%
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.04B
5Y Perf.-30.2%

ALMU vs AMBA vs SLAB vs QCOM vs SWKS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALMU logoALMU
AMBA logoAMBA
SLAB logoSLAB
QCOM logoQCOM
SWKS logoSWKS
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$439M$3.28B$7.17B$230.92B$10.04B
Revenue (TTM)$5M$374M$785M$44.49B$4.04B
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$-80M$-65M$9.92B$361M
Gross Margin50.2%59.8%58.2%54.8%41.1%
Operating Margin-105.0%-23.6%-9.0%25.5%9.4%
Forward P/E98.0x80.3x20.4x13.4x
Total Debt$941K$5M$0.00$16.37B$1.20B
Cash & Equiv.$4M$145M$364M$7.84B$1.16B

ALMU vs AMBA vs SLAB vs QCOM vs SWKSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALMU
AMBA
SLAB
QCOM
SWKS
StockNov 22May 26Return
Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU)1001162.4+1062.4%
Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA)100102.8+2.8%
Silicon Laboratorie… (SLAB)100149.5+49.5%
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)100173.2+73.2%
Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS)10069.8-30.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALMU vs AMBA vs SLAB vs QCOM vs SWKS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SLAB and QCOM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. QUALCOMM Incorporated is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SWKS and ALMU also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ALMU
Aeluma, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ALMU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 11.2% 10Y total return vs QCOM's 382.4%
  • 407.9% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2%
Best for: long-term compounding
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, AMBA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
SLAB
Silicon Laboratories Inc.
The Growth Play

SLAB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 66.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.20, current ratio 4.69x
  • Beta 1.20 vs ALMU's 2.89
  • +95.8% vs SWKS's +3.4%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Quality Compounder

QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 22.3% margin vs ALMU's -52.5%
  • 18.4% ROA vs AMBA's -10.6%, ROIC 29.1% vs -22.5%
Best for: quality and efficiency
SWKS
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
The Income Pick

SWKS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 4.2%
  • Beta 1.30, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.33x
  • Lower P/E (13.4x vs 20.4x)
  • 4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthALMU logoALMU407.9% revenue growth vs SWKS's -2.2%
ValueSWKS logoSWKSLower P/E (13.4x vs 20.4x)
Quality / MarginsQCOM logoQCOM22.3% margin vs ALMU's -52.5%
Stability / SafetySLAB logoSLABBeta 1.20 vs ALMU's 2.89
DividendsSWKS logoSWKS4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.6%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SLAB logoSLAB+95.8% vs SWKS's +3.4%
Efficiency (ROA)QCOM logoQCOM18.4% ROA vs AMBA's -10.6%, ROIC 29.1% vs -22.5%

ALMU vs AMBA vs SLAB vs QCOM vs SWKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ALMUAeluma, Inc.
FY 2024
Sampling Purchases Member
100.0%$64,756
AMBAAmbarella, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SLABSilicon Laboratories Inc.
FY 2024
Industrial & Commercial
100.0%$339M
QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
FY 2025
QCT
87.3%$38.4B
QTL
12.7%$5.6B
SWKSSkyworks Solutions, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

ALMU vs AMBA vs SLAB vs QCOM vs SWKS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLQCOMLAGGINGAMBA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.5B annually — 8508.2x ALMU's $5M. QCOM is the more profitable business, keeping 22.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ALMU's -52.5%. On growth, AMBA holds the edge at +31.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5M$374M$785M$44.5B$4.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$5M-$72M-$32M$12.8B$842M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3M-$80M-$65M$9.9B$361M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$772,780$76M$66M$12.5B$697M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+50.2%+59.8%+58.2%+54.8%+41.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-105.0%-23.6%-9.0%+25.5%+9.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-52.5%-21.3%-8.3%+22.3%+8.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-14.8%+20.3%+8.4%+28.1%+17.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-21.1%+31.2%+25.2%-3.5%-1.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+54.2%+39.7%+88.8%+173.0%-44.2%
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 21.7x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 50% valuation discount to QCOM's 43.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than QCOM's 17.2x.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
Market CapShares × price$439M$3.3B$7.2B$230.9B$10.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$437M$3.1B$6.8B$239.5B$10.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-106.13x-26.87x-109.82x43.73x21.68x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.98.00x80.34x20.37x13.39x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate21.03x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.16x10.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue94.20x11.53x9.13x5.21x2.46x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.96x5.61x6.50x11.42x1.80x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF140.04x108.93x18.01x9.08x
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

QCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $-13 for AMBA. AMBA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALMU scores 6/9 vs SWKS's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-6.7%-13.5%-5.9%+40.2%+6.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.4%-10.6%-5.1%+18.4%+4.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital-18.6%-22.5%-6.9%+29.1%+6.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-19.5%-22.2%-6.3%+28.9%+7.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–966565
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.01x0.77x0.21x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$3M-$139M-$364M$8.5B$42M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$4M$145M$364M$7.8B$1.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$941,000$5M$0$16.4B$1.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-3.00x-58.63x17.60x14.46x
QCOM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ALMU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ALMU five years ago would be worth $122,050 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,800 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, SLAB leads with a +95.8% total return vs SWKS's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALMU at 82.7% vs SWKS's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+37.1%+1.5%+64.8%+27.2%+4.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+94.2%+44.4%+95.8%+53.4%+3.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+510.3%+13.8%+58.8%+111.7%-28.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1120.5%-12.4%+70.5%+82.3%-52.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1120.5%+99.4%+374.6%+382.4%+33.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+82.7%+4.4%+16.7%+28.4%-10.7%
ALMU leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SLAB is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALMU's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLAB currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs SWKS's 73.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.89x2.53x1.20x1.64x1.30x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.73$96.69$218.66$228.04$90.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.20$48.30$109.77$121.99$51.92
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+85.0%+78.9%+99.4%+96.1%+73.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.374.769.182.656.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M866K457K15.6M3.3M
SLAB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — QCOM and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ALMU as "Buy", AMBA as "Buy", SLAB as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", SWKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.9% upside for AMBA (target: $98) vs -15.3% for QCOM (target: $186). For income investors, SWKS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.18% vs QCOM's 1.57%.

MetricALMU logoALMUAeluma, Inc.AMBA logoAMBAAmbarella, Inc.SLAB logoSLABSilicon Laborator…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…SWKS logoSWKSSkyworks Solution…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$25.00$98.33$211.60$185.56$72.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts136376960
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+4.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises2312
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.44$2.79
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.8%+0.4%
Evenly matched — QCOM and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

QCOM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SWKS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallQUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALMU vs AMBA vs SLAB vs QCOM vs SWKS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) is the stronger pick with 407. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aeluma, Inc. (ALMU) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS?

On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS?

Over the past 5 years, Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) delivered a total return of +1121%, compared to -52. 0% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALMU returned +1120% versus SWKS's +33. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Silicon Laboratories Inc.

(SLAB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Aeluma, Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning ALMU is approximately 141% more volatile than SLAB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aeluma, Inc.

(ALMU) is pulling ahead at 407. 9% versus -2. 2% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Silicon Laboratories Inc. grew EPS 66. 6% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, QCOM leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS?

QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the more profitable company, earning 12.

5% net margin versus -64. 8% for Aeluma, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: QCOM leads at 27. 9% versus -45. 9% for ALMU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMBA leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 98. 0x for Ambarella, Inc. — 84. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMBA: 28. 9% to $98. 33.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS?

In this comparison, SWKS (4.

2% yield), QCOM (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ALMU, AMBA, SLAB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ALMU or AMBA or SLAB or QCOM or SWKS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.

(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 2% yield). Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) carries a higher beta of 2. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +33. 9%, AMBA: +99. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ALMU and AMBA and SLAB and QCOM and SWKS?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ALMU is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMBA is a small-cap high-growth stock; SLAB is a small-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SWKS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. QCOM, SWKS pay a dividend while ALMU, AMBA, SLAB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ALMU

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMBA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 15%
  • Gross Margin > 35%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLAB

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 12%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QCOM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SWKS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ALMU and AMBA and SLAB and QCOM and SWKS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ALMU: -21.1% · AMBA: 31.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.