Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALSN vs ASTE vs BWA vs DAN vs ETN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural - Machinery
Auto - Parts
Auto - Parts
Industrial - Machinery
ALSN vs ASTE vs BWA vs DAN vs ETN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Agricultural - Machinery | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $10.23B | $1.21B | $12.05B | $4.62B | $155.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.65B | $1.48B | $14.33B | $0.00 | $28.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $543M | $26M | $362M | $-33M | $3.99B |
| Gross Margin | 40.8% | 26.1% | 18.9% | 8.0% | 36.9% |
| Operating Margin | 24.1% | 3.7% | 9.6% | 2.8% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | 13.6x | 14.2x | 11.3x | 13.5x | 30.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.92B | $320M | $4.18B | $3.52B | $11.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.50B | $72M | $2.31B | $476M | $622M |
ALSN vs ASTE vs BWA vs DAN vs ETN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allison Transmissio… (ALSN) | 100 | 326.3 | +226.3% |
| Astec Industries, I… (ASTE) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) | 100 | 205.7 | +105.7% |
| Dana Incorporated (DAN) | 100 | 273.4 | +173.4% |
| Eaton Corporation p… (ETN) | 100 | 470.2 | +370.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALSN vs ASTE vs BWA vs DAN vs ETN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALSN is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.60 vs ETN's 1.22
- 14.9% margin vs DAN's 1.1%
Among these 5 stocks, ASTE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
BWA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 74.4%, current ratio 2.07x
- Beta 1.01, yield 0.9%, current ratio 2.07x
- Lower P/E (11.3x vs 30.0x)
- Beta 1.01 vs ASTE's 1.63
DAN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 1.1% yield, vs ETN's 1.0%
- +139.1% vs ALSN's +27.7%
ETN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 24 yrs, beta 1.42, yield 1.0%
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 10.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
- 6.1% 10Y total return vs ALSN's 373.8%
- 10.3% revenue growth vs DAN's -27.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs DAN's -27.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.3x vs 30.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs DAN's 1.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs ASTE's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, vs ETN's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +139.1% vs ALSN's +27.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs DAN's -0.4%, ROIC 13.6% vs 4.0% |
ALSN vs ASTE vs BWA vs DAN vs ETN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ALSN vs ASTE vs BWA vs DAN vs ETN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALSN leads in 3 of 6 categories
BWA leads 1 • ASTE leads 0 • DAN leads 0 • ETN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALSN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ETN and DAN operate at a comparable scale, with $28.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALSN is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DAN's 1.1%. On growth, ALSN holds the edge at +83.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.6B | $1.5B | $14.3B | $0 | $28.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $970M | $84M | $1.9B | $354M | $5.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $543M | $26M | $362M | -$33M | $4.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $713M | $44M | $1.6B | $298M | $4.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.8% | +26.1% | +18.9% | +8.0% | +36.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +3.7% | +9.6% | +2.8% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.9% | +1.7% | +2.5% | +1.1% | +14.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.5% | +3.0% | +11.1% | +4.0% | +16.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +83.6% | +20.3% | +0.5% | -3.7% | +16.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -40.4% | -90.3% | +61.1% | -120.0% | -9.4% |
Valuation Metrics
BWA leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.8x trailing earnings, ALSN trades at a 69% valuation discount to DAN's 54.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ALSN offers better value at 0.73x vs ETN's 1.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.2B | $1.2B | $12.0B | $4.6B | $155.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.7B | $1.5B | $13.9B | $7.7B | $165.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.79x | 31.55x | 45.45x | 54.00x | 38.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.60x | 14.17x | 11.28x | 13.54x | 30.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.73x | — | — | — | 1.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.63x | 14.36x | 6.81x | 13.44x | 27.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.40x | 0.86x | 0.84x | 0.62x | 5.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.60x | 1.80x | 2.24x | 5.23x | 7.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.77x | 56.50x | 10.22x | 15.51x | 34.67x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALSN delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-2 for DAN. ASTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DAN's 3.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BWA scores 8/9 vs DAN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +29.5% | +3.8% | +6.2% | -2.5% | +20.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.4% | +2.0% | +2.6% | -0.4% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.2% | +6.2% | +12.9% | +4.0% | +13.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.6% | +7.2% | +12.7% | +4.5% | +16.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.56x | 0.47x | 0.74x | 3.82x | 0.57x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | $248M | $1.9B | $3.0B | $10.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $72M | $2.3B | $476M | $622M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $320M | $4.2B | $3.5B | $11.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 64.20x | 5.48x | 10.46x | 0.77x | 16.38x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALSN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALSN five years ago would be worth $28,345 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,958 for ASTE. Over the past 12 months, DAN leads with a +139.1% total return vs ALSN's +27.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALSN at 37.9% vs ASTE's 9.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.7% | +19.0% | +25.1% | +39.0% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +27.7% | +40.5% | +94.2% | +139.1% | +33.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.2% | +31.7% | +50.8% | +153.6% | +141.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +183.5% | -20.4% | +28.7% | +36.4% | +182.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +373.8% | +22.1% | +114.1% | +210.7% | +608.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.9% | +9.6% | +14.7% | +36.4% | +34.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BWA and ETN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BWA is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ASTE's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ETN currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs ASTE's 80.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.63x | 1.01x | 1.37x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.42 | $65.65 | $70.08 | $39.56 | $435.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $76.01 | $36.43 | $29.41 | $14.48 | $296.93 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.6% | +80.7% | +83.0% | +87.4% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.9 | 39.1 | 65.7 | 49.3 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 814K | 227K | 2.3M | 1.1M | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DAN and ETN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ALSN as "Hold", ASTE as "Buy", BWA as "Buy", DAN as "Buy", ETN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.3% upside for BWA (target: $69) vs -32.1% for ASTE (target: $36). For income investors, DAN offers the higher dividend yield at 1.12% vs ALSN's 0.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $116.00 | $36.00 | $68.80 | $37.00 | $379.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 12 | 38 | 24 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +1.0% | +0.9% | +1.1% | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 24 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.07 | $0.51 | $0.55 | $0.39 | $4.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.2% | 0.0% | +4.2% | +14.1% | +1.2% |
ALSN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BWA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
ALSN vs ASTE vs BWA vs DAN vs ETN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) is the stronger pick with 10.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -27. 1% for Dana Incorporated (DAN). Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (13. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN?
On trailing P/E, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Dana Incorporated at 54. 0x. On forward P/E, BorgWarner Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 60x versus Eaton Corporation plc's 1. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN?
Over the past 5 years, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) delivered a total return of +183. 5%, compared to -20. 4% for Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ETN returned +608. 7% versus ASTE's +22. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BorgWarner Inc.
(BWA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Astec Industries, Inc. 's 1. 63β — meaning ASTE is approximately 61% more volatile than BWA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 4% for Dana Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) is pulling ahead at 10.
3% versus -27. 1% for Dana Incorporated (DAN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Astec Industries, Inc. grew EPS 784. 2% year-over-year, compared to -14. 7% for BorgWarner Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ETN leads at 9. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN?
Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 7% net margin versus 1. 1% for Dana Incorporated — meaning it keeps 20. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALSN leads at 32. 3% versus 2. 8% for DAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALSN leads at 48. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 60x versus Eaton Corporation plc's 1. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, BorgWarner Inc. (BWA) trades at 11. 3x forward P/E versus 30. 0x for Eaton Corporation plc — 18. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BWA: 18. 3% to $68. 80.
08Which pays a better dividend — ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dana Incorporated (DAN) offers the highest yield at 1. 1%, versus 0. 9% for Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc. (ALSN).
09Is ALSN or ASTE or BWA or DAN or ETN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Allison Transmission Holdings, Inc.
(ALSN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 0. 9% yield, +373. 8% 10Y return). Astec Industries, Inc. (ASTE) carries a higher beta of 1. 63 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALSN: +373. 8%, ASTE: +22. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ALSN and ASTE and BWA and DAN and ETN?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALSN (Consumer Cyclical) and ASTE (Industrials) and BWA (Consumer Cyclical) and DAN (Consumer Cyclical) and ETN (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALSN is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ASTE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BWA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DAN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ETN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.