Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ALTS vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ALTS
ALT5 Sigma Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10M
5Y Perf.-48.2%
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.40B
5Y Perf.+146.0%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.-58.5%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-65.6%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.14B
5Y Perf.+21.3%

ALTS vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ALTS logoALTS
CIFR logoCIFR
MARA logoMARA
BTBT logoBTBT
RIOT logoRIOT
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$10M$8.40B$4.83B$589M$9.14B
Revenue (TTM)$25M$224M$907M$164M$647M
Net Income (TTM)$33M$-898M$-1.31B$137M$-867M
Gross Margin39.9%28.4%-47.7%61.9%-15.6%
Operating Margin-90.1%-150.7%-90.6%16.8%-61.8%
Forward P/E9.2x
Total Debt$13M$2.77B$3.65B$14M$280M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$628M$547M$95M$234M

ALTS vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ALTS
CIFR
MARA
BTBT
RIOT
StockJul 24Apr 26Return
ALT5 Sigma Corporat… (ALTS)10051.8-48.2%
Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR)100246.0+146.0%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)10041.5-58.5%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10034.4-65.6%
Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT)100121.3+21.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ALTS vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. ALT5 Sigma Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. CIFR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
ALTS
ALT5 Sigma Corporation
The Quality Compounder

ALTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and stability is your priority.

  • 133.1% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
  • Beta 2.77 vs CIFR's 3.87, lower leverage
Best for: quality and stability
CIFR
Cipher Mining Inc.
The Banking Pick

CIFR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +5.8% vs ALTS's -84.9%
Best for: momentum
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 3.37, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 5.39x
  • Beta 3.37, yield 0.3%, current ratio 5.39x
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
The Banking Pick

RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.87
  • 7.9% 10Y total return vs ALTS's 204.5%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsALTS logoALTS133.1% margin vs CIFR's -367.2%
Stability / SafetyALTS logoALTSBeta 2.77 vs CIFR's 3.87, lower leverage
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CIFR logoCIFR+5.8% vs ALTS's -84.9%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs CIFR's -24.7%, ROIC 6.5% vs -11.7%

ALTS vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ALTSALT5 Sigma Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

CIFRCipher Mining Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining
100.0%$224M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
RIOTRiot Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Bitcoin Mining Segment
85.9%$576M
Engineering Segment
14.1%$94M

ALTS vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLALTSLAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — ALTS and BTBT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 36.4x ALTS's $25M. ALTS is the more profitable business, keeping 133.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CIFR's -3.7%.

MetricALTS logoALTSALT5 Sigma Corpor…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$25M$224M$907M$164M$647M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$19M-$203M$627M$166M-$450M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$33M-$898M-$1.3B$137M-$867M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$17M-$930M-$312M-$448M-$1.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+39.9%+28.4%-47.7%+61.9%-15.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-90.1%-150.7%-90.6%+16.8%-61.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+133.1%-3.7%-144.6%+17.3%-102.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-70.0%-3.1%-34.4%-65.3%-119.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+53.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.5%-154.5%-4.8%+2.8%-60.0%
Evenly matched — ALTS and BTBT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ALTS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricALTS logoALTSALT5 Sigma Corpor…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Market CapShares × price$10M$8.4B$4.8B$589M$9.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$15M$10.5B$7.9B$508M$9.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.53x-9.62x-3.44x9.15x-12.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.76x37.49x5.32x3.60x14.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.38x9.44x1.30x0.56x2.87x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.36x
ALTS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-116 for CIFR. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIFR's 3.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALTS scores 6/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricALTS logoALTSALT5 Sigma Corpor…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.1%-115.5%-30.5%+21.4%-28.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.0%-24.7%-17.1%+19.0%-21.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-40.4%-11.7%-9.0%+6.5%-8.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-28.0%-15.6%-12.1%+8.5%-11.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–963363
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.53x3.31x1.05x0.03x0.10x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$6M$2.1B$3.1B-$81M$46M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$628M$547M$95M$234M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$13M$2.8B$3.6B$14M$280M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense17.66x-32.12x4.73x-16.47x
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CIFR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CIFR five years ago would be worth $20,789 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, CIFR leads with a +584.9% total return vs ALTS's -84.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CIFR at 119.7% vs ALTS's -23.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricALTS logoALTSALT5 Sigma Corpor…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-29.3%+27.7%+28.2%-10.3%+70.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-84.9%+584.9%-4.7%-9.0%+207.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-55.2%+960.8%+36.1%-19.7%+129.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+8.9%+107.9%-59.5%-84.6%-27.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+204.5%+108.9%-51.6%-60.4%+787.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-23.5%+119.7%+10.8%-7.1%+32.0%
CIFR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — ALTS and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ALTS is the less volatile stock with a 2.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIFR's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ALTS's 7.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricALTS logoALTSALT5 Sigma Corpor…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.77x3.87x3.11x3.37x3.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.95$25.52$23.45$4.55$24.14
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.82$2.95$6.66$1.25$7.68
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+7.8%+81.1%+54.2%+40.2%+99.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10033.167.569.669.174.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.5M24.9M47.6M18.5M18.4M
Evenly matched — ALTS and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

RIOT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CIFR as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricALTS logoALTSALT5 Sigma Corpor…CIFR logoCIFRCipher Mining Inc.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.RIOT logoRIOTRiot Platforms, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.86$16.13$5.00$27.90
# AnalystsCovering analysts1219218
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises02
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.1%+1.0%0.0%+0.0%
RIOT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

ALTS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BTBT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ALTS vs CIFR vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT: Key Questions Answered

8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ALTS or CIFR or MARA or BTBT or RIOT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cipher Mining Inc. (CIFR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — ALTS or CIFR or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?

Over the past 5 years, Cipher Mining Inc.

(CIFR) delivered a total return of +107. 9%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus BTBT's -60. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — ALTS or CIFR or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS) is the lower-risk stock at 2.

77β versus Cipher Mining Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning CIFR is approximately 40% more volatile than ALTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for Cipher Mining Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — ALTS or CIFR or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -1435. 7% for Cipher Mining Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — ALTS or CIFR or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -367. 2% for Cipher Mining Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -150. 7% for CIFR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Which pays a better dividend — ALTS or CIFR or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. ALTS, CIFR, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

07

Is ALTS or CIFR or MARA or BTBT or RIOT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.

(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

08

What are the main differences between ALTS and CIFR and MARA and BTBT and RIOT?

These companies operate in different sectors (ALTS (Technology) and CIFR (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and BTBT (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ALTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CIFR is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ALTS

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 26%
  • Net Margin > 79%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CIFR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 24%
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RIOT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 35%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ALTS and CIFR and MARA and BTBT and RIOT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ALTS: 53.3% · CIFR: 48.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.