Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ALTS vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
ALTS vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $10M | $10.55B | $4.83B | $589M | $9.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25M | $140M | $907M | $164M | $647M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $-564M | $-1.31B | $137M | $-867M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 55.3% | -47.7% | 61.9% | -15.6% |
| Operating Margin | -90.1% | -54.4% | -90.6% | 16.8% | -61.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 9.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $13M | $491M | $3.65B | $14M | $280M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $274M | $547M | $95M | $234M |
ALTS vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 24 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ALT5 Sigma Corporat… (ALTS) | 100 | 51.8 | -48.2% |
| TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | 100 | 346.8 | +246.8% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 41.5 | -58.5% |
| Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) | 100 | 34.4 | -65.6% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 121.3 | +21.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ALTS vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ALTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.77, Low D/E 52.7%, current ratio 0.85x
- 133.1% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
- Beta 2.77 vs RIOT's 3.87
WULF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 3.25
- Beta 3.25, current ratio 5.43x
- +6.9% vs ALTS's -84.9%
MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
- NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2%
- Better valuation composite
RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.9% 10Y total return vs ALTS's 204.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs MARA's 38.2% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 133.1% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.77 vs RIOT's 3.87 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.9% vs ALTS's -84.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.0% ROA vs WULF's -23.0%, ROIC 6.5% vs -10.6% |
ALTS vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ALTS vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALTS leads in 1 of 6 categories
BTBT leads 1 • WULF leads 1 • RIOT leads 1 • MARA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ALTS and BTBT each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 36.4x ALTS's $25M. ALTS is the more profitable business, keeping 133.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25M | $140M | $907M | $164M | $647M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$19M | -$72M | $627M | $166M | -$450M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | -$564M | -$1.3B | $137M | -$867M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$17M | -$677M | -$312M | -$448M | -$1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.9% | +55.3% | -47.7% | +61.9% | -15.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -90.1% | -54.4% | -90.6% | +16.8% | -61.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +133.1% | -51.7% | -144.6% | +17.3% | -102.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -70.0% | -2.1% | -34.4% | -65.3% | -119.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.3% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.5% | -17.7% | -4.8% | +2.8% | -60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ALTS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10M | $10.5B | $4.8B | $589M | $9.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15M | $10.8B | $7.9B | $508M | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.53x | -114.38x | -3.44x | 9.15x | -12.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 8.49x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.76x | 75.33x | 5.32x | 3.60x | 14.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.38x | 34.52x | 1.30x | 0.56x | 2.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.36x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-2 for WULF. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WULF's 2.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALTS scores 6/9 vs RIOT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | -2.3% | -30.5% | +21.4% | -28.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | -23.0% | -17.1% | +19.0% | -21.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -40.4% | -10.6% | -9.0% | +6.5% | -8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -28.0% | -15.9% | -12.1% | +8.5% | -11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.53x | 2.01x | 1.05x | 0.03x | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6M | $217M | $3.1B | -$81M | $46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $274M | $547M | $95M | $234M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $491M | $3.6B | $14M | $280M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.66x | -27.06x | 4.73x | — | -16.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WULF leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WULF five years ago would be worth $28,202 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, WULF leads with a +687.5% total return vs ALTS's -84.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WULF at 143.2% vs ALTS's -23.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.3% | +88.5% | +28.2% | -10.3% | +70.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -84.9% | +687.5% | -4.7% | -9.0% | +207.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -55.2% | +1338.3% | +36.1% | -19.7% | +129.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.9% | +182.0% | -59.5% | -84.6% | -27.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.5% | +161.2% | -51.6% | -60.4% | +787.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.5% | +143.2% | +10.8% | -7.1% | +32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ALTS and RIOT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALTS is the less volatile stock with a 2.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RIOT's 3.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RIOT currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs ALTS's 7.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.77x | 3.25x | 3.11x | 3.37x | 3.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.95 | $25.75 | $23.45 | $4.55 | $24.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.82 | $2.89 | $6.66 | $1.25 | $7.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.8% | +93.3% | +54.2% | +40.2% | +99.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.1 | 73.6 | 69.6 | 69.1 | 74.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 30.4M | 47.6M | 18.5M | 18.4M |
Analyst Outlook
RIOT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WULF as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 15.7% for RIOT (target: $28). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.13 | $16.13 | $5.00 | $27.90 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 19 | 2 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.01 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.0% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
ALTS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). BTBT leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
ALTS vs WULF vs MARA vs BTBT vs RIOT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ALTS or WULF or MARA or BTBT or RIOT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — ALTS or WULF or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?
Over the past 5 years, TeraWulf Inc.
(WULF) delivered a total return of +182. 0%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +787. 3% versus BTBT's -60. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — ALTS or WULF or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ALT5 Sigma Corporation (ALTS) is the lower-risk stock at 2.
77β versus Riot Platforms, Inc. 's 3. 87β — meaning RIOT is approximately 40% more volatile than ALTS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for TeraWulf Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — ALTS or WULF or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 38. 2% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — ALTS or WULF or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?
Bit Digital, Inc.
(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -90. 6% for MARA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — ALTS or WULF or MARA or BTBT or RIOT?
In this comparison, BTBT (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. ALTS, WULF, MARA, RIOT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is ALTS or WULF or MARA or BTBT or RIOT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.
(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+787. 3% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +787. 3%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between ALTS and WULF and MARA and BTBT and RIOT?
These companies operate in different sectors (ALTS (Technology) and WULF (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and BTBT (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ALTS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WULF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.