AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
Oil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$10.05B
5Y Perf.+342.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
AM vs CTRA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$24.72B
5Y Perf.+64.1%
AM vs CTRA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | AM | CTRA |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $10.05B | $24.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.29B | $6.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $411M | $1.67B |
| Gross Margin | 64.5% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 57.6% | 30.7% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.22B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $180M | $119M |
AM vs CTRA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
AM
CTRA
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antero Midstream Co… (AM) | 100 | 442.7 | +342.7% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 164.1 | +64.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AM vs CTRA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Coterra Energy Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AM
Antero Midstream Corporation
The Income Pick
AM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 4.3%
- Rev growth 7.0%, EPS growth 3.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.3%
- Beta 0.19, yield 4.3%, current ratio 3.41x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CTRA
Coterra Energy Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
CTRA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 70.1% 10Y total return vs AM's -14.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, Low D/E 27.0%, current ratio 1.19x
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.1x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AM | 7.0% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% |
| Value | CTRA | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | AM | 31.9% margin vs CTRA's 25.7% |
| Stability / Safety | CTRA | Beta 0.03 vs AM's 0.19, lower leverage |
| Dividends | AM | 4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs CTRA's 2.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | CTRA | +45.8% vs AM's +26.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AM | 6.9% ROA vs CTRA's 6.9%, ROIC 9.4% vs 10.9% |
AM vs CTRA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
AM vs CTRA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMLAGGINGCTRA
CTRACoterra Energy Inc.
1leads
AMAntero Midstream Corp…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CTRAMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AM6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CTRA4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AM5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
AM1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.5B annually — 5.0x AM's $1.3B. AM is the more profitable business, keeping 31.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTRA's 25.7%. On growth, AM holds the edge at +8.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | AMAntero Midstream … | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $6.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $951M | $4.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $411M | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $916M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.5% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +57.6% | +30.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +31.9% | +25.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +71.2% | +40.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | -43.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | 0.0% | -10.3% |
AM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, CTRA trades at a 41% valuation discount to AM's 24.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTRA's 5.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AM's 15.4x.
| Metric | AMAntero Midstream … | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $10.1B | $24.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.1B | $28.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.60x | 14.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.14x | 11.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.41x | 5.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.98x | 8.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.17x | 1.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.05x | 15.13x |
CTRA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AM delivers a 20.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $11 for CTRA. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AM's 1.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AM scores 8/9 vs CTRA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | AMAntero Midstream … | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +11.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.9% | +6.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.4% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.2% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.63x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $3.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $180M | $119M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.2B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.07x | 8.88x |
AM leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — AM and CTRA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AM five years ago would be worth $28,105 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $22,893 for CTRA. Over the past 12 months, CTRA leads with a +45.8% total return vs AM's +26.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AM at 32.1% vs CTRA's 12.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | AMAntero Midstream … | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.5% | +23.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +26.0% | +45.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.5% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +181.1% | +128.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.0% | +70.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.1% | +12.2% |
Evenly matched — AM and CTRA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AM and CTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AM's 0.19 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | AMAntero Midstream … | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 0.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $23.84 | $36.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.77 | $22.33 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +88.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.3 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 10.1M |
Evenly matched — AM and CTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
AM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AM as "Hold" and CTRA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 4.5% upside for CTRA (target: $34) vs 1.6% for AM (target: $22). For income investors, AM offers the higher dividend yield at 4.30% vs CTRA's 2.75%.
| Metric | AMAntero Midstream … | CTRACoterra Energy In… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.50 | $34.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 55 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.91 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | +0.6% |
AM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
AM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CTRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallAntero Midstream Corporation (AM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
AM vs CTRA: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AM or CTRA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is the stronger pick with 7.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) a "Buy" — based on 55 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AM or CTRA?
On trailing P/E, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Antero Midstream Corporation at 24. 6x. On forward P/E, Coterra Energy Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AM or CTRA?
Over the past 5 years, Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) delivered a total return of +181.
1%, compared to +128. 9% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTRA returned +70. 1% versus AM's -14. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AM or CTRA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 03β versus Antero Midstream Corporation's 0. 19β — meaning AM is approximately 521% more volatile than CTRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 163% for Antero Midstream Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AM or CTRA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) is pulling ahead at 7.
0% versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Coterra Energy Inc. grew EPS 49. 0% year-over-year, compared to 3. 6% for Antero Midstream Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AM leads at 8. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AM or CTRA?
Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 4% net margin versus 32. 8% for Antero Midstream Corporation — meaning it keeps 62. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89. 1% versus 51. 2% for AM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AM leads at 65. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AM or CTRA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 19. 1x for Antero Midstream Corporation — 7. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTRA: 4. 5% to $34. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AM or CTRA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 2. 8% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA).
09Is AM or CTRA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 03), 2. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTRA: +70. 1%, AM: -14. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AM and CTRA?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AM is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CTRA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(AM: 8.6% · CTRA: -43.3%)Net Margin>
%
(AM: 31.9% · CTRA: 25.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(AM: 24.6x · CTRA: 14.5x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.