Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMBP vs CCK vs ATI vs SLGN vs AA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • LU
Market Cap$2.36B
5Y Perf.-60.8%
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$11.35B
5Y Perf.+31.6%
ATI
ATI Inc.

Manufacturing - Metal Fabrication

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$22.26B
5Y Perf.+1764.6%
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.

Packaging & Containers

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.25B
5Y Perf.+9.5%
AA
Alcoa Corporation

Aluminum

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$16.22B
5Y Perf.+438.5%

AMBP vs CCK vs ATI vs SLGN vs AA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMBP logoAMBP
CCK logoCCK
ATI logoATI
SLGN logoSLGN
AA logoAA
IndustryPackaging & ContainersPackaging & ContainersManufacturing - Metal FabricationPackaging & ContainersAluminum
Market Cap$2.36B$11.35B$22.26B$4.25B$16.22B
Revenue (TTM)$5.73B$12.37B$4.59B$6.58B$12.74B
Net Income (TTM)$11M$737M$426M$283M$1.15B
Gross Margin10.0%18.3%22.5%17.4%13.6%
Operating Margin4.9%13.2%14.5%9.8%7.6%
Forward P/E16.0x12.5x37.9x10.6x9.0x
Total Debt$4.42B$6.17B$1.95B$4.62B$1M
Cash & Equiv.$522M$879M$417M$1.08B$1.60B

AMBP vs CCK vs ATI vs SLGN vs AALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMBP
CCK
ATI
SLGN
AA
StockSep 20May 26Return
Ardagh Metal Packag… (AMBP)10039.2-60.8%
Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK)100131.6+31.6%
ATI Inc. (ATI)1001864.6+1764.6%
Silgan Holdings Inc. (SLGN)100109.5+9.5%
Alcoa Corporation (AA)100538.5+438.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMBP vs CCK vs ATI vs SLGN vs AA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMBP and ATI are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. ATI Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. AA and CCK also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMBP
Ardagh Metal Packaging S.A.
The Growth Play

AMBP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 59.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.4%
  • 12.0% revenue growth vs AA's 4.5%
  • 11.1% yield, vs SLGN's 2.0%
Best for: growth exposure
CCK
Crown Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CCK is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.48, current ratio 1.03x
  • Beta 0.48 vs AA's 1.77
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
ATI
ATI Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ATI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 10.5% 10Y total return vs AA's 203.5%
  • 9.3% margin vs AMBP's 0.2%
  • 8.4% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 14.5% vs 6.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
SLGN
Silgan Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

SLGN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 2.0%
  • Beta 0.66, yield 2.0%, current ratio 1.22x
Best for: income & stability and defensive
AA
Alcoa Corporation
The Value Play

AA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and momentum.

  • Lower P/E (9.0x vs 10.6x)
  • +158.3% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Best for: value and momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMBP logoAMBP12.0% revenue growth vs AA's 4.5%
ValueAA logoAALower P/E (9.0x vs 10.6x)
Quality / MarginsATI logoATI9.3% margin vs AMBP's 0.2%
Stability / SafetyCCK logoCCKBeta 0.48 vs AA's 1.77
DividendsAMBP logoAMBP11.1% yield, vs SLGN's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)AA logoAA+158.3% vs SLGN's -23.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ATI logoATI8.4% ROA vs AMBP's 0.2%, ROIC 14.5% vs 6.5%

AMBP vs CCK vs ATI vs SLGN vs AA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMBPArdagh Metal Packaging S.A.

Segment breakdown not available.

CCKCrown Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Beverage Cans And Ends
69.0%$8.5B
Transit Packaging
16.4%$2.0B
Metal Food Cans And Ends
7.6%$943M
Other Metal Packaging
3.5%$433M
Other Products
3.5%$428M
ATIATI Inc.
FY 2025
High Performance Materials & Components
53.2%$2.7B
Advanced Alloys & Solutions
46.8%$2.3B
SLGNSilgan Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Metal Containers
48.4%$3.1B
Dispensing and Specialty Closures
41.8%$2.7B
Custom Containers
9.8%$638M
AAAlcoa Corporation
FY 2024
Aluminum
51.1%$7.2B
Alumina
48.9%$6.9B

AMBP vs CCK vs ATI vs SLGN vs AA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLATILAGGINGAA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ATI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AA is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.7B annually — 2.8x ATI's $4.6B. ATI is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMBP's 0.2%. On growth, AMBP holds the edge at +18.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…CCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…ATI logoATIATI Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.7B$12.4B$4.6B$6.6B$12.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$753M$2.1B$837M$966M$1.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11M$737M$426M$283M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$209M$1.1B$552M$307M$567M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+10.0%+18.3%+22.5%+17.4%+13.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+4.9%+13.2%+14.5%+9.8%+7.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+0.2%+6.0%+9.3%+4.3%+9.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+3.6%+8.9%+12.0%+4.7%+4.5%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.6%+7.7%+0.6%+6.5%-13.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.0%-56.6%+26.9%-6.3%+11.8%
ATI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 14.1x trailing earnings, AA trades at a 75% valuation discount to ATI's 57.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCK's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATI's 29.3x.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…CCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…ATI logoATIATI Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
Market CapShares × price$2.4B$11.3B$22.3B$4.3B$16.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6.3B$16.6B$23.8B$7.8B$14.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-214.95x15.85x57.05x14.91x14.11x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.97x12.46x37.92x10.60x8.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.05x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.47x7.96x29.30x7.97x9.17x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.43x0.92x4.85x0.66x1.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.36x12.03x1.89x2.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.92x10.34x66.72x10.07x28.60x
AMBP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — ATI and AA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

ATI delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $12 for SLGN. AA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLGN's 2.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATI scores 8/9 vs AMBP's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…CCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…ATI logoATIATI Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+21.8%+22.7%+12.5%+18.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.2%+5.2%+8.4%+3.0%+7.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.5%+14.1%+14.5%+8.7%+12.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+6.9%+16.0%+15.6%+9.9%+8.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–967887
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.77x1.02x2.03x0.00x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.9B$5.3B$1.5B$3.5B-$1.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$522M$879M$417M$1.1B$1.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$4.4B$6.2B$1.9B$4.6B$1M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.08x4.00x6.78x3.36x7.85x
Evenly matched — ATI and AA each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ATI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ATI five years ago would be worth $67,270 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,388 for AMBP. Over the past 12 months, AA leads with a +158.3% total return vs SLGN's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ATI at 62.7% vs SLGN's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…CCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…ATI logoATIATI Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-2.3%-2.6%+36.4%-1.9%+10.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+20.2%+5.3%+133.1%-23.7%+158.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+34.6%+23.5%+330.9%-11.1%+73.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.1%-6.9%+572.7%+1.4%+56.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.4%+98.0%+1050.2%+80.8%+203.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+10.4%+7.3%+62.7%-3.8%+20.1%
ATI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CCK and ATI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CCK is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AA's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ATI currently trades 95.0% from its 52-week high vs SLGN's 70.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…CCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…ATI logoATIATI Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.81x0.48x1.51x0.66x1.77x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.03$116.62$171.11$57.04$75.70
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.29$89.21$68.63$36.15$24.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.6%+86.7%+95.0%+70.6%+82.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.546.961.051.144.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.5M984K1.9M769K5.4M
Evenly matched — CCK and ATI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — AMBP and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AMBP as "Hold", CCK as "Buy", ATI as "Buy", SLGN as "Buy", AA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for SLGN (target: $51) vs 6.6% for ATI (target: $173). For income investors, AMBP offers the higher dividend yield at 11.08% vs AA's 0.63%.

MetricAMBP logoAMBPArdagh Metal Pack…CCK logoCCKCrown Holdings, I…ATI logoATIATI Inc.SLGN logoSLGNSilgan Holdings I…AA logoAAAlcoa Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.52$120.50$173.40$50.50$68.80
# AnalystsCovering analysts625292142
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.1%+1.0%+0.1%+2.0%+0.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises080210
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.44$1.04$0.09$0.80$0.39
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.4%+2.1%+1.6%0.0%
Evenly matched — AMBP and SLGN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ATI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). AMBP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.

Best OverallATI Inc. (ATI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMBP vs CCK vs ATI vs SLGN vs AA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Ardagh Metal Packaging S.

A. (AMBP) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for Alcoa Corporation (AA). Alcoa Corporation (AA) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (9. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crown Holdings, Inc. (CCK) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA?

On trailing P/E, Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the cheapest at 14.

1x versus ATI Inc. at 57. 0x. On forward P/E, Alcoa Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA?

Over the past 5 years, ATI Inc.

(ATI) delivered a total return of +572. 7%, compared to -46. 1% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. (AMBP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ATI returned +1050% versus AMBP's -44. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Crown Holdings, Inc.

(CCK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 48β versus Alcoa Corporation's 1. 77β — meaning AA is approximately 269% more volatile than CCK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 2% for Silgan Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardagh Metal Packaging S.

A. (AMBP) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus 4. 5% for Alcoa Corporation (AA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alcoa Corporation grew EPS 1486% year-over-year, compared to 4. 7% for Silgan Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ATI leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA?

Alcoa Corporation (AA) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

0% net margin versus 0. 2% for Ardagh Metal Packaging S. A. — meaning it keeps 9. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ATI leads at 13. 8% versus 5. 0% for AMBP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ATI leads at 21. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Alcoa Corporation (AA) trades at 9.

0x forward P/E versus 37. 9x for ATI Inc. — 28. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLGN: 25. 4% to $50. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA?

In this comparison, AMBP (11.

1% yield), SLGN (2. 0% yield), CCK (1. 0% yield), AA (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ATI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AMBP or CCK or ATI or SLGN or AA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Crown Holdings, Inc.

(CCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 48), 1. 0% yield). Alcoa Corporation (AA) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CCK: +98. 0%, AA: +203. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMBP and CCK and ATI and SLGN and AA?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMBP (Consumer Cyclical) and CCK (Consumer Cyclical) and ATI (Industrials) and SLGN (Consumer Cyclical) and AA (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMBP is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CCK is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ATI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SLGN is a small-cap deep-value stock; AA is a mid-cap deep-value stock. AMBP, CCK, SLGN, AA pay a dividend while ATI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMBP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CCK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLGN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AA

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMBP and CCK and ATI and SLGN and AA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMBP: 18.6% · CCK: 7.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.