Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMBR vs HUT vs MARA vs BTBT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMBR
Amber International Holding Ltd

Real Estate - Development

Real EstateNASDAQ • SG
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-81.6%
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$11.22B
5Y Perf.+770.7%
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.83B
5Y Perf.+10.4%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-9.4%

AMBR vs HUT vs MARA vs BTBT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMBR logoAMBR
HUT logoHUT
MARA logoMARA
BTBT logoBTBT
IndustryReal Estate - DevelopmentFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital MarketsFinancial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$8M$11.22B$4.83B$589M
Revenue (TTM)$100M$15M$907M$164M
Net Income (TTM)$-4M$-312M$-1.31B$137M
Gross Margin41.0%-6.1%-47.7%61.9%
Operating Margin-31.4%-21.0%-90.6%16.8%
Forward P/E14.7x9.2x
Total Debt$3M$429M$3.65B$14M
Cash & Equiv.$20M$45M$547M$95M

AMBR vs HUT vs MARA vs BTBTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMBR
HUT
MARA
BTBT
StockMar 25May 26Return
Amber International… (AMBR)10018.4-81.6%
Hut 8 Corp. (HUT)100870.7+770.7%
Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA)100110.4+10.4%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10090.6-9.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMBR vs HUT vs MARA vs BTBT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Amber International Holding Ltd is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. HUT also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMBR
Amber International Holding Ltd
The Real Estate Income Play

AMBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • beta 1.99
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.99, Low D/E 21.1%, current ratio 1.45x
  • Beta 1.99, current ratio 1.45x
  • Beta 1.99 vs HUT's 4.51, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
HUT
Hut 8 Corp.
The Banking Pick

HUT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 462.4% 10Y total return vs MARA's -51.6%
  • +7.0% vs AMBR's -77.5%
Best for: long-term compounding
MARA
Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
The Financial Play

MARA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • NIM 0.1% vs MARA's 0.1%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7%
  • Better valuation composite
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs HUT's -90.7%
ValueBTBT logoBTBTBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs HUT's -15.0%
Stability / SafetyAMBR logoAMBRBeta 1.99 vs HUT's 4.51, lower leverage
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)HUT logoHUT+7.0% vs AMBR's -77.5%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs MARA's -17.1%, ROIC 6.5% vs -9.0%

AMBR vs HUT vs MARA vs BTBT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMBRAmber International Holding Ltd
FY 2024
Marketing Solutions
71.7%$24M
Enterprise Solutions
28.3%$9M
HUTHut 8 Corp.
FY 2025
High Performance Computing, Colocation And Cloud
86.1%$202M
Power
9.9%$23M
Digital Infrastructure
4.1%$10M
MARAMarathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosting Services
100.0%$5M
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260

AMBR vs HUT vs MARA vs BTBT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBTBTLAGGINGMARA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

MARA is the larger business by revenue, generating $907M annually — 60.1x HUT's $15M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HUT's -15.0%.

MetricAMBR logoAMBRAmber Internation…HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$100M$15M$907M$164M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$16M-$389M$627M$166M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$4M-$312M-$1.3B$137M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$1M-$892M-$312M-$448M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+41.0%-6.1%-47.7%+61.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-31.4%-21.0%-90.6%+16.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.8%-15.0%-144.6%+17.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.4%-22.7%-34.4%-65.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+58.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+75.0%-52.3%-4.8%+2.8%
BTBT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMBR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricAMBR logoAMBRAmber Internation…HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$8M$11.2B$4.8B$589M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$9M$11.6B$7.9B$508M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.16x-47.28x-3.44x9.15x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.14.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.24x743.95x5.32x3.60x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.31x6.31x1.30x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
AMBR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. BTBT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BTBT scores 6/9 vs HUT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAMBR logoAMBRAmber Internation…HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-7.3%-17.7%-30.5%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.1%-11.2%-17.1%+19.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-88.1%-13.8%-9.0%+6.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-58.1%-17.0%-12.1%+8.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94236
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.21x0.25x1.05x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$17M$384M$3.1B-$81M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$20M$45M$547M$95M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3M$429M$3.6B$14M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-46.11x-9.18x4.73x
BTBT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HUT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HUT five years ago would be worth $39,601 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,543 for BTBT. Over the past 12 months, HUT leads with a +699.2% total return vs AMBR's -77.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUT at 124.4% vs AMBR's -34.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMBR logoAMBRAmber Internation…HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+10.6%+97.3%+28.2%-10.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-77.5%+699.2%-4.7%-9.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.8%+1030.5%+36.1%-19.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.8%+296.0%-59.5%-84.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-71.8%+462.4%-51.6%-60.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-34.4%+124.4%+10.8%-7.1%
HUT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMBR and HUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMBR is the less volatile stock with a 1.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUT's 4.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUT currently trades 90.9% from its 52-week high vs AMBR's 17.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMBR logoAMBRAmber Internation…HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.99x4.51x3.11x3.37x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.84$111.33$23.45$4.55
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.23$12.45$6.66$1.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+17.1%+90.9%+54.2%+40.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10042.282.569.669.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded62K4.6M47.6M18.5M
Evenly matched — AMBR and HUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: AMBR as "Buy", HUT as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs -22.4% for HUT (target: $79). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAMBR logoAMBRAmber Internation…HUT logoHUTHut 8 Corp.MARA logoMARAMarathon Digital …BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$3.50$78.50$16.13$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts515192
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+1.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BTBT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMBR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMBR vs HUT vs MARA vs BTBT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMBR or HUT or MARA or BTBT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — AMBR or HUT or MARA or BTBT?

Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.

(HUT) delivered a total return of +296. 0%, compared to -84. 6% for Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUT returned +462. 4% versus AMBR's -71. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — AMBR or HUT or MARA or BTBT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amber International Holding Ltd (AMBR) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

99β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 51β — meaning HUT is approximately 127% more volatile than AMBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — AMBR or HUT or MARA or BTBT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus -90. 7% for Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — AMBR or HUT or MARA or BTBT?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -1499. 6% for Hut 8 Corp. — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BTBT leads at 16. 8% versus -21. 0% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BTBT leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is AMBR or HUT or MARA or BTBT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.

2% to $5. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — AMBR or HUT or MARA or BTBT?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. AMBR, HUT, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is AMBR or HUT or MARA or BTBT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hut 8 Corp.

(HUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+462. 4% 10Y return). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUT: +462. 4%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between AMBR and HUT and MARA and BTBT?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMBR (Real Estate) and HUT (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and BTBT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMBR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 29%
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HUT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MARA

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMBR and HUT and MARA and BTBT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMBR: 58.7% · HUT: -90.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.