Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMC vs MCS vs CNK vs IMAX vs NFLX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMC
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$930M
5Y Perf.-97.0%
MCS
The Marcus Corporation

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$569M
5Y Perf.+35.5%
CNK
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.21B
5Y Perf.+82.8%
IMAX
IMAX Corporation

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNYSE • CA
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.+182.6%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%

AMC vs MCS vs CNK vs IMAX vs NFLX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMC logoAMC
MCS logoMCS
CNK logoCNK
IMAX logoIMAX
NFLX logoNFLX
IndustryEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Cap$930M$569M$3.21B$1.92B$374.00B
Revenue (TTM)$5.03B$764M$3.12B$405M$45.18B
Net Income (TTM)$-547M$14M$138M$43M$10.98B
Gross Margin75.3%113.7%40.7%58.1%48.5%
Operating Margin46.5%2.4%11.0%21.4%29.5%
Forward P/E32.2x13.0x21.1x24.8x
Total Debt$8.14B$335M$3.78B$297M$14.46B
Cash & Equiv.$429M$23M$344M$151M$9.03B

AMC vs MCS vs CNK vs IMAX vs NFLXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMC
MCS
CNK
IMAX
NFLX
StockMay 20May 26Return
AMC Entertainment H… (AMC)1003.0-97.0%
The Marcus Corporat… (MCS)100135.5+35.5%
Cinemark Holdings, … (CNK)100182.8+82.8%
IMAX Corporation (IMAX)100282.6+182.6%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMC vs MCS vs CNK vs IMAX vs NFLX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CNK and IMAX are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. IMAX Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. NFLX and MCS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMC
AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AMC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
MCS
The Marcus Corporation
The Income Pick

MCS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.85, yield 1.6%
  • 1.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CNK's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability
CNK
Cinemark Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CNK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.

  • Beta 0.22, yield 1.1%, current ratio 0.71x
  • Lower P/E (13.0x vs 24.8x)
  • Beta 0.22 vs AMC's 1.82
Best for: defensive
IMAX
IMAX Corporation
The Growth Play

IMAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 31.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
  • 16.5% revenue growth vs CNK's 2.1%
  • +38.9% vs AMC's -43.9%
Best for: growth exposure
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NFLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 8.8% 10Y total return vs IMAX's 8.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
  • 24.3% margin vs AMC's -10.9%
  • 19.8% ROA vs AMC's -6.9%, ROIC 29.8% vs 23.7%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIMAX logoIMAX16.5% revenue growth vs CNK's 2.1%
ValueCNK logoCNKLower P/E (13.0x vs 24.8x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs AMC's -10.9%
Stability / SafetyCNK logoCNKBeta 0.22 vs AMC's 1.82
DividendsMCS logoMCS1.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs CNK's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)IMAX logoIMAX+38.9% vs AMC's -43.9%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs AMC's -6.9%, ROIC 29.8% vs 23.7%

AMC vs MCS vs CNK vs IMAX vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMCAMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Admission
49.4%$2.7B
Food and Beverage
31.1%$1.7B
Total Other Product And Service
9.8%$525M
Product and Service, Other
6.9%$373M
Advertising
2.8%$152M
MCSThe Marcus Corporation
FY 2025
Admission
30.7%$220M
Concessions
27.6%$198M
Occupancy
16.0%$115M
Product and Service, Other
14.0%$101M
Food and Beverage
11.8%$84M
CNKCinemark Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Admissions Revenue
49.6%$1.5B
Concessions
39.4%$1.2B
Other Revenues
11.0%$343M
IMAXIMAX Corporation
FY 2025
Image Enhancement And Maintenance Services
54.7%$218M
Technology Sales
24.7%$98M
Technology Rentals
20.6%$82M
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B

AMC vs MCS vs CNK vs IMAX vs NFLX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGIMAX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — AMC and IMAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 111.6x IMAX's $405M. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMC's -10.9%. On growth, AMC holds the edge at +21.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMC logoAMCAMC Entertainment…MCS logoMCSThe Marcus Corpor…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…IMAX logoIMAXIMAX CorporationNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.0B$764M$3.1B$405M$45.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$2.6B$88M$545M$150M$30.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$547M$14M$138M$43M$11.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$124M$37M$177M$115M$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+75.3%+113.7%+40.7%+58.1%+48.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+46.5%+2.4%+11.0%+21.4%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.9%+1.9%+4.4%+10.7%+24.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.5%+4.9%+5.7%+28.5%+20.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+21.2%+3.8%-4.7%-6.1%+17.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+53.2%+3.8%-18.2%+65.5%+31.1%
Evenly matched — AMC and IMAX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 26.4x trailing earnings, CNK trades at a 53% valuation discount to IMAX's 56.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMC's 4.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IMAX's 13.1x.

MetricAMC logoAMCAMC Entertainment…MCS logoMCSThe Marcus Corpor…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…IMAX logoIMAXIMAX CorporationNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$930M$569M$3.2B$1.9B$374.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$8.6B$881M$6.6B$2.1B$379.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-1.24x44.54x26.42x56.56x34.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.32.18x12.97x21.15x24.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple4.67x9.59x12.23x13.10x12.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.19x0.75x1.03x4.69x8.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.25x8.92x4.63x14.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF575.27x18.11x16.18x39.53x
AMC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $2 for MCS. NFLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CNK's 9.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCS scores 7/9 vs AMC's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMC logoAMCAMC Entertainment…MCS logoMCSThe Marcus Corpor…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…IMAX logoIMAXIMAX CorporationNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.4%+25.4%+10.8%+41.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-6.9%+1.4%+3.0%+4.9%+19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+23.7%+2.1%+7.5%+12.7%+29.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+29.0%+2.5%+9.3%+14.5%+30.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937577
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.73x9.14x0.70x0.54x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$7.7B$312M$3.4B$146M$5.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$429M$23M$344M$151M$9.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8.1B$335M$3.8B$297M$14.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.35x6.90x1.89x21.15x17.33x
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $160 for AMC. Over the past 12 months, IMAX leads with a +38.9% total return vs AMC's -43.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs AMC's -70.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMC logoAMCAMC Entertainment…MCS logoMCSThe Marcus Corpor…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…IMAX logoIMAXIMAX CorporationNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-5.6%+20.3%+17.2%-1.1%-3.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-43.9%+10.5%-10.7%+38.9%-23.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.4%+20.9%+71.0%+79.5%+166.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-98.4%-0.8%+29.3%+70.3%+75.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.7%+8.7%-6.6%+8.9%+875.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-70.5%+6.5%+19.6%+21.5%+38.6%
NFLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — MCS and CNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CNK is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMC's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MCS currently trades 91.2% from its 52-week high vs AMC's 37.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMC logoAMCAMC Entertainment…MCS logoMCSThe Marcus Corpor…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…IMAX logoIMAXIMAX CorporationNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.82x0.85x0.22x0.43x0.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$4.08$20.02$34.01$43.16$134.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.93$12.85$21.60$24.20$75.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+37.3%+91.2%+80.8%+82.6%+65.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.048.443.742.435.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded30.1M140K2.1M1.1M44.0M
Evenly matched — MCS and CNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

MCS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AMC as "Hold", MCS as "Buy", CNK as "Buy", IMAX as "Buy", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.8% upside for NFLX (target: $116) vs 15.2% for CNK (target: $32). For income investors, MCS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.60% vs CNK's 1.05%.

MetricAMC logoAMCAMC Entertainment…MCS logoMCSThe Marcus Corpor…CNK logoCNKCinemark Holdings…IMAX logoIMAXIMAX CorporationNFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.00$23.00$31.67$43.00$116.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts288312599
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+1.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0301
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.29$0.29
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+3.3%+8.6%+0.1%+2.4%
MCS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). AMC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMC vs MCS vs CNK vs IMAX vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the stronger pick with 16.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK). Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK) offers the better valuation at 26. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Marcus Corporation (MCS) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX?

On trailing P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is the cheapest at 26. 4x versus IMAX Corporation at 56. 6x. On forward P/E, Cinemark Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -98. 4% for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus AMC's -84. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning AMC is approximately 735% more volatile than CNK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 9% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is pulling ahead at 16.

5% versus 2. 1% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc. (CNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Marcus Corporation grew EPS 270. 8% year-over-year, compared to -49. 5% for Cinemark Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NFLX leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus -13. 0% for AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMC leads at 38. 1% versus 2. 9% for MCS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMC leads at 75. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 32. 2x for The Marcus Corporation — 19. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NFLX: 31. 8% to $116. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX?

In this comparison, MCS (1.

6% yield), CNK (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. AMC, IMAX, NFLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AMC or MCS or CNK or IMAX or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cinemark Holdings, Inc.

(CNK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 1. 1% yield). AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (AMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNK: -6. 6%, AMC: -84. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMC and MCS and CNK and IMAX and NFLX?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. MCS, CNK pay a dividend while AMC, IMAX, NFLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MCS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 68%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CNK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMAX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMC and MCS and CNK and IMAX and NFLX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMC: 21.2% · MCS: 3.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.