Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMCX vs FOX vs WBD vs DIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
AMCX vs FOX vs WBD vs DIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $98M | $13.28B | $67.98B | $192.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.32B | $16.58B | $37.21B | $97.26B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-140M | $1.89B | $-2.15B | $11.22B |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 33.1% | 41.5% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 19.0% | -4.0% | 15.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | 12.2x | 93.5x | 16.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $7.46B | $32.57B | $44.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $5.35B | $4.57B | $5.70B |
AMCX vs FOX vs WBD vs DIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
| Fox Corporation (FOX) | 100 | 196.3 | +96.3% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| The Walt Disney Com… (DIS) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMCX vs FOX vs WBD vs DIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMCX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 16.5x)
FOX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.51, yield 1.1%
- 104.9% 10Y total return vs DIS's 11.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 2.91x
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.1%, current ratio 2.91x
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +216.8% vs DIS's +7.7%
DIS is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth 151.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.5%
- 11.5% margin vs AMCX's -6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.6% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 16.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.5% margin vs AMCX's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs WBD's 0.90, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs DIS's 0.9%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs DIS's +7.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs AMCX's -3.3%, ROIC 16.5% vs 12.1% |
AMCX vs FOX vs WBD vs DIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMCX vs FOX vs WBD vs DIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FOX leads in 2 of 6 categories
AMCX leads 1 • WBD leads 1 • DIS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMCX and FOX and DIS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $97.3B annually — 42.0x AMCX's $2.3B. DIS is the more profitable business, keeping 11.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMCX's -6.0%. On growth, DIS holds the edge at +6.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $16.6B | $37.2B | $97.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $686M | $3.5B | $7.5B | $20.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$140M | $1.9B | -$2.2B | $11.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $267M | $2.5B | $2.3B | $7.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +33.1% | +41.5% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +19.0% | -4.0% | +15.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +11.4% | -5.8% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +15.3% | +6.2% | +7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +2.0% | -1.0% | +6.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.4% | -35.8% | -5.5% | -29.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.5x trailing earnings, FOX trades at a 88% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WBD's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $98M | $13.3B | $68.0B | $192.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $98M | $15.4B | $96.0B | $231.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 11.51x | 93.52x | 15.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.04x | 12.20x | — | 16.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.46x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.08x | 4.26x | 13.73x | 12.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.81x | 1.82x | 2.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.11x | 1.85x | 1.72x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.32x | 4.44x | 22.02x | 19.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FOX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FOX delivers a 17.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AMCX. DIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.39x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBD's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FOX scores 8/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | +17.0% | -5.9% | +9.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +8.8% | -2.2% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | +16.5% | +1.5% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +16.4% | +1.5% | +8.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.60x | 0.88x | 0.39x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $2.1B | $28.0B | $39.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $5.4B | $4.6B | $5.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $7.5B | $32.6B | $44.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | 8.91x | 3.56x | 9.95x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WBD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FOX five years ago would be worth $15,900 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,813 for AMCX. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs DIS's +7.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WBD at 26.3% vs AMCX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.5% | -13.9% | -4.9% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.1% | +20.6% | +216.8% | +7.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | +96.6% | +101.5% | +8.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | +59.0% | -27.8% | -39.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | +104.9% | -3.7% | +11.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.6% | +25.3% | +26.3% | +2.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FOX and WBD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FOX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WBD's 0.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs FOX's 82.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 0.51x | 0.90x | 0.90x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.18 | $68.17 | $30.00 | $124.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.41 | $46.26 | $8.06 | $92.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +82.9% | +90.4% | +87.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 51.1 | 48.9 | 64.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 386K | 1.4M | 22.2M | 9.1M |
Analyst Outlook
FOX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMCX as "Hold", FOX as "Hold", WBD as "Hold", DIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.8% upside for FOX (target: $79) vs -6.5% for AMCX (target: $8). For income investors, FOX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.06% vs DIS's 0.92%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $79.00 | $29.94 | $139.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 42 | 32 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% | — | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.60 | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.5% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
FOX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). AMCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
AMCX vs FOX vs WBD vs DIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Fox Corporation (FOX) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (12. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Walt Disney Company (DIS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS?
On trailing P/E, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the cheapest at 11.
5x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS?
Over the past 5 years, Fox Corporation (FOX) delivered a total return of +59.
0%, compared to -81. 9% for AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FOX returned +104. 9% versus AMCX's -87. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fox Corporation (FOX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. 's 0. 90β — meaning WBD is approximately 75% more volatile than FOX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Walt Disney Company (DIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 39% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fox Corporation (FOX) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Walt Disney Company grew EPS 151. 8% year-over-year, compared to 56. 9% for Fox Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FOX leads at 5. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS?
Fox Corporation (FOX) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
9% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FOX leads at 19. 8% versus 3. 5% for WBD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMCX leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 5x for The Walt Disney Company — 11. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FOX: 39. 8% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS?
In this comparison, FOX (1.
1% yield), DIS (0. 9% yield) pay a dividend. AMCX, WBD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMCX or FOX or WBD or DIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fox Corporation (FOX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 1% yield, +104. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FOX: +104. 9%, AMCX: -87. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMCX and FOX and WBD and DIS?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FOX is a mid-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; DIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. FOX, DIS pay a dividend while AMCX, WBD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.