Entertainment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Broadcasting
Entertainment
Entertainment
AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Broadcasting | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $98M | $317M | $67.98B | $374.00B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.32B | $2.72B | $37.21B | $45.18B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-140M | $156M | $-2.15B | $10.98B |
| Gross Margin | 51.0% | 11.1% | 41.5% | 48.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | -2.6% | -4.0% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 5.0x | — | 93.5x | 24.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $670M | $32.57B | $14.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $452M | $4.57B | $9.03B |
AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX) | 100 | 30.3 | -69.7% |
| fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) | 100 | 7.8 | -92.2% |
| Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD) | 100 | 124.7 | +24.7% |
| Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) | 100 | 210.3 | +110.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMCX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.0x vs 24.8x)
FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
- 67.7% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90
- +216.8% vs FUBO's -65.6%
NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.8% 10Y total return vs WBD's -3.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
- 24.3% margin vs AMCX's -6.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 67.7% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.0x vs 24.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.3% margin vs AMCX's -6.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs FUBO's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +216.8% vs FUBO's -65.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.8% ROA vs AMCX's -3.3%, ROIC 29.8% vs 12.1% |
AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMCX leads 1 • WBD leads 1 • FUBO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 19.5x AMCX's $2.3B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMCX's -6.0%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.3B | $2.7B | $37.2B | $45.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $686M | -$14M | $7.5B | $30.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$140M | $156M | -$2.2B | $11.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $267M | -$81M | $2.3B | $9.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.0% | +11.1% | +41.5% | +48.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | -2.6% | -4.0% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.0% | +5.7% | -5.8% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | -3.0% | +6.2% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +2.5% | -1.0% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.4% | +81.8% | -5.5% | +31.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 63% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WBD's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $98M | $317M | $68.0B | $374.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $98M | $534M | $96.0B | $379.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | -44.88x | 93.52x | 34.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 5.04x | — | — | 24.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 0.08x | — | 13.73x | 12.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 0.12x | 1.82x | 8.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 0.12x | 1.85x | 14.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.32x | — | 22.02x | 39.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AMCX. FUBO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBD's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.2% | +16.2% | -5.9% | +41.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +8.1% | -2.2% | +19.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.1% | -3.3% | +1.5% | +29.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -4.1% | +1.5% | +30.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 0.88x | 0.54x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $0 | $218M | $28.0B | $5.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $452M | $4.6B | $9.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $670M | $32.6B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | 10.35x | 3.56x | 17.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $521 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs FUBO's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -7.5% | -65.3% | -4.9% | -3.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.1% | -65.6% | +216.8% | -23.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | -51.7% | +101.5% | +166.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -81.9% | -94.8% | -27.8% | +75.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.4% | -90.3% | -3.7% | +875.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.6% | -21.6% | +26.3% | +38.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WBD and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUBO's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.86x | 1.77x | 0.90x | 0.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.18 | $56.64 | $30.00 | $134.12 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.41 | $2.48 | $8.06 | $75.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.1% | +19.0% | +90.4% | +65.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 38.0 | 48.9 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 386K | 1.9M | 22.2M | 44.0M |
Analyst Outlook
WBD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMCX as "Hold", FUBO as "Hold", WBD as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs -6.5% for AMCX (target: $8).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $43.00 | $29.94 | $116.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 40 | 14 | 32 | 99 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% |
NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?
On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?
Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FUBO is approximately 354% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.
(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?
Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -2. 6% for FUBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMCX leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.
(AMCX) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.
(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, FUBO: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMCX and FUBO and WBD and NFLX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.