Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMCX
AMC Networks Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$98M
5Y Perf.-69.7%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.

Broadcasting

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.-92.2%
WBD
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$67.98B
5Y Perf.+24.7%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.

Entertainment

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$374.00B
5Y Perf.+110.3%

AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMCX logoAMCX
FUBO logoFUBO
WBD logoWBD
NFLX logoNFLX
IndustryEntertainmentBroadcastingEntertainmentEntertainment
Market Cap$98M$317M$67.98B$374.00B
Revenue (TTM)$2.32B$2.72B$37.21B$45.18B
Net Income (TTM)$-140M$156M$-2.15B$10.98B
Gross Margin51.0%11.1%41.5%48.5%
Operating Margin-3.0%-2.6%-4.0%29.5%
Forward P/E5.0x93.5x24.8x
Total Debt$0.00$670M$32.57B$14.46B
Cash & Equiv.$452M$4.57B$9.03B

AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMCX
FUBO
WBD
NFLX
StockMay 20May 26Return
AMC Networks Inc. (AMCX)10030.3-69.7%
fuboTV Inc. (FUBO)1007.8-92.2%
Warner Bros. Discov… (WBD)100124.7+24.7%
Netflix, Inc. (NFLX)100210.3+110.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NFLX leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. AMC Networks Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. FUBO and WBD also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMCX
AMC Networks Inc.
The Value Play

AMCX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (5.0x vs 24.8x)
Best for: value
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
The Growth Play

FUBO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 67.7%, EPS growth 96.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.2%
  • 67.7% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
Best for: growth exposure
WBD
Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
The Income Pick

WBD is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.90
  • +216.8% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Best for: income & stability
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

NFLX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 8.8% 10Y total return vs WBD's -3.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 54.3%, current ratio 1.19x
  • Beta 0.39, current ratio 1.19x
  • 24.3% margin vs AMCX's -6.0%
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFUBO logoFUBO67.7% revenue growth vs WBD's -5.1%
ValueAMCX logoAMCXLower P/E (5.0x vs 24.8x)
Quality / MarginsNFLX logoNFLX24.3% margin vs AMCX's -6.0%
Stability / SafetyNFLX logoNFLXBeta 0.39 vs FUBO's 1.77
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)WBD logoWBD+216.8% vs FUBO's -65.6%
Efficiency (ROA)NFLX logoNFLX19.8% ROA vs AMCX's -3.3%, ROIC 29.8% vs 12.1%

AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMCXAMC Networks Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
62.9%$1.5B
Advertising
25.1%$581M
License
12.0%$278M
FUBOfuboTV Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription and Circulation
92.4%$1.5B
Advertising
7.1%$115M
Service, Other
0.5%$7M
WBDWarner Bros. Discovery, Inc.
FY 2024
Distribution Revenue
50.1%$19.7B
Content Licensing Contracts
26.2%$10.3B
Advertising
20.6%$8.1B
Service, Other
3.1%$1.2B
NFLXNetflix, Inc.
FY 2024
Streaming
100.0%$39.0B

AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNFLXLAGGINGFUBO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the larger business by revenue, generating $45.2B annually — 19.5x AMCX's $2.3B. NFLX is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMCX's -6.0%. On growth, FUBO holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.WBD logoWBDWarner Bros. Disc…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.3B$2.7B$37.2B$45.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$686M-$14M$7.5B$30.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$140M$156M-$2.2B$11.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$267M-$81M$2.3B$9.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.0%+11.1%+41.5%+48.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.0%-2.6%-4.0%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.0%+5.7%-5.8%+24.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.5%-3.0%+6.2%+20.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-6.3%+2.5%-1.0%+17.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-10.4%+81.8%-5.5%+31.1%
NFLX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 34.9x trailing earnings, NFLX trades at a 63% valuation discount to WBD's 93.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMCX's 0.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WBD's 13.7x.

MetricAMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.WBD logoWBDWarner Bros. Disc…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$98M$317M$68.0B$374.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$98M$534M$96.0B$379.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-44.88x93.52x34.89x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.5.04x24.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.06x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple0.08x13.73x12.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.04x0.12x1.82x8.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.12x1.85x14.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF0.32x22.02x39.53x
AMCX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NFLX delivers a 41.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-12 for AMCX. FUBO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WBD's 0.88x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NFLX scores 7/9 vs AMCX's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.WBD logoWBDWarner Bros. Disc…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-12.2%+16.2%-5.9%+41.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.3%+8.1%-2.2%+19.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+12.1%-3.3%+1.5%+29.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.1%+1.5%+30.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–93467
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.25x0.88x0.54x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$0$218M$28.0B$5.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$452M$4.6B$9.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$670M$32.6B$14.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.95x10.35x3.56x17.33x
NFLX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NFLX five years ago would be worth $17,519 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $521 for FUBO. Over the past 12 months, WBD leads with a +216.8% total return vs FUBO's -65.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NFLX at 38.6% vs FUBO's -21.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.WBD logoWBDWarner Bros. Disc…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-7.5%-65.3%-4.9%-3.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+29.1%-65.6%+216.8%-23.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-44.0%-51.7%+101.5%+166.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-81.9%-94.8%-27.8%+75.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-87.4%-90.3%-3.7%+875.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-17.6%-21.6%+26.3%+38.6%
NFLX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WBD and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NFLX is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FUBO's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WBD currently trades 90.4% from its 52-week high vs FUBO's 19.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.WBD logoWBDWarner Bros. Disc…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.86x1.77x0.90x0.39x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.18$56.64$30.00$134.12
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.41$2.48$8.06$75.01
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+84.1%+19.0%+90.4%+65.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.338.048.935.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded386K1.9M22.2M44.0M
Evenly matched — WBD and NFLX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

WBD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: AMCX as "Hold", FUBO as "Hold", WBD as "Hold", NFLX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 299.3% upside for FUBO (target: $43) vs -6.5% for AMCX (target: $8).

MetricAMCX logoAMCXAMC Networks Inc.FUBO logoFUBOfuboTV Inc.WBD logoWBDWarner Bros. Disc…NFLX logoNFLXNetflix, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.00$43.00$29.94$116.29
# AnalystsCovering analysts40143299
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+2.4%
WBD leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

NFLX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMCX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallNetflix, Inc. (NFLX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMCX vs FUBO vs WBD vs NFLX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is the stronger pick with 67. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (24. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) a "Buy" — based on 99 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?

On trailing P/E, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. at 93. 5x. On forward P/E, AMC Networks Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?

Over the past 5 years, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) delivered a total return of +75. 2%, compared to -94. 8% for fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NFLX returned +875. 3% versus FUBO's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus fuboTV Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning FUBO is approximately 354% more volatile than NFLX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 88% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), fuboTV Inc.

(FUBO) is pulling ahead at 67. 7% versus -5. 1% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (WBD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. grew EPS 106. 3% year-over-year, compared to 27. 6% for Netflix, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FUBO leads at 39. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?

Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 3% net margin versus 1. 9% for Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NFLX leads at 29. 5% versus -2. 6% for FUBO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMCX leads at 51. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, AMC Networks Inc.

(AMCX) trades at 5. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 8x for Netflix, Inc. — 19. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FUBO: 299. 3% to $43. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is AMCX or FUBO or WBD or NFLX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Netflix, Inc.

(NFLX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), +875. 3% 10Y return). fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NFLX: +875. 3%, FUBO: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMCX and FUBO and WBD and NFLX?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMCX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FUBO is a small-cap high-growth stock; WBD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NFLX is a large-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMCX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FUBO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 124%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WBD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 24%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NFLX

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 14%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform AMCX and FUBO and WBD and NFLX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(AMCX: -6.3% · FUBO: 249.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.