Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMD vs INTC vs NVDA vs QCOM vs ARM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AMD vs INTC vs NVDA vs QCOM vs ARM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $579.22B | $543.17B | $4.78T | $196.63B | $220.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.45B | $53.76B | $215.94B | $44.49B | $4.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.01B | $-3.17B | $120.07B | $9.92B | $830M |
| Gross Margin | 50.3% | 35.4% | 71.1% | 54.8% | 95.6% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | -9.4% | 60.4% | 25.5% | 19.4% |
| Forward P/E | 51.9x | 103.7x | 23.7x | 17.4x | 119.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.47B | $46.59B | $11.41B | $16.37B | $356M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5.54B | $14.27B | $10.61B | $7.84B | $2.08B |
AMD vs INTC vs NVDA vs QCOM vs ARM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD) | 100 | 345.5 | +245.5% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 304.3 | +204.3% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 451.7 | +351.7% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 168.0 | +68.0% |
| Arm Holdings plc Am… (ARM) | 100 | 390.2 | +290.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMD vs INTC vs NVDA vs QCOM vs ARM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMD is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 34.3%, EPS growth 165.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
INTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +433.7% vs QCOM's +36.3%
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 224.0% 10Y total return vs AMD's 96.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.25 vs AMD's 10.04
- 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5%
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.55, yield 1.8%
- Beta 1.55, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.82x
- Lower P/E (17.4x vs 119.1x)
- Beta 1.55 vs ARM's 2.42
Among these 5 stocks, ARM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs INTC's -0.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.4x vs 119.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs INTC's -5.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.55 vs ARM's 2.42 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +433.7% vs QCOM's +36.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs INTC's -1.6%, ROIC 81.8% vs -0.0% |
AMD vs INTC vs NVDA vs QCOM vs ARM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMD vs INTC vs NVDA vs QCOM vs ARM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
QCOM leads 2 • AMD leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • ARM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 48.9x ARM's $4.4B. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INTC's -5.9%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37.5B | $53.8B | $215.9B | $44.5B | $4.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.6B | $4.0B | $133.2B | $12.8B | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.0B | -$3.2B | $120.1B | $9.9B | $830M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $8.6B | -$3.1B | $96.7B | $12.5B | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.3% | +35.4% | +71.1% | +54.8% | +95.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | -9.4% | +60.4% | +25.5% | +19.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | -5.9% | +55.6% | +22.3% | +18.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | -5.8% | +44.8% | +28.1% | +25.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +37.8% | +7.2% | +73.2% | -3.5% | +34.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.9% | -2.8% | +97.8% | +173.0% | +120.0% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 37.2x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 87% valuation discount to ARM's 278.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.42x vs AMD's 25.95x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $579.2B | $543.2B | $4.78T | $196.6B | $220.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $578.2B | $575.5B | $4.78T | $205.2B | $219.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 134.06x | -1836.67x | 40.10x | 37.24x | 278.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 51.88x | 103.72x | 23.74x | 17.35x | 119.13x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 25.95x | — | 0.42x | 17.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 86.32x | 49.26x | 35.85x | 14.70x | 216.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.72x | 10.28x | 22.12x | 4.44x | 55.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.23x | 4.16x | 30.52x | 9.72x | 32.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 86.00x | — | 49.40x | 15.34x | 1240.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-3 for INTC. ARM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to QCOM's 0.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.1% | -2.7% | +76.3% | +40.2% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | -1.6% | +58.1% | +18.4% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.7% | -0.0% | +81.8% | +29.1% | +14.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.7% | -0.0% | +97.2% | +28.9% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.37x | 0.07x | 0.77x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.1B | $32.3B | $807M | $8.5B | -$1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.5B | $14.3B | $10.6B | $7.8B | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.5B | $46.6B | $11.4B | $16.4B | $356M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 46.43x | 3.71x | 545.03x | 17.60x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $135,979 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,040 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +433.7% total return vs QCOM's +36.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 90.0% vs QCOM's 21.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.0% | +174.7% | +4.1% | +8.4% | +82.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +253.2% | +433.7% | +72.7% | +36.3% | +71.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +295.4% | +251.1% | +585.5% | +80.8% | +243.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +356.5% | +96.7% | +1259.8% | +50.4% | +243.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9606.6% | +293.1% | +22397.9% | +319.5% | +243.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +58.1% | +52.0% | +90.0% | +21.8% | +50.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMD and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QCOM is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ARM's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMD currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs ARM's 87.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.30x | 2.15x | 1.73x | 1.55x | 2.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $362.79 | $110.48 | $216.80 | $205.95 | $237.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $96.88 | $18.97 | $110.82 | $121.99 | $100.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.9% | +97.9% | +90.6% | +90.6% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.9 | 79.9 | 53.1 | 71.2 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 36.3M | 108.6M | 166.0M | 13.8M | 7.3M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMD as "Buy", INTC as "Hold", NVDA as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", ARM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 41.9% upside for NVDA (target: $279) vs -28.7% for INTC (target: $77). QCOM is the only dividend payer here at 1.85% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $310.86 | $77.18 | $278.83 | $175.00 | $163.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 70 | 84 | 79 | 69 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.0% | +1.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 2 | 23 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.04 | $3.44 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | 0.0% | +0.8% | +4.5% | 0.0% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
AMD vs INTC vs NVDA vs QCOM vs ARM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 37. 2x trailing P/E (17. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) a "Buy" — based on 70 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 37.
2x versus Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares at 278. 5x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 17. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 25x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 10. 04x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1260%, compared to +50.
4% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +224. 0% versus ARM's +243. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
55β versus Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares's 2. 42β — meaning ARM is approximately 56% more volatile than QCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares (ARM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 77% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation (INTC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -0. 5% for Intel Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -0. 0% for INTC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARM leads at 94. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 10. 04x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 17. 4x forward P/E versus 119. 1x for Arm Holdings plc American Depositary Shares — 101. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 41. 9% to $278. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. AMD, INTC, NVDA, ARM do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMD or INTC or NVDA or QCOM or ARM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
8% yield, +319. 5% 10Y return). Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a higher beta of 2. 30 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +319. 5%, AMD: +96. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMD and INTC and NVDA and QCOM and ARM?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ARM is a large-cap high-growth stock. QCOM pays a dividend while AMD, INTC, NVDA, ARM do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.