REIT - Residential
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
AMH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Residential | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $11.77B | $149.25B | $24.68B | $25.85B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.87B | $11.63B | $3.12B | $3.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $467M | $1.43B | $954M | $1.05B |
| Gross Margin | 30.2% | 39.1% | 46.3% | 67.0% |
| Operating Margin | 25.0% | 4.4% | 28.5% | 30.1% |
| Forward P/E | 44.7x | 78.4x | 50.6x | 37.7x |
| Total Debt | $5.13B | $21.38B | $8.78B | $9.33B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $109M | $5.03B | $56M | $187M |
AMH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Homes 4 Re… (AMH) | 100 | 128.4 | +28.4% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 420.4 | +320.4% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 108.8 | +8.8% |
| AvalonBay Communiti… (AVB) | 100 | 119.1 | +19.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 8.0%, EPS growth 9.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.8%
- PEG 1.34 vs EQR's 9.94
- Beta 0.17, yield 3.8%, current ratio 62.90x
- Lower P/E (44.7x vs 50.6x), PEG 1.34 vs 9.94
WELL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 223.1% 10Y total return vs AVB's 31.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs EQR's 4.1%
- Beta 0.13 vs AVB's 0.48, lower leverage
EQR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.38, yield 4.1%
- 4.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs AMH's 3.8%
AVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 34.6% margin vs WELL's 12.3%
- 4.8% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs 0.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs EQR's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (44.7x vs 50.6x), PEG 1.34 vs 9.94 | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.6% margin vs WELL's 12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.13 vs AVB's 0.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs AMH's 3.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.7% vs AMH's -13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs WELL's 2.3%, ROIC 3.3% vs 0.5% |
AMH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EQR leads in 2 of 6 categories
WELL leads 2 • AVB leads 1 • AMH leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 6.2x AMH's $1.9B. AVB is the more profitable business, keeping 34.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WELL's 12.3%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.9B | $11.6B | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $973M | $2.8B | $1.9B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $467M | $1.4B | $954M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $875M | $2.5B | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.2% | +39.1% | +46.3% | +67.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +4.4% | +28.5% | +30.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +12.3% | +30.6% | +34.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +46.9% | +21.9% | +42.7% | +49.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.8% | +40.3% | +2.5% | +3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | +22.5% | -64.2% | -40.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AMH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, EQR trades at a 85% valuation discount to WELL's 153.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMH offers better value at 0.82x vs AVB's 5.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.8B | $149.2B | $24.7B | $25.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16.8B | $165.6B | $33.4B | $35.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 27.47x | 153.25x | 22.63x | 25.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 44.67x | 78.42x | 50.61x | 37.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.82x | — | 4.44x | 5.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.56x | 66.40x | 15.61x | 19.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.31x | 13.99x | 7.96x | 8.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 3.35x | 2.24x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.78x | 52.41x | 19.13x | 18.28x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVB delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $3 for WELL. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVB's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WELL scores 7/9 vs AVB's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.0% | +3.5% | +8.4% | +8.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.5% | +2.3% | +4.6% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +0.5% | +4.2% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.4% | +0.6% | +5.7% | +4.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.66x | 0.49x | 0.77x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.0B | $16.3B | $8.7B | $9.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $109M | $5.0B | $56M | $187M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.1B | $21.4B | $8.8B | $9.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.77x | 0.26x | 5.58x | 5.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $30,234 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,858 for AMH. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +42.7% total return vs AMH's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 42.5% vs AMH's 0.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.6% | +14.3% | +8.4% | +3.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.3% | +42.7% | -2.7% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.5% | +189.5% | +17.5% | +14.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.4% | +202.3% | +6.7% | +12.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +116.9% | +223.1% | +29.3% | +31.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.5% | +42.5% | +5.5% | +4.6% |
Risk & Volatility
WELL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WELL is the less volatile stock with a 0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AVB's 0.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WELL currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs AMH's 83.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.17x | 0.13x | 0.38x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.07 | $219.59 | $71.80 | $209.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $27.21 | $142.65 | $57.58 | $160.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.0% | +97.0% | +91.7% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 72.8 | 60.2 | 69.8 | 71.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 2.6M | 2.4M | 940K |
Analyst Outlook
EQR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMH as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", EQR as "Hold", AVB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 8.0% upside for AMH (target: $35) vs 3.2% for AVB (target: $192). For income investors, EQR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.09% vs WELL's 1.30%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $35.00 | $226.50 | $70.15 | $191.70 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 36 | 34 | 46 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +1.3% | +4.1% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 2 | 8 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.24 | $2.76 | $2.69 | $6.99 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% | +1.1% | +1.9% |
EQR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). WELL leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
AMH vs WELL vs EQR vs AVB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for Equity Residential (EQR). Equity Residential (EQR) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (50. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) a "Buy" — based on 36 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB?
On trailing P/E, Equity Residential (EQR) is the cheapest at 22.
6x versus Welltower Inc. at 153. 3x. On forward P/E, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 37. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Homes 4 Rent wins at 1. 34x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +202. 3%, compared to -1. 4% for American Homes 4 Rent (AMH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WELL returned +223. 1% versus EQR's +29. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus AvalonBay Communities, Inc. 's 0. 48β — meaning AVB is approximately 262% more volatile than WELL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 79% for AvalonBay Communities, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 4. 1% for Equity Residential (EQR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Homes 4 Rent grew EPS 9. 3% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB?
Equity Residential (EQR) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus 8. 8% for Welltower Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQR leads at 36. 3% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVB leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 34x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, AvalonBay Communities, Inc. (AVB) trades at 37. 7x forward P/E versus 78. 4x for Welltower Inc. — 40. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMH: 8. 0% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Equity Residential (EQR) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is AMH or WELL or EQR or AVB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 1. 3% yield, +223. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WELL: +223. 1%, AVB: +31. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMH and WELL and EQR and AVB?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMH is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; AVB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.