Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMLX vs BIIB vs KO vs IONS vs ACAD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - General
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AMLX vs BIIB vs KO vs IONS vs ACAD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $29.53B | $355.61B | $12.11B | $3.61B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $9.86B | $49.28B | $1.06B | $1.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-150M | $1.37B | $13.70B | $-327M | $376M |
| Gross Margin | — | 69.8% | 61.7% | 98.3% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 15.6% | 29.3% | -33.3% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.7x | 25.3x | — | 54.2x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $6.95B | $45.49B | $2.61B | $52M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $3.01B | $10.27B | $372M | $178M |
AMLX vs BIIB vs KO vs IONS vs ACAD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amylyx Pharmaceutic… (AMLX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 135.4 | +35.4% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 93.8 | -6.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMLX vs BIIB vs KO vs IONS vs ACAD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +164.3% vs ACAD's -3.0%
BIIB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.40, current ratio 2.68x
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 54.2x)
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
IONS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 241.3% 10Y total return vs KO's 121.1%
- 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- 34.3% margin vs IONS's -30.9%
- 26.2% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 10.0% vs -132.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 54.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs IONS's -30.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.40 vs AMLX's 1.40 | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 56-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +164.3% vs ACAD's -3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 10.0% vs -132.2% |
AMLX vs BIIB vs KO vs IONS vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMLX vs BIIB vs KO vs IONS vs ACAD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories
IONS leads 2 • BIIB leads 1 • AMLX leads 0 • ACAD leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IONS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO and AMLX operate at a comparable scale, with $49.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IONS's -30.9%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $9.9B | $49.3B | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | $2.4B | $15.5B | $4.5B | $96M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$150M | $1.4B | $13.7B | -$327M | $376M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | $2.6B | $12.6B | -$971M | $212M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +69.8% | +61.7% | +98.3% | +91.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +15.6% | +29.3% | -33.3% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% | +27.8% | -30.9% | +34.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +26.6% | +25.5% | -91.8% | +19.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +1.9% | +12.1% | +87.0% | +9.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +31.1% | +18.2% | +39.8% | -81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 66% valuation discount to KO's 27.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KO's 26.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $29.5B | $355.6B | $12.1B | $3.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $992M | $33.5B | $390.8B | $14.4B | $3.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.54x | 22.66x | 27.18x | -30.79x | 9.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.69x | 25.27x | — | 54.20x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 11.90x | 26.39x | — | 25.09x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.01x | 7.42x | 12.83x | 3.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.52x | 1.61x | 10.40x | 23.97x | 2.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.40x | 67.15x | — | 34.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-59 for IONS. AMLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | +7.5% | +41.1% | -58.6% | +35.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.7% | +4.7% | +13.1% | -10.1% | +26.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -132.2% | +6.5% | +15.8% | -12.8% | +10.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.5% | +7.7% | +17.3% | -14.1% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.38x | 1.33x | 5.35x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$221M | $3.9B | $35.2B | $2.2B | -$126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $3.0B | $10.3B | $372M | $178M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $6.9B | $45.5B | $2.6B | $52M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.91x | 10.70x | -3.64x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,390 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,926 for BIIB. Over the past 12 months, AMLX leads with a +164.3% total return vs ACAD's -3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 20.7% vs AMLX's -16.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +27.8% | +12.5% | +20.3% | -8.0% | -19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +164.3% | +51.2% | +17.2% | +105.7% | -3.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.2% | -36.2% | +47.0% | +76.0% | -14.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -19.3% | -50.7% | +65.6% | +93.9% | -22.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -13.6% | -18.1% | +121.1% | +241.3% | -44.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -16.2% | -13.9% | +13.7% | +20.7% | -5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMLX's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 98.3% from its 52-week high vs ACAD's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 0.40x | -0.20x | 0.42x | 1.10x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.61 | $205.97 | $84.04 | $86.74 | $27.81 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.80 | $121.05 | $65.35 | $34.78 | $19.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.4% | +97.1% | +98.3% | +84.5% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.2 | 57.5 | 60.6 | 46.2 | 47.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.1M | 12.7M | 1.6M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMLX as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", KO as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.5% upside for AMLX (target: $28) vs 4.2% for KO (target: $86). KO is the only dividend payer here at 2.46% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $218.16 | $86.13 | $107.27 | $34.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 48 | 48 | 32 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.5% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 56 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.04 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). IONS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns).
AMLX vs BIIB vs KO vs IONS vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (54. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 2x versus The Coca-Cola Company at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Biogen Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +93. 9%, compared to -50. 7% for Biogen Inc. (BIIB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +241. 3% versus ACAD's -44. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning AMLX is approximately -799% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -40. 4% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus -40. 5% for IONS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 54. 2x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 40. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMLX: 88. 5% to $27. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. AMLX, BIIB, IONS, ACAD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMLX or BIIB or KO or IONS or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +121. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +121. 1%, AMLX: -13. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMLX and BIIB and KO and IONS and ACAD?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMLX (Healthcare) and BIIB (Healthcare) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and IONS (Healthcare) and ACAD (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. KO pays a dividend while AMLX, BIIB, IONS, ACAD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.