Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $12.20B | $29.52B | $2.36B | $63.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.06B | $9.86B | $669M | $14.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-150M | $-327M | $1.37B | $-609M | $4.42B |
| Gross Margin | — | 98.3% | 69.8% | 83.6% | 84.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | -33.3% | 15.6% | -83.9% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 13.7x | — | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $2.61B | $6.95B | $1.28B | $2.71B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $372M | $3.01B | $434M | $3.12B |
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amylyx Pharmaceutic… (AMLX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| Ionis Pharmaceutica… (IONS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
| Biogen Inc. (BIIB) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Ultragenyx Pharmace… (RARE) | 100 | 34.8 | -65.2% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceu… (REGN) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.47
- +156.6% vs RARE's -36.1%
IONS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 21.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- 243.8% 10Y total return vs REGN's 68.0%
- 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
BIIB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 38.1%, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.39, current ratio 2.68x
- Beta 0.39 vs RARE's 1.47
Among these 5 stocks, RARE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
REGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Better valuation composite
- 29.6% margin vs RARE's -91.0%
- 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 11.1% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs -132.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.6% margin vs RARE's -91.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.39 vs RARE's 1.47 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.6% vs RARE's -36.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 8.9% vs -132.2% |
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIIB leads in 2 of 6 categories
REGN leads 1 • IONS leads 1 • AMLX leads 1 • RARE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — IONS and REGN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
REGN and AMLX operate at a comparable scale, with $14.9B and $0 in trailing revenue. REGN is the more profitable business, keeping 29.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RARE's -91.0%. On growth, IONS holds the edge at +87.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.1B | $9.9B | $669M | $14.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | $4.5B | $2.4B | -$536M | $4.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$150M | -$327M | $1.4B | -$609M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | -$971M | $2.6B | -$487M | $4.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +98.3% | +69.8% | +83.6% | +84.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -33.3% | +15.6% | -83.9% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -30.9% | +13.9% | -91.0% | +29.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -91.8% | +26.6% | -72.8% | +27.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +87.0% | +1.9% | -2.4% | +19.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +39.8% | +31.1% | -17.2% | -7.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BIIB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, REGN trades at a 35% valuation discount to BIIB's 22.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BIIB's 11.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than REGN's 15.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $12.2B | $29.5B | $2.4B | $63.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $936M | $14.4B | $33.5B | $3.2B | $63.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.09x | -31.02x | 22.65x | -4.11x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.68x | — | 13.18x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 11.90x | — | 15.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 12.92x | 3.01x | 3.50x | 4.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 24.15x | 1.61x | — | 2.12x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 14.40x | — | 15.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
REGN delivers a 14.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-6 for RARE. AMLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IONS's 5.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIIB scores 5/9 vs IONS's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | -58.6% | +7.5% | -6.1% | +14.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.7% | -10.1% | +4.7% | -45.8% | +11.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -132.2% | -12.8% | +6.5% | -89.4% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.5% | -14.1% | +7.7% | -46.4% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 5.35x | 0.38x | — | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$221M | $2.2B | $3.9B | $842M | -$412M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $372M | $3.0B | $434M | $3.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $2.6B | $6.9B | $1.3B | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -3.64x | 6.91x | -14.49x | 108.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IONS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IONS five years ago would be worth $19,462 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,358 for RARE. Over the past 12 months, AMLX leads with a +156.6% total return vs RARE's -36.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IONS at 21.0% vs RARE's -22.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | -7.3% | +12.5% | +1.6% | -21.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.6% | +104.0% | +50.3% | -36.1% | +18.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | +77.3% | -36.2% | -53.3% | -18.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | +94.6% | -49.6% | -76.4% | +17.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | +243.8% | -18.2% | -60.0% | +68.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.6% | +21.0% | -13.9% | -22.4% | -6.5% |
Risk & Volatility
BIIB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIIB is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RARE's 1.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIIB currently trades 97.1% from its 52-week high vs RARE's 56.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 0.42x | 0.40x | 1.47x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.61 | $86.74 | $205.97 | $42.37 | $821.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.80 | $34.78 | $121.05 | $18.29 | $503.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.8% | +85.1% | +97.1% | +56.6% | +74.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 44.2 | 51.7 | 47.5 | 33.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.6M | 1.1M | 1.5M | 874K |
Analyst Outlook
AMLX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMLX as "Buy", IONS as "Buy", BIIB as "Buy", RARE as "Buy", REGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 101.7% upside for RARE (target: $48) vs 6.2% for BIIB (target: $212). REGN is the only dividend payer here at 0.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $107.27 | $212.26 | $48.36 | $836.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 32 | 48 | 33 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $3.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +6.2% |
BIIB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). REGN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
AMLX vs IONS vs BIIB vs RARE vs REGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (REGN) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN?
On trailing P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Biogen Inc. at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN?
Over the past 5 years, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) delivered a total return of +94. 6%, compared to -76. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. (RARE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IONS returned +241. 3% versus RARE's -59. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Biogen Inc.
(BIIB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning RARE is approximately 263% more volatile than BIIB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 5% for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(IONS) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 65. 5% year-over-year, compared to -21. 1% for Biogen Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RARE leads at 22. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN?
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 4% net margin versus -85. 4% for Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REGN leads at 24. 9% versus -79. 5% for RARE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IONS leads at 98. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) trades at 13. 2x forward P/E versus 13. 7x for Biogen Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RARE: 101. 7% to $48. 36.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN?
In this comparison, REGN (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. AMLX, IONS, BIIB, RARE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMLX or IONS or BIIB or RARE or REGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(REGN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), 0. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (REGN: +68. 2%, RARE: -59. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMLX and IONS and BIIB and RARE and REGN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IONS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BIIB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RARE is a small-cap high-growth stock; REGN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. REGN pays a dividend while AMLX, IONS, BIIB, RARE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.