Biotechnology
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMLX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Banks - Diversified
AMLX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $1.16B | $30.73B | $9.06B | $11.48B | $875.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $16.63B | $4.03B | $8.17B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-150M | $1.39B | $-185M | $489M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | — | 26.1% | 31.9% | 25.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.9% | 11.8% | 11.0% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.2x | 16.9x | 13.9x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $16.17B | $3.07B | $3.56B | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $227M | $1.98B | $214M | $647M | $343.34B |
AMLX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amylyx Pharmaceutic… (AMLX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 74.1 | -25.9% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 56.9 | -43.1% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 55.0 | -45.0% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 215.8 | +115.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMLX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMLX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.47, Low D/E 2.0%, current ratio 14.27x
- +156.6% vs ICLR's +3.0%
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 4.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.2%
- PEG 0.35 vs JPM's 1.08
- 5.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (14.2x vs 16.9x)
CRL is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.42, current ratio 1.29x
Among these 5 stocks, ICLR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
- 454.4% 10Y total return vs IQV's 176.9%
- 20.4% margin vs CRL's -4.6%
- Beta 0.95 vs ICLR's 1.58
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs AMLX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.2x vs 16.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.4% margin vs CRL's -4.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs ICLR's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 1.9% yield; 15-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +156.6% vs ICLR's +3.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs AMLX's -50.7%, ROIC 8.7% vs -132.2% |
AMLX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMLX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories
ICLR leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • AMLX leads 0 • CRL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM and AMLX operate at a comparable scale, with $280.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRL's -4.6%. On growth, IQV holds the edge at +8.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $16.6B | $4.0B | $8.2B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$159M | $3.5B | $824M | $1.5B | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$150M | $1.4B | -$185M | $489M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$121M | $2.7B | $391M | $1.3B | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +26.1% | +31.9% | +25.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +13.9% | +11.8% | +11.0% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +8.3% | -4.6% | +6.0% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +16.1% | +9.7% | +16.4% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.4% | +1.2% | +3.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +15.0% | -160.0% | -38.9% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.6x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 70% valuation discount to ICLR's 51.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.57x vs JPM's 1.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $30.7B | $9.1B | $11.5B | $875.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $936M | $44.9B | $11.9B | $14.4B | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -9.09x | 23.09x | -64.63x | 51.70x | 15.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.16x | 16.90x | 13.86x | 14.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.57x | — | — | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.09x | 13.07x | 10.31x | 18.11x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.88x | 2.26x | 1.39x | 3.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 4.74x | 2.90x | 1.29x | 2.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.98x | 17.47x | 13.32x | 8.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-56 for AMLX. AMLX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 5/9 vs AMLX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -55.7% | +22.1% | -5.7% | +5.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -50.7% | +4.7% | -2.5% | +3.0% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -132.2% | +8.7% | +6.3% | +6.2% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -64.5% | +11.0% | +8.1% | +7.5% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 2.44x | 0.95x | 0.39x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$221M | $14.2B | $2.9B | $2.9B | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $227M | $2.0B | $214M | $647M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $16.2B | $3.1B | $3.6B | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.10x | 4.29x | 3.83x | 0.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,999 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,341 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, AMLX leads with a +156.6% total return vs ICLR's +3.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.6% vs AMLX's -17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.8% | -19.7% | -7.1% | -20.5% | -2.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +156.6% | +14.0% | +24.5% | +3.0% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.0% | -14.6% | -8.5% | -34.2% | +133.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -23.0% | -25.6% | -46.6% | -30.7% | +110.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.4% | +176.9% | +123.0% | +126.5% | +454.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.6% | -5.1% | -2.9% | -13.0% | +32.6% |
Risk & Volatility
JPM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JPM is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 93.0% from its 52-week high vs ICLR's 71.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.16x | 1.39x | 1.59x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.61 | $247.05 | $228.88 | $211.00 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.80 | $153.01 | $143.06 | $66.57 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.8% | +73.3% | +82.2% | +71.1% | +93.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 55.8 | 59.7 | 63.7 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.5M | 769K | 1.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
JPM leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMLX as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 97.7% upside for AMLX (target: $28) vs -3.0% for ICLR (target: $145). JPM is the only dividend payer here at 1.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.50 | $222.22 | $213.17 | $145.36 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 44 | 37 | 30 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% | +4.0% | +6.5% | +3.9% |
JPM leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ICLR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
AMLX vs IQV vs CRL vs ICLR vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (14. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 6x versus ICON Public Limited Company at 51. 7x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 13. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 08x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +110. 0%, compared to -46. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +465. 8% versus AMLX's -13. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 59β — meaning ICLR is approximately 69% more volatile than JPM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus -100. 0% for Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (AMLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 65. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQV leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus -3. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 0. 0% for AMLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 08x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 13. 9x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMLX: 97. 7% to $27. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM?
In this comparison, JPM (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. AMLX, IQV, CRL, ICLR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMLX or IQV or CRL or ICLR or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), 1. 9% yield, +465. 8% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +465. 8%, ICLR: +120. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMLX and IQV and CRL and ICLR and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMLX (Healthcare) and IQV (Healthcare) and CRL (Healthcare) and ICLR (Healthcare) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. JPM pays a dividend while AMLX, IQV, CRL, ICLR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.