AMN vs MMS vs DOCS vs CACI

For growth investors, Doximity, Inc.

(DOCS) is the stronger pick with 20. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN). Maximus, Inc. (MMS) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (7. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Maximus, Inc.

(MMS) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus Doximity, Inc. at 23. 5x. On forward P/E, Maximus, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Doximity, Inc. wins at 0. 21x versus CACI International Inc's 1. 44x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, CACI International Inc (CACI) delivered a total return of +85.

4%, compared to -75. 1% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CACI returned +416. 4% versus DOCS's -50. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CACI International Inc (CACI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

30β versus AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. 's 1. 08β — meaning AMN is approximately 265% more volatile than CACI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 125% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Doximity, Inc.

(DOCS) is pulling ahead at 20. 0% versus -8. 5% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. (AMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Doximity, Inc. grew EPS 54. 2% year-over-year, compared to 10. 4% for Maximus, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DOCS leads at 18. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Doximity, Inc.

(DOCS) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 1% net margin versus -3. 5% for AMN Healthcare Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DOCS leads at 39. 9% versus 1. 2% for AMN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DOCS leads at 90. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Doximity, Inc. (DOCS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 21x versus CACI International Inc's 1. 44x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Maximus, Inc. (MMS) trades at 7. 8x forward P/E versus 17. 4x for CACI International Inc — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMS: 65. 0% to $110. 00.

In this comparison, MMS (1.

8% yield) pays a dividend. AMN, DOCS, CACI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, CACI International Inc (CACI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

30), +416. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CACI: +416. 4%, AMN: -41. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (AMN (Healthcare) and MMS (Industrials) and DOCS (Healthcare) and CACI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMS is a small-cap deep-value stock; DOCS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CACI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MMS pays a dividend while AMN, DOCS, CACI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.