Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMOD vs CDLX vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Advertising Agencies
Internet Content & Information
Advertising Agencies
Software - Application
AMOD vs CDLX vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Advertising Agencies | Internet Content & Information | Advertising Agencies | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $1M | $43M | $483M | $2.01B | $1.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $206M | $440M | $723M | $764M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-95M | $-8M | $159M | $55M |
| Gross Margin | — | 38.9% | 33.3% | 63.4% | 82.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -22.8% | -3.4% | 14.8% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | — | 8.9x | 13.4x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $215M | $42M | $279M | $100M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $736K | $49M | $91M | $553M | $259M |
AMOD vs CDLX vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD) | 100 | 7.7 | -92.3% |
| Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) | 100 | 21.1 | -78.9% |
| Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 87.9 | -12.1% |
| DoubleVerify Holdin… (DV) | 100 | 56.5 | -43.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMOD vs CDLX vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 20.5x)
Among these 5 stocks, CDLX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PERI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
- 139.6% 10Y total return vs MGNI's -4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
- Beta 0.94, current ratio 2.76x
MGNI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 22.0% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
- 5.3% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2%
DV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.3%
- 13.9% revenue growth vs AMOD's -8.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% revenue growth vs AMOD's -8.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.0% margin vs CDLX's -46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.94 vs CDLX's 3.18 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.9% vs AMOD's -82.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.3% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2% |
AMOD vs CDLX vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMOD vs CDLX vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PERI leads in 3 of 6 categories
DV leads 1 • MGNI leads 1 • AMOD leads 0 • CDLX leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DV leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DV and AMOD operate at a comparable scale, with $764M and $0 in trailing revenue. MGNI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDLX's -46.0%. On growth, DV holds the edge at +9.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $206M | $440M | $723M | $764M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | -$23M | $3M | $145M | $148M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$95M | -$8M | $159M | $55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $6M | $39M | $44M | $135M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +38.9% | +33.3% | +63.4% | +82.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -22.8% | -3.4% | +14.8% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -46.0% | -1.8% | +22.0% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +2.9% | +8.9% | +6.1% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -44.6% | +5.8% | +5.5% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -176.2% | +3.8% | +72.7% | +142.9% | +3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PERI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMOD trades at a 99% valuation discount to DV's 36.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMOD's 1.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 106.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $43M | $483M | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $210M | $434M | $1.7B | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.32x | -0.40x | -56.74x | 14.74x | 36.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 8.89x | 13.45x | 20.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.30x | — | 106.04x | 11.43x | 11.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.18x | 1.10x | 2.81x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 0.67x | 2.33x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 4.89x | 12.66x | 12.11x | 10.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-9 for CDLX. PERI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGNI's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDLX scores 6/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -8.7% | -1.2% | +18.6% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.2% | -31.5% | -0.9% | +5.3% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -18.3% | -1.7% | +9.5% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -20.9% | -1.8% | +7.3% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.06x | 0.30x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $167M | -$49M | -$275M | -$159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $735,814 | $49M | $91M | $553M | $259M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $215M | $42M | $279M | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.09x | -14.37x | — | 4.03x | 43.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PERI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PERI five years ago would be worth $6,282 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for CDLX. Over the past 12 months, PERI leads with a +16.9% total return vs AMOD's -82.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs AMOD's -71.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -50.2% | -30.2% | +15.3% | -12.8% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -82.3% | -63.8% | +16.9% | +12.6% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -86.5% | -68.0% | +58.7% | -60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -99.2% | -37.2% | -60.9% | -70.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | -94.2% | +139.6% | -4.7% | -68.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -71.9% | -48.8% | -31.6% | +16.7% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
PERI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PERI is the less volatile stock with a 0.94 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDLX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PERI currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs AMOD's 8.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.51x | 3.18x | 0.94x | 1.63x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.60 | $3.28 | $11.79 | $26.65 | $16.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.20 | $0.66 | $8.07 | $10.82 | $7.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +8.8% | +23.8% | +91.4% | +52.5% | +64.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 26.0 | 36.6 | 59.1 | 55.4 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.2M | 321K | 2.1M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PERI as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", DV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.2% upside for DV (target: $15) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $14.00 | $18.00 | $15.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 13 | 31 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +14.7% | +2.3% | +8.1% |
PERI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). DV leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
AMOD vs CDLX vs PERI vs MGNI vs DV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV?
On trailing P/E, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
(AMOD) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. at 36. 2x. On forward P/E, Perion Network Ltd. is actually cheaper at 8. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV?
Over the past 5 years, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) delivered a total return of -37. 2%, compared to -99. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PERI returned +139. 6% versus AMOD's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 94β versus Cardlytics, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning CDLX is approximately 238% more volatile than PERI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 30% for Magnite, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 20. 3% year-over-year, compared to -176. 0% for Perion Network Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DV leads at 18. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV?
Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -44. 4% for Cardlytics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGNI leads at 13. 7% versus -20. 2% for CDLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DV leads at 82. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) trades at 8. 9x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. — 11. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DV: 39. 2% to $15. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is AMOD or CDLX or PERI or MGNI or DV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perion Network Ltd.
(PERI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 94), +139. 6% 10Y return). Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PERI: +139. 6%, CDLX: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMOD and CDLX and PERI and MGNI and DV?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMOD (Technology) and CDLX (Communication Services) and PERI (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services) and DV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMOD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CDLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; DV is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 20%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.