Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMOD vs PERI vs MGNI vs CDLX vs TPVG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMOD
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-92.3%
PERI
Perion Network Ltd.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$483M
5Y Perf.+27.3%
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.01B
5Y Perf.-12.1%
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.

Advertising Agencies

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$43M
5Y Perf.-78.9%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$243M
5Y Perf.-18.8%

AMOD vs PERI vs MGNI vs CDLX vs TPVG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMOD logoAMOD
PERI logoPERI
MGNI logoMGNI
CDLX logoCDLX
TPVG logoTPVG
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationInternet Content & InformationAdvertising AgenciesAdvertising AgenciesAsset Management
Market Cap$1M$483M$2.01B$43M$243M
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$440M$723M$206M$97M
Net Income (TTM)$-7M$-8M$159M$-95M$-12M
Gross Margin33.3%63.4%38.9%83.5%
Operating Margin-3.4%14.8%-22.8%77.9%
Forward P/E0.3x8.9x13.4x6.5x
Total Debt$5M$42M$279M$215M$469M
Cash & Equiv.$736K$91M$553M$49M$20M

AMOD vs PERI vs MGNI vs CDLX vs TPVGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMOD
PERI
MGNI
CDLX
TPVG
StockDec 24May 26Return
Alpha Modus Holding… (AMOD)1007.7-92.3%
Perion Network Ltd. (PERI)100127.3+27.3%
Magnite, Inc. (MGNI)10087.9-12.1%
Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX)10021.1-78.9%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10081.2-18.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMOD vs PERI vs MGNI vs CDLX vs TPVG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TPVG leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency. MGNI also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
AMOD
Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.
The Value Play

AMOD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.

  • Lower P/E (0.3x vs 6.5x)
Best for: value
PERI
Perion Network Ltd.
The Income Pick

PERI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.94
  • 139.6% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 93.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.94, Low D/E 6.3%, current ratio 2.76x
  • Beta 0.94, current ratio 2.76x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
MGNI
Magnite, Inc.
The Growth Play

MGNI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 493.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
  • 5.3% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2%
Best for: growth exposure
CDLX
Cardlytics, Inc.
The Communication Services Pick

Among these 5 stocks, CDLX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.

  • 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMOD's -8.4%
  • 50.6% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
  • Beta 0.83 vs CDLX's 3.18
  • 17.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTPVG logoTPVG36.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMOD's -8.4%
ValueAMOD logoAMODLower P/E (0.3x vs 6.5x)
Quality / MarginsTPVG logoTPVG50.6% margin vs CDLX's -46.0%
Stability / SafetyTPVG logoTPVGBeta 0.83 vs CDLX's 3.18
DividendsTPVG logoTPVG17.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TPVG logoTPVG+19.3% vs AMOD's -82.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MGNI logoMGNI5.3% ROA vs AMOD's -18.2%

AMOD vs PERI vs MGNI vs CDLX vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMODAlpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

PERIPerion Network Ltd.
FY 2024
Display and Social Advertising
67.3%$336M
Search Advertising and other
32.7%$163M
MGNIMagnite, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CDLXCardlytics, Inc.
FY 2025
Cost per Redemption
50.9%$129M
Cost per Served Sales
31.1%$79M
Bridg Subscription Revenue
8.2%$21M
Bridg Total Revenue
8.2%$21M
Cost Other
1.6%$4M
TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

AMOD vs PERI vs MGNI vs CDLX vs TPVG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMGNILAGGINGCDLX

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MGNI and AMOD operate at a comparable scale, with $723M and $0 in trailing revenue. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CDLX's -46.0%. On growth, PERI holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricAMOD logoAMODAlpha Modus Holdi…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$440M$723M$206M$97M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$4M$3M$145M-$23M-$22M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$7M-$8M$159M-$95M-$12M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2M$39M$44M$6M$35M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+33.3%+63.4%+38.9%+83.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-3.4%+14.8%-22.8%+77.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-1.8%+22.0%-46.0%+50.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.9%+6.1%+2.9%-58.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.8%+5.5%-44.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-176.2%+72.7%+142.9%+3.8%-2.3%
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PERI and CDLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMOD trades at a 98% valuation discount to MGNI's 14.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMOD's 1.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PERI's 106.0x.

MetricAMOD logoAMODAlpha Modus Holdi…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Market CapShares × price$1M$483M$2.0B$43M$243M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6M$434M$1.7B$210M$691M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.32x-56.74x14.74x-0.40x4.91x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.89x13.45x6.50x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.84x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.30x106.04x11.43x9.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.10x2.81x0.18x2.50x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.67x2.33x0.68x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.66x12.11x4.89x
Evenly matched — PERI and CDLX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGNI delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-9 for CDLX. PERI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TPVG's 1.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MGNI scores 6/9 vs PERI's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricAMOD logoAMODAlpha Modus Holdi…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-1.2%+18.6%-8.7%-3.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-18.2%-0.9%+5.3%-31.5%-1.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.7%+9.5%-18.3%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.8%+7.3%-20.9%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–953665
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.06x0.30x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4M-$49M-$275M$167M$449M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$735,814$91M$553M$49M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$42M$279M$215M$469M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.09x4.03x-14.37x-1.02x
MGNI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — PERI and MGNI and TPVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for CDLX. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs AMOD's -82.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MGNI at 16.7% vs AMOD's -71.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMOD logoAMODAlpha Modus Holdi…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-50.2%+15.3%-12.8%-30.2%-6.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-82.3%+16.9%+12.6%-63.8%+19.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.8%-68.0%+58.7%-86.5%-3.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.8%-37.2%-60.9%-99.2%-13.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.8%+139.6%-4.7%-94.2%+93.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-71.9%-31.6%+16.7%-48.8%-1.2%
Evenly matched — PERI and MGNI and TPVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — PERI and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDLX's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PERI currently trades 91.4% from its 52-week high vs AMOD's 8.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMOD logoAMODAlpha Modus Holdi…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.51x0.94x1.63x3.18x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$2.60$11.79$26.65$3.28$7.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.20$8.07$10.82$0.66$4.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.8%+91.4%+52.5%+23.8%+79.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10026.059.155.436.658.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.3M321K2.1M1.2M504K
Evenly matched — PERI and TPVG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: PERI as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 28.6% for MGNI (target: $18). TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricAMOD logoAMODAlpha Modus Holdi…PERI logoPERIPerion Network Lt…MGNI logoMGNIMagnite, Inc.CDLX logoCDLXCardlytics, Inc.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$18.00$8.95
# AnalystsCovering analysts133112
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+17.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+14.7%+2.3%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

TPVG leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). MGNI leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.

Best OverallMagnite, Inc. (MGNI)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMOD vs PERI vs MGNI vs CDLX vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. (AMOD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG?

On trailing P/E, Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc.

(AMOD) is the cheapest at 0. 3x versus Magnite, Inc. at 14. 7x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG?

Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) delivered a total return of -13. 5%, compared to -99. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PERI returned +139. 6% versus AMOD's -97. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus Cardlytics, Inc. 's 3. 18β — meaning CDLX is approximately 283% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perion Network Ltd. (PERI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 133% for TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -16. 2% for Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alpha Modus Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 20. 3% year-over-year, compared to -176. 0% for Perion Network Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MGNI leads at 7. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -44. 4% for Cardlytics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -20. 2% for CDLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 4x for Magnite, Inc. — 7. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49. 4% to $8. 95.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG?

In this comparison, TPVG (17.

1% yield) pays a dividend. AMOD, PERI, MGNI, CDLX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is AMOD or PERI or MGNI or CDLX or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 17. 1% yield). Cardlytics, Inc. (CDLX) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +93. 3%, CDLX: -94. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMOD and PERI and MGNI and CDLX and TPVG?

These companies operate in different sectors (AMOD (Technology) and PERI (Communication Services) and MGNI (Communication Services) and CDLX (Communication Services) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: AMOD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PERI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock; CDLX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. TPVG pays a dividend while AMOD, PERI, MGNI, CDLX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

AMOD

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PERI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGNI

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CDLX

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 23%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.