Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMPG vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs AVGO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
AMPG vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs AVGO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $45M | $5.23T | $627.10B | $230.92B | $2.04T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $215.94B | $53.76B | $44.49B | $68.28B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $120.07B | $-3.17B | $9.92B | $24.97B |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 71.1% | 35.4% | 54.8% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -37.1% | 60.4% | -9.4% | 25.5% | 40.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 26.0x | 116.5x | 20.4x | 38.0x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $11.41B | $46.59B | $16.37B | $65.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $10.61B | $14.27B | $7.84B | $16.18B |
AMPG vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs AVGO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AmpliTech Group, In… (AMPG) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 1656.8 | +1556.8% |
| Intel Corporation (INTC) | 100 | 225.0 | +125.0% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 140.2 | +40.2% |
| Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) | 100 | 954.5 | +854.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMPG vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs AVGO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMPG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 243.2% 10Y total return vs AVGO's 30.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.74, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
- PEG 0.27 vs QCOM's 9.80
INTC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +494.7% vs AMPG's +22.9%
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.64, yield 1.6%
- Beta 1.64, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.82x
- Lower P/E (20.4x vs 38.0x)
- Beta 1.64 vs AMPG's 2.87
Among these 5 stocks, AVGO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs AMPG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.4x vs 38.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs AMPG's -33.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.64 vs AMPG's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +494.7% vs AMPG's +22.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs AMPG's -16.1%, ROIC 81.8% vs -27.1% |
AMPG vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs AVGO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
AMPG vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs AVGO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
QCOM leads 2 • AMPG leads 0 • INTC leads 0 • AVGO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 9566.7x AMPG's $23M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMPG's -33.8%. On growth, AMPG holds the edge at +115.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $215.9B | $53.8B | $44.5B | $68.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $133.2B | $4.0B | $12.8B | $38.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | $120.1B | -$3.2B | $9.9B | $25.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $96.7B | -$3.1B | $12.5B | $28.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +71.1% | +35.4% | +54.8% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.1% | +60.4% | -9.4% | +25.5% | +40.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.8% | +55.6% | -5.9% | +22.3% | +36.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | +44.8% | -5.8% | +28.1% | +42.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.0% | +73.2% | +7.2% | -3.5% | +29.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | +97.8% | -2.8% | +173.0% | +31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
QCOM leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.7x trailing earnings, QCOM trades at a 51% valuation discount to AVGO's 90.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.46x vs QCOM's 21.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $5.23T | $627.1B | $230.9B | $2.04T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $5.23T | $659.4B | $239.5B | $2.09T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.04x | 43.92x | -2120.46x | 43.73x | 90.15x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.00x | 116.47x | 20.37x | 37.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.46x | — | 21.03x | 1.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 39.27x | 56.44x | 17.16x | 60.94x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.77x | 24.22x | 11.87x | 5.21x | 31.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 33.43x | 4.80x | 11.42x | 25.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 54.10x | — | 18.01x | 75.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-21 for AMPG. NVDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVGO's 0.80x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVGO scores 8/9 vs AMPG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.3% | +76.3% | -2.7% | +40.2% | +32.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.1% | +58.1% | -1.6% | +18.4% | +14.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +81.8% | -0.0% | +29.1% | +14.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | +97.2% | -0.0% | +28.9% | +16.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 0.07x | 0.37x | 0.77x | 0.80x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $807M | $32.3B | $8.5B | $49.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $10.6B | $14.3B | $7.8B | $16.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $11.4B | $46.6B | $16.4B | $65.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.85x | 545.03x | 3.71x | 17.60x | 9.24x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $150,908 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,104 for AMPG. Over the past 12 months, INTC leads with a +494.7% total return vs AMPG's +22.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 94.7% vs AMPG's -10.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.9% | +14.0% | +217.2% | +27.2% | +23.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +83.4% | +494.7% | +53.4% | +108.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | +638.6% | +307.9% | +111.7% | +594.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | +1409.1% | +129.0% | +82.3% | +908.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +24324.1% | +350.5% | +382.4% | +3019.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | +94.7% | +59.8% | +28.4% | +90.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVDA and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
QCOM is the less volatile stock with a 1.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMPG's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs AMPG's 45.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.87x | 1.74x | 2.27x | 1.64x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.89 | $217.80 | $130.57 | $228.04 | $437.68 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.64 | $115.21 | $18.97 | $121.99 | $203.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.0% | +98.8% | +95.7% | +96.1% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 63.4 | 80.5 | 82.6 | 60.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 496K | 160.0M | 113.6M | 15.6M | 23.1M |
Analyst Outlook
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVDA as "Buy", INTC as "Hold", QCOM as "Hold", AVGO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 28.1% upside for NVDA (target: $276) vs -36.3% for INTC (target: $80). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.57% vs AVGO's 0.53%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $275.74 | $79.55 | $185.56 | $443.72 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 | 84 | 69 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | +1.6% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 0 | 23 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | $3.44 | $2.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +3.8% | +0.3% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). QCOM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
AMPG vs NVDA vs INTC vs QCOM vs AVGO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) offers the better valuation at 43. 7x trailing P/E (20. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO?
On trailing P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the cheapest at 43.
7x versus Broadcom Inc. at 90. 1x. On forward P/E, QUALCOMM Incorporated is actually cheaper at 20. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO?
Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1409%, compared to -49.
0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +243. 2% versus AMPG's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
64β versus AmpliTech Group, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning AMPG is approximately 76% more volatile than QCOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 80% for Broadcom Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus -39. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadcom Inc. grew EPS 287. 8% year-over-year, compared to -315. 4% for AmpliTech Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus -118. 2% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus -88. 7% for AMPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) trades at 20. 4x forward P/E versus 116. 5x for Intel Corporation — 96. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 28. 1% to $275. 74.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO?
In this comparison, QCOM (1.
6% yield), AVGO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. AMPG, NVDA, INTC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMPG or NVDA or INTC or QCOM or AVGO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.
6% yield, +382. 4% 10Y return). AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (QCOM: +382. 4%, AMPG: -75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMPG and NVDA and INTC and QCOM and AVGO?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; INTC is a large-cap quality compounder stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; AVGO is a mega-cap high-growth stock. QCOM, AVGO pay a dividend while AMPG, NVDA, INTC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.