Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL vs GILT vs SWKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Communication Equipment
Semiconductors
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL vs GILT vs SWKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Telecommunications Services | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $45M | $1.18B | $165M | $1.42B | $10.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23M | $41.45B | $80M | $452M | $4.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-1.50B | $270K | $21M | $361M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 34.2% | 32.0% | 29.5% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | -37.1% | 5.2% | 3.4% | 3.6% | 9.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 26.3x | 38.8x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $39.51B | $27M | $11M | $1.20B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $5.00B | $5M | $169M | $1.16B |
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL vs GILT vs SWKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AmpliTech Group, In… (AMPG) | 100 | 16.7 | -83.3% |
| Sify Technologies L… (SIFY) | 100 | 129.7 | +29.7% |
| RF Industries, Ltd. (RFIL) | 100 | 260.3 | +160.3% |
| Gilat Satellite Net… (GILT) | 100 | 169.8 | +69.8% |
| Skyworks Solutions,… (SWKS) | 100 | 39.5 | -60.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL vs GILT vs SWKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMPG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, SIFY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RFIL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs GILT's 371.3%
- +284.9% vs SWKS's +3.4%
GILT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 47.9%, EPS growth -22.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 23.5%
- 47.9% revenue growth vs AMPG's -39.0%
SWKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.30, yield 4.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 20.9%, current ratio 2.33x
- Beta 1.30, yield 4.2%, current ratio 2.33x
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 38.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 47.9% revenue growth vs AMPG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 38.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.9% margin vs AMPG's -33.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs AMPG's 2.87 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +284.9% vs SWKS's +3.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs AMPG's -16.1%, ROIC 6.3% vs -27.1% |
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL vs GILT vs SWKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL vs GILT vs SWKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWKS leads in 4 of 6 categories
RFIL leads 1 • AMPG leads 0 • SIFY leads 0 • GILT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SWKS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SIFY is the larger business by revenue, generating $41.4B annually — 1836.2x AMPG's $23M. SWKS is the more profitable business, keeping 8.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMPG's -33.8%. On growth, AMPG holds the edge at +115.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23M | $41.4B | $80M | $452M | $4.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | $8.1B | $5M | $40M | $842M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$1.5B | $270,000 | $21M | $361M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $0 | $4M | $10M | $697M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +23.1% | +34.2% | +32.0% | +29.5% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -37.1% | +5.2% | +3.4% | +3.6% | +9.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -33.8% | -3.6% | +0.3% | +4.6% | +8.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.9% | -9.2% | +5.5% | +2.2% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.0% | +2.5% | -1.2% | +75.3% | -1.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +91.7% | -3.7% | +100.0% | -38.1% | -44.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SWKS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.7x trailing earnings, SWKS trades at a 99% valuation discount to RFIL's 2182.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SWKS's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RFIL's 35.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $45M | $1.2B | $165M | $1.4B | $10.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $1.5B | $187M | $1.3B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.04x | -122.55x | 2182.86x | 57.03x | 21.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 26.34x | 38.78x | 13.39x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.53x | 35.39x | 28.73x | 10.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.77x | 2.80x | 2.05x | 3.14x | 2.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.61x | 4.77x | 4.67x | 2.34x | 1.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 38.04x | 154.44x | 9.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SWKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SWKS delivers a 6.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-21 for AMPG. GILT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIFY's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RFIL scores 8/9 vs GILT's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -21.3% | -7.7% | +0.8% | +4.1% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -16.1% | -1.8% | +0.4% | +2.8% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +3.3% | +3.6% | +5.7% | +6.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -23.5% | +4.4% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.12x | 1.96x | 0.76x | 0.02x | 0.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$15M | $34.5B | $22M | -$158M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $5.0B | $5M | $169M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $39.5B | $27M | $11M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -36.85x | 0.82x | — | 5.18x | 14.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RFIL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RFIL five years ago would be worth $23,875 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,800 for SWKS. Over the past 12 months, RFIL leads with a +284.9% total return vs SWKS's +3.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RFIL at 56.6% vs SWKS's -10.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.9% | +33.0% | +169.0% | +44.6% | +4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.9% | +273.9% | +284.9% | +197.4% | +3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.6% | +119.6% | +283.9% | +257.1% | -28.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | -9.2% | +138.7% | +116.6% | -52.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.0% | +147.9% | +561.0% | +371.3% | +33.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.6% | +30.0% | +56.6% | +52.8% | -10.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RFIL and SWKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SWKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMPG's 2.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RFIL currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs AMPG's 45.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.87x | 1.35x | 2.11x | 2.12x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.89 | $17.85 | $15.80 | $20.56 | $90.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.64 | $4.15 | $3.82 | $5.43 | $51.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.0% | +91.5% | +96.7% | +94.3% | +73.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.5 | 61.2 | 61.0 | 55.4 | 56.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 496K | 57K | 247K | 656K | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
SWKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIFY as "Buy", RFIL as "Buy", GILT as "Buy", SWKS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.3% upside for SWKS (target: $72) vs -63.9% for GILT (target: $7). SWKS is the only dividend payer here at 4.18% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $7.00 | $72.30 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.36 | — | — | $2.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
SWKS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). RFIL leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
AMPG vs SIFY vs RFIL vs GILT vs SWKS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is the stronger pick with 47. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS) offers the better valuation at 21. 7x trailing P/E (13. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS?
On trailing P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the cheapest at 21. 7x versus RF Industries, Ltd. at 2182. 9x. On forward P/E, Skyworks Solutions, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS?
Over the past 5 years, RF Industries, Ltd.
(RFIL) delivered a total return of +138. 7%, compared to -52. 0% for Skyworks Solutions, Inc. (SWKS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RFIL returned +561. 0% versus AMPG's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus AmpliTech Group, Inc. 's 2. 87β — meaning AMPG is approximately 120% more volatile than SWKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. (GILT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 196% for Sify Technologies Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd.
(GILT) is pulling ahead at 47. 9% versus -39. 0% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RF Industries, Ltd. grew EPS 101. 1% year-over-year, compared to -877. 8% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, GILT leads at 23. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS?
Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -118. 2% for AmpliTech Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SWKS leads at 12. 2% versus -88. 7% for AMPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SWKS leads at 41. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 38. 8x for Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd. — 25. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SWKS: 8. 3% to $72. 30.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS?
In this comparison, SWKS (4.
2% yield) pays a dividend. AMPG, SIFY, RFIL, GILT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is AMPG or SIFY or RFIL or GILT or SWKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Skyworks Solutions, Inc.
(SWKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (4. 2% yield). AmpliTech Group, Inc. (AMPG) carries a higher beta of 2. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SWKS: +33. 9%, AMPG: -75. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMPG and SIFY and RFIL and GILT and SWKS?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMPG (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services) and RFIL (Industrials) and GILT (Technology) and SWKS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: AMPG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RFIL is a small-cap high-growth stock; GILT is a small-cap high-growth stock; SWKS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SWKS pays a dividend while AMPG, SIFY, RFIL, GILT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.