Medical - Care Facilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMS vs IART
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
AMS vs IART — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Care Facilities | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $13M | $1.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29M | $1.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-496M |
| Gross Margin | 25.0% | 39.6% |
| Operating Margin | -12.3% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 6.1x | 5.8x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $2.03B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11M | $235M |
AMS vs IART — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Shared Hos… (AMS) | 100 | 109.2 | +9.2% |
| Integra LifeScience… (IART) | 100 | 26.0 | -74.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMS vs IART
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta -0.02
- Rev growth 32.9%, EPS growth 245.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.1%
- -4.7% 10Y total return vs IART's -63.0%
IART is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 2.34, current ratio 2.54x
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 6.1x)
- +6.5% vs AMS's -27.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.9% revenue growth vs IART's 1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 6.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.6% margin vs IART's -30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (77.4% vs 194.8%) | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.5% vs AMS's -27.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -3.8% ROA vs IART's -13.7%, ROIC -5.8% vs 1.7% |
AMS vs IART — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMS vs IART — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IART leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IART is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 55.9x AMS's $29M. AMS is the more profitable business, keeping -7.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IART's -30.1%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $209M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$496M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.0% | +39.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.3% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | -30.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.7% | -0.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.5% | +2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -56.7% | +81.8% |
Valuation Metrics
AMS leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMS's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IART's 13.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $13M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $2.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.09x | -2.01x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.93x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.51x | 13.01x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.46x | 0.65x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.45x | 1.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMS delivers a -7.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-8 in annual profit, vs $-48 for IART. AMS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.77x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IART's 1.95x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -7.9% | -47.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.8% | -13.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.8% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.4% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.77x | 1.95x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11M | $235M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.35x | -10.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMS five years ago would be worth $5,894 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,827 for IART. Over the past 12 months, IART leads with a +6.5% total return vs AMS's -27.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMS at -10.4% vs IART's -35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.3% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -27.4% | +6.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.0% | -73.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.1% | -81.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.7% | -63.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.4% | -35.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMS and IART each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMS is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IART's 2.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IART currently trades 82.2% from its 52-week high vs AMS's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 2.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.11 | $16.49 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.25 | $8.70 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +82.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 75.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 138K | 858K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
AMS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). IART leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
AMS vs IART: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMS or IART a better buy right now?
For growth investors, American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is the stronger pick with 32.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 5% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART). American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — AMS or IART?
Over the past 5 years, American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) delivered a total return of -41.
1%, compared to -81. 7% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMS returned -4. 7% versus IART's -63. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — AMS or IART?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
02β versus Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation's 2. 34β — meaning IART is approximately -14990% more volatile than AMS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 195% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — AMS or IART?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is pulling ahead at 32.
9% versus 1. 5% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: American Shared Hospital Services grew EPS 245. 9% year-over-year, compared to -73. 6% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMS leads at 17. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — AMS or IART?
American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
7% net margin versus -31. 6% for Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IART leads at 4. 2% versus -9. 9% for AMS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IART leads at 51. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — AMS or IART?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is AMS or IART better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Shared Hospital Services (AMS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
02)). Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (IART) carries a higher beta of 2. 34 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMS: -4. 7%, IART: -63. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between AMS and IART?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMS is a small-cap high-growth stock; IART is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.