REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
AMT vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Healthcare Facilities
AMT vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Healthcare Facilities | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Healthcare Facilities |
| Market Cap | $82.98B | $150.14B | $130.26B | $41.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.82B | $11.63B | $8.74B | $6.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.88B | $1.43B | $3.21B | $260M |
| Gross Margin | 73.4% | 39.1% | 67.7% | -4.3% |
| Operating Margin | 44.2% | 4.4% | 47.0% | 13.4% |
| Forward P/E | 27.2x | 78.9x | 40.8x | 118.3x |
| Total Debt | $44.96B | $21.38B | $31.49B | $13.22B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.47B | $5.03B | $1.32B | $741M |
AMT vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Tower Corp… (AMT) | 100 | 69.0 | -31.0% |
| Welltower Inc. (WELL) | 100 | 422.9 | +322.9% |
| Prologis, Inc. (PLD) | 100 | 153.3 | +53.3% |
| Ventas, Inc. (VTR) | 100 | 248.3 | +148.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMT vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta -0.04, yield 3.8%
- PEG 3.72 vs PLD's 3.77
- Lower P/E (27.2x vs 118.3x)
- 3.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.7%
WELL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 35.8%, EPS growth -11.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.7%
- 230.2% 10Y total return vs PLD's 263.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.13, Low D/E 49.5%, current ratio 5.34x
- 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2%
PLD is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 36.7% margin vs VTR's 4.2%
VTR is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.01, yield 2.1%, current ratio 0.96x
- Beta 0.01 vs PLD's 0.73
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.8% FFO/revenue growth vs PLD's 2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.2x vs 118.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.7% margin vs VTR's 4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.01 vs PLD's 0.73 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs PLD's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs AMT's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs VTR's 1.0%, ROIC 6.9% vs 2.5% |
AMT vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMT vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMT leads in 3 of 6 categories
PLD leads 1 • WELL leads 1 • VTR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WELL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 1.9x VTR's $6.1B. PLD is the more profitable business, keeping 36.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VTR's 4.2%. On growth, WELL holds the edge at +40.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.8B | $11.6B | $8.7B | $6.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.9B | $2.8B | $6.7B | $2.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.9B | $1.4B | $3.2B | $260M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3.8B | $2.5B | $5.2B | $1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.4% | +39.1% | +67.7% | -4.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +4.4% | +47.0% | +13.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | +12.3% | +36.7% | +4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +34.9% | +21.9% | +59.3% | +22.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +40.3% | +8.7% | +22.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.9% | +22.5% | -24.1% | 0.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 33.0x trailing earnings, AMT trades at a 79% valuation discount to VTR's 160.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PLD offers better value at 3.24x vs AMT's 4.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $83.0B | $150.1B | $130.3B | $41.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $126.5B | $166.5B | $160.4B | $53.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.05x | 154.17x | 34.98x | 160.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.18x | 78.89x | 40.80x | 118.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.53x | — | 3.24x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.22x | 66.76x | 22.93x | 24.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.80x | 14.08x | 15.88x | 7.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 8.07x | 3.37x | 2.28x | 3.19x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 21.93x | 52.72x | 26.52x | 31.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMT delivers a 27.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $2 for VTR. WELL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMT's 4.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMT scores 7/9 vs PLD's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +27.4% | +3.5% | +5.6% | +2.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +2.3% | +3.3% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +0.5% | +3.8% | +2.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.6% | +0.6% | +4.8% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.34x | 0.49x | 0.54x | 1.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43.5B | $16.3B | $30.2B | $12.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.5B | $5.0B | $1.3B | $741M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45.0B | $21.4B | $31.5B | $13.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.99x | 0.26x | 5.27x | 1.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WELL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WELL five years ago would be worth $31,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,426 for AMT. Over the past 12 months, WELL leads with a +43.9% total return vs AMT's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WELL at 41.3% vs AMT's 0.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.9% | +15.0% | +9.5% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.4% | +43.9% | +37.1% | +33.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.7% | +182.2% | +19.3% | +93.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | +212.6% | +39.6% | +80.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.0% | +230.2% | +263.8% | +67.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +0.2% | +41.3% | +6.1% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMT and VTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLD's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. VTR currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs AMT's 76.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.04x | 0.13x | 0.73x | 0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $234.33 | $219.59 | $145.44 | $88.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $165.08 | $142.65 | $103.02 | $61.76 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.0% | +97.6% | +96.4% | +98.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 62.6 | 49.7 | 62.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 2.6M | 3.1M | 3.3M |
Analyst Outlook
AMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMT as "Buy", WELL as "Buy", PLD as "Buy", VTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.5% upside for AMT (target: $216) vs 3.0% for PLD (target: $144). For income investors, AMT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.78% vs WELL's 1.29%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $216.33 | $226.50 | $144.43 | $90.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 49 | 34 | 42 | 32 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.8% | +1.3% | +2.7% | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 11 | 2 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $6.73 | $2.76 | $3.74 | $1.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
AMT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). PLD leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
AMT vs WELL vs PLD vs VTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is the stronger pick with 35. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the better valuation at 33. 0x trailing P/E (27. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Tower Corporation (AMT) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR?
On trailing P/E, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the cheapest at 33.
0x versus Ventas, Inc. at 160. 7x. On forward P/E, American Tower Corporation is actually cheaper at 27. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Tower Corporation wins at 3. 72x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 77x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR?
Over the past 5 years, Welltower Inc.
(WELL) delivered a total return of +212. 6%, compared to -15. 7% for American Tower Corporation (AMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLD returned +263. 8% versus VTR's +67. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
04β versus Prologis, Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning PLD is approximately -2050% more volatile than AMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Welltower Inc. (WELL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 4% for American Tower Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Welltower Inc.
(WELL) is pulling ahead at 35. 8% versus 2. 2% for Prologis, Inc. (PLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ventas, Inc. grew EPS 184. 2% year-over-year, compared to -11. 5% for Welltower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, WELL leads at 22. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR?
Prologis, Inc.
(PLD) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 5% net margin versus 4. 3% for Ventas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLD leads at 53. 8% versus 3. 3% for WELL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLD leads at 74. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 72x versus Prologis, Inc. 's 3. 77x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, American Tower Corporation (AMT) trades at 27. 2x forward P/E versus 118. 3x for Ventas, Inc. — 91. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AMT: 21. 5% to $216. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
American Tower Corporation (AMT) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 1. 3% for Welltower Inc. (WELL).
09Is AMT or WELL or PLD or VTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, American Tower Corporation (AMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
04), 3. 8% yield, +113. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMT: +113. 0%, PLD: +263. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMT and WELL and PLD and VTR?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMT is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PLD is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VTR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.