Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs BUSE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
AMTB vs BUSE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $991M | $2.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $1.04B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $135M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 64.2% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 17.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 11.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $490M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $181M |
AMTB vs BUSE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| First Busey Corpora… (BUSE) | 100 | 151.4 | +51.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs BUSE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.7% vs BUSE's 3.1%
- +44.5% vs BUSE's +30.1%
BUSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 3.6%
- Rev growth 57.6%, EPS growth -25.8%
- 74.2% 10Y total return vs AMTB's 40.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs AMTB's 14.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs AMTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AMTB's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs BUSE's +30.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.5% vs AMTB's 0.5% |
AMTB vs BUSE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs BUSE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUSE leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BUSE is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 2.0x AMTB's $521M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 13.0% (BUSE) to 11.2% (AMTB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $220M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $135M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $172M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +64.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +17.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +13.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +16.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +28.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — AMTB and BUSE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.7x trailing earnings, AMTB trades at a 2% valuation discount to BUSE's 19.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BUSE's 13.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMTB's 22.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | 19.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 11.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | 13.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 2.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 13.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BUSE leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMTB delivers a 6.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $6 for BUSE. BUSE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMTB's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMTB scores 7/9 vs BUSE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $309M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $181M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $490M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BUSE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BUSE five years ago would be worth $13,375 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,272 for AMTB. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs BUSE's +30.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BUSE at 15.0% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +30.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +52.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +33.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +74.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
BUSE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BUSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $29.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $21.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +97.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 558K |
Analyst Outlook
BUSE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates AMTB as "Hold" and BUSE as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.7% upside for BUSE (target: $29) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, BUSE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.62% vs AMTB's 1.18%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +2.9% |
BUSE leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
AMTB vs BUSE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or BUSE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger pick with 57.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 0% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB). Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) offers the better valuation at 18. 7x trailing P/E (13. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or BUSE?
On trailing P/E, Amerant Bancorp Inc.
(AMTB) is the cheapest at 18. 7x versus First Busey Corporation at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, First Busey Corporation is actually cheaper at 11. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or BUSE?
Over the past 5 years, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) delivered a total return of +33.
8%, compared to +22. 7% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BUSE returned +74. 2% versus AMTB's +40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or BUSE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
74β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately 26% more volatile than BUSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 111% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or BUSE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is pulling ahead at 57.
6% versus 14. 0% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -25. 8% for First Busey Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or BUSE?
First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
0% net margin versus 8. 0% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BUSE leads at 17. 9% versus 10. 1% for AMTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BUSE leads at 63. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or BUSE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) trades at 11.
4x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BUSE: 2. 7% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or BUSE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Busey Corporation (BUSE) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).
09Is AMTB or BUSE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
74), 3. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BUSE: +74. 2%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and BUSE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BUSE is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.