Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $991M | $2.41B | $4.41B | $706M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $1.04B | $1.89B | $310M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $135M | $392M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 64.2% | 67.4% | 69.1% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 17.9% | 25.7% | 26.2% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 11.4x | 11.3x | 9.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $490M | $1.30B | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $181M | $271M | $52M |
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| First Busey Corpora… (BUSE) | 100 | 151.4 | +51.4% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 217.5 | +117.5% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 231.0 | +131.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs BUSE's 3.1%
- +44.5% vs IBCP's +16.5%
BUSE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth and dividends.
- 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3%
- 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0%
FULT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.81 vs IBCP's 1.83
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs AMTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs AMTB's 0.5%
IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 3.0%
- 186.7% 10Y total return vs FULT's 112.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.68, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 57.6% NII/revenue growth vs IBCP's -0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs AMTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs FULT's 0.94, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs IBCP's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs AMTB's 0.5% |
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 4 of 6 categories
AMTB leads 0 • BUSE leads 0 • FULT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 6.1x IBCP's $310M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AMTB's 11.2%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $1.0B | $1.9B | $310M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $220M | $529M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $135M | $392M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $172M | $267M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +64.2% | +67.4% | +69.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +17.9% | +25.7% | +26.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +13.0% | +20.7% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +16.5% | +14.1% | +22.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +28.6% | +47.2% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 45% valuation discount to BUSE's 19.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.79x vs IBCP's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $2.4B | $4.4B | $706M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $2.7B | $5.4B | $771M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | 19.20x | 11.01x | 10.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 11.44x | 11.30x | 9.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.79x | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | 13.30x | 10.26x | 9.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 2.31x | 2.33x | 2.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.02x | 1.20x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 13.89x | 15.50x | 10.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $6 for BUSE. BUSE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMTB's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs BUSE's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +5.7% | +11.6% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +5.8% | +7.5% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.3% | +9.5% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.20x | 0.37x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $309M | $1.0B | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $181M | $271M | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $490M | $1.3B | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.58x | 0.84x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $18,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,272 for AMTB. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs IBCP's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 28.6% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +20.3% | +18.6% | +8.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +30.1% | +38.2% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +52.1% | +98.3% | +112.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +33.8% | +70.1% | +85.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +74.2% | +112.4% | +186.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +15.0% | +25.6% | +28.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BUSE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BUSE currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.74x | 0.94x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $29.10 | $23.66 | $39.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $21.63 | $16.60 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +97.0% | +96.8% | +87.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 57.0 | 58.3 | 49.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 558K | 1.7M | 139K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BUSE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", BUSE as "Hold", FULT as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, BUSE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.62% vs AMTB's 1.18%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $29.00 | $23.50 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 11 | 20 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +3.6% | +3.4% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.02 | $0.77 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +2.9% | +1.5% | +1.8% |
IBCP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 2 categories are tied.
AMTB vs BUSE vs FULT vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is the stronger pick with 57.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus First Busey Corporation at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +85.
3%, compared to +22. 7% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +186. 7% versus AMTB's +40. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
68β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 0. 94β — meaning FULT is approximately 39% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Busey Corporation (BUSE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 111% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Busey Corporation (BUSE) is pulling ahead at 57.
6% versus -0. 3% for Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -25. 8% for First Busey Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus 8. 0% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBCP leads at 25. 8% versus 10. 1% for AMTB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBCP leads at 69. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 81x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 10. 8% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Busey Corporation (BUSE) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).
09Is AMTB or BUSE or FULT or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), 3. 0% yield, +186. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +186. 7%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and BUSE and FULT and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BUSE is a small-cap high-growth stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.