Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $991M | $706M | $3.18B | $2.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $310M | $618M | $819M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $58M | $69M | $-398M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 55.6% | 69.1% | 4.5% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.7% | 26.2% | -85.4% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.1x | 9.7x | 10.6x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $117M | $641M | $373M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $470M | $52M | $380M | $183M |
AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) | 100 | 156.9 | +56.9% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 231.0 | +131.0% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 128.0 | +28.0% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 170.6 | +70.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and bank quality is your priority.
- Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
- NIM 3.7% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- 14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
- +44.5% vs BANR's +7.4%
IBCP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 186.7% 10Y total return vs BANR's 100.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.68, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 13.1x)
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.9%
- 3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0%
BANR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.91 vs IBCP's 1.83
- Beta 0.66 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 13.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.9% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.5% vs BANR's +7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 2 of 6 categories
IBCP leads 2 • BANR leads 1 • AMTB leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BANR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BANR is the larger business by revenue, generating $819M annually — 2.6x IBCP's $310M. BANR is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $310M | $618M | $819M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $54M | $89M | -$444M | $253M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $58M | $69M | -$398M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $111M | $70M | $410M | $248M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.6% | +69.1% | +4.5% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.7% | +26.2% | -85.4% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +11.2% | +22.1% | -64.3% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +22.6% | +66.4% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +2.3% | +42.1% | +11.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 44% valuation discount to AMTB's 18.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 0.99x vs IBCP's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $991M | $706M | $3.2B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $771M | $3.4B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.73x | 10.49x | -7.42x | 11.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.13x | 9.66x | 10.61x | 10.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.99x | — | 0.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.07x | 9.48x | — | 9.45x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.51x | 2.24x | 5.07x | 2.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.42x | 0.86x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.12x | 10.07x | 7.52x | 8.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMTB's 1.11x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | +14.2% | -11.5% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.3% | -1.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.6% | +10.2% | -9.1% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.6% | -4.2% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.11x | 0.23x | 0.19x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $571M | $65M | $261M | $190M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $470M | $52M | $380M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $117M | $641M | $373M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.29x | 0.91x | -1.01x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $18,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,147 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs BANR's +7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 28.6% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +8.3% | +18.7% | +5.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.5% | +16.5% | +25.0% | +7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.9% | +112.6% | +34.8% | +53.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +22.7% | +85.3% | -8.5% | +40.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.4% | +186.7% | +25.0% | +100.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +28.6% | +10.5% | +15.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SFNC and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.93x | 0.68x | 0.84x | 0.65x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.38 | $39.16 | $22.62 | $69.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.62 | $29.63 | $17.00 | $57.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.8% | +87.6% | +96.8% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 49.3 | 52.8 | 48.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 139K | 1.1M | 223K |
Analyst Outlook
SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 10.8% upside for IBCP (target: $38) vs -0.9% for BANR (target: $64). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.90% vs AMTB's 1.18%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $38.00 | $23.00 | $64.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 7 | 9 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +3.0% | +3.9% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 | 14 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.28 | $1.03 | $0.85 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.0% | +1.8% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
SFNC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). IBCP leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
AMTB vs IBCP vs SFNC vs BANR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amerant Bancorp Inc.
(AMTB) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
5x versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. at 18. 7x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 91x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 83x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +85.
3%, compared to -8. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +186. 7% versus SFNC's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
65β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately 43% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 111% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amerant Bancorp Inc.
(AMTB) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR?
Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
8% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BANR leads at 29. 5% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 91x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 83x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 1x for Amerant Bancorp Inc. — 3. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IBCP: 10. 8% to $38. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).
09Is AMTB or IBCP or SFNC or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
68), 3. 0% yield, +186. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +186. 7%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between AMTB and IBCP and SFNC and BANR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.