Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
AMTB logo
AMTB
SFNC logo
SFNC
IBCP logo
IBCP
CVBF logo
CVBF
JPM logo
JPM
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

AMTB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs CVBF vs JPM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
AMTB
Amerant Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$991M
5Y Perf.+56.9%
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.18B
5Y Perf.+28.0%
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$706M
5Y Perf.+131.0%
CVBF
CVB Financial Corp.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+11.0%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+245.8%

AMTB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs CVBF vs JPM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
AMTB logoAMTB
SFNC logoSFNC
IBCP logoIBCP
CVBF logoCVBF
JPM logoJPM
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$991M$3.18B$706M$2.83B$908.57B
Revenue (TTM)$521M$618M$310M$644M$280.33B
Net Income (TTM)$58M$-398M$69M$209M$57.05B
Gross Margin55.6%4.5%69.1%79.7%60.0%
Operating Margin9.7%-85.4%26.2%43.7%25.9%
Forward P/E13.1x10.6x9.7x14.5x14.6x
Total Debt$1.04B$641M$117M$991M$942.38B
Cash & Equiv.$470M$380M$52M$108M$343.34B

AMTB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs CVBF vs JPMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

AMTB
SFNC
IBCP
CVBF
JPM
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB)100156.9+56.9%
Simmons First Natio… (SFNC)100128.0+28.0%
Independent Bank Co… (IBCP)100231.0+131.0%
CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF)100111.0+11.0%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100345.8+245.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: AMTB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs CVBF vs JPM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AMTB and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SFNC, IBCP, and CVBF also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
AMTB
Amerant Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

AMTB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and bank quality.

  • Rev growth 14.0%, EPS growth 386.4%
  • NIM 3.7% vs JPM's 2.2%
  • 14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
  • +44.5% vs IBCP's +16.5%
Best for: growth exposure and bank quality
SFNC
Simmons First National Corporation
The Banking Pick

SFNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 3.9%
  • Lower P/E (10.6x vs 14.5x)
Best for: income & stability
IBCP
Independent Bank Corporation
The Banking Pick

IBCP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.68, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
  • Beta 0.68 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CVBF
CVB Financial Corp.
The Banking Pick

CVBF is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.

  • 3.9% yield, vs JPM's 1.8%
Best for: dividends
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • 481.2% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 186.7%
  • PEG 0.83 vs CVBF's 4.55
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
Best for: long-term compounding and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthAMTB logoAMTB14.0% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
ValueSFNC logoSFNCLower P/E (10.6x vs 14.5x)
Quality / MarginsJPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyIBCP logoIBCPBeta 0.68 vs AMTB's 0.93, lower leverage
DividendsCVBF logoCVBF3.9% yield, vs JPM's 1.8%
Momentum (1Y)AMTB logoAMTB+44.5% vs IBCP's +16.5%
Efficiency (ROA)JPM logoJPMEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%

AMTB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs CVBF vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

AMTBAmerant Bancorp Inc.
FY 2018
Corporate LATAM
100.0%$1.0B
SFNCSimmons First National Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
36.8%$51M
Fiduciary and Trust
28.5%$39M
Credit and Debit Card
24.7%$34M
Mortgage Loans
5.9%$8M
Financial Service, Other
4.1%$6M
IBCPIndependent Bank Corporation
FY 2021
Interchange Income
32.5%$14M
Service Charges on Deposits
23.5%$10M
Overdraft Fees
19.5%$8M
Investment and Insurance Commissions
6.0%$3M
Other Deposit Related Income
5.3%$2M
Asset Management Revenue
3.9%$2M
Account Service Charges
2.6%$1M
Other (3)
6.6%$3M
CVBFCVB Financial Corp.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
52.3%$19M
Fiduciary and Trust
40.4%$15M
Credit Card
7.3%$3M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000

AMTB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs CVBF vs JPM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSFNCLAGGINGAMTB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 904.8x IBCP's $310M. CVBF is the more profitable business, keeping 32.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -64.3%.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$521M$618M$310M$644M$280.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$54M-$444M$89M$294M$81.4B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$58M-$398M$69M$209M$57.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$111M$410M$70M$217M$100.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.6%+4.5%+69.1%+79.7%+60.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+9.7%-85.4%+26.2%+43.7%+25.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+11.2%-64.3%+22.1%+32.5%+20.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+21.4%+66.4%+22.6%+33.7%+36.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+57.1%+42.1%+2.3%+11.1%+16.0%
CVBF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.5x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 44% valuation discount to AMTB's 18.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 0.92x vs CVBF's 4.31x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Market CapShares × price$991M$3.2B$706M$2.8B$908.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.6B$3.4B$771M$3.7B$1.51T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.73x-7.42x10.49x13.69x16.22x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.13x10.61x9.66x14.45x14.60x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.99x4.31x0.92x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple22.07x9.48x13.17x18.52x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.51x5.07x2.24x4.39x3.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.03x0.86x1.42x1.23x2.51x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF10.12x7.52x10.07x13.00x9.01x
SFNC leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

JPM delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-11 for SFNC. SFNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%-11.5%+14.2%+9.3%+15.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.7%-1.6%+1.3%+1.4%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.6%-9.1%+10.2%+6.8%+4.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.2%-4.2%+2.6%+9.3%+8.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–974865
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.11x0.19x0.23x0.43x2.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$571M$261M$65M$883M$599.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$470M$380M$52M$108M$343.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.0B$641M$117M$991M$942.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.29x-1.01x0.91x2.12x0.74x
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $23,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,147 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, AMTB leads with a +44.5% total return vs IBCP's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs AMTB's 8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+20.6%+18.7%+8.3%+12.5%+0.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+44.5%+25.0%+16.5%+17.6%+20.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+28.9%+34.8%+112.6%+62.1%+138.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+22.7%-8.5%+85.3%+19.8%+135.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+40.4%+25.0%+186.7%+66.1%+481.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.8%+10.5%+28.6%+17.5%+33.7%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SFNC and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMTB's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs IBCP's 87.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.93x0.84x0.68x0.79x0.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.38$22.62$39.16$21.63$338.09
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.62$17.00$29.63$17.95$269.72
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.8%+96.8%+87.6%+96.2%+96.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.452.849.350.772.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded226K1.1M139K1.7M7.4M
Evenly matched — SFNC and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CVBF and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: AMTB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", IBCP as "Hold", CVBF as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.9% upside for CVBF (target: $25) vs 1.7% for AMTB (target: $24). For income investors, CVBF offers the higher dividend yield at 3.92% vs AMTB's 1.18%.

MetricAMTB logoAMTBAmerant Bancorp I…SFNC logoSFNCSimmons First Nat…IBCP logoIBCPIndependent Bank …CVBF logoCVBFCVB Financial Cor…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$23.00$38.00$24.75$339.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts7971661
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%+3.9%+3.0%+3.9%+1.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01411015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.28$0.85$1.03$0.82$5.95
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.0%0.0%+1.8%+2.9%+3.8%
Evenly matched — CVBF and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CVBF leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallSimmons First National Corp… (SFNC)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

AMTB vs SFNC vs IBCP vs CVBF vs JPM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Amerant Bancorp Inc.

(AMTB) is the stronger pick with 14. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM?

On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.

5x versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. at 18. 7x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 0. 83x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +135. 5%, compared to -8. 5% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus SFNC's +25. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

68β versus Amerant Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning AMTB is approximately 38% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amerant Bancorp Inc.

(AMTB) is pulling ahead at 14. 0% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amerant Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 386. 4% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM?

CVB Financial Corp.

(CVBF) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 5% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 32. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVBF leads at 43. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CVBF leads at 79. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 83x versus CVB Financial Corp. 's 4. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 6x for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CVBF: 18. 9% to $24. 75.

08

Which pays a better dividend — AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

CVB Financial Corp. (CVBF) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 1. 2% for Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB).

09

Is AMTB or SFNC or IBCP or CVBF or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 87), 1. 8% yield, +481. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JPM: +481. 2%, AMTB: +40. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between AMTB and SFNC and IBCP and CVBF and JPM?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: AMTB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CVBF is a small-cap deep-value stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.