Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMTD vs BABA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
AMTD vs BABA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $8M | $319.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $1.01T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $123.35B |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 41.2% |
| Operating Margin | 48.2% | 10.9% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 3.9x |
| Total Debt | $283M | $248.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $181.73B |
AMTD vs BABA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| Alibaba Group Holdi… (BABA) | 100 | 63.8 | -36.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTD vs BABA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 36.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 10.62x
- Beta 0.06, yield 36.4%, current ratio 10.62x
BABA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 70.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 73.6% 10Y total return vs AMTD's -91.4%
- 5.9% revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 3.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.4% margin vs BABA's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs BABA's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 36.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BABA's 1.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.1% vs AMTD's +6.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs BABA's 6.7%, ROIC 1.2% vs 9.6% |
AMTD vs BABA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTD vs BABA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMTD leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BABA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.01T annually — 18718.2x AMTD's $54M. AMTD is the more profitable business, keeping 94.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BABA's 12.2%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $1.01T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $263M | $114.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | $123.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +41.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +10.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +94.4% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +4.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.3% | -52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
AMTD leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to BABA's 16.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMTD's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BABA's 12.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $319.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $228M | $329.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.25x | 16.84x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 3.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.94x | 12.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 2.19x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 2.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.46x | 27.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMTD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMTD delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $11 for BABA. AMTD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BABA's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BABA scores 7/9 vs AMTD's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +9.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +10.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $221M | $66.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $181.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $283M | $248.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.18x | 15.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BABA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BABA five years ago would be worth $6,035 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $260 for AMTD. Over the past 12 months, BABA leads with a +6.1% total return vs AMTD's +6.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BABA at 18.0% vs AMTD's -40.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -15.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | +6.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.8% | +64.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -39.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | +73.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.4% | +18.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AMTD and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMTD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BABA's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BABA currently trades 68.6% from its 52-week high vs AMTD's 64.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.65 | $192.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $103.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.2% | +68.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 51.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 10.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AMTD and BABA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, AMTD offers the higher dividend yield at 36.35% vs BABA's 1.34%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $194.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 59 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +36.4% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | $12.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.0% |
AMTD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BABA leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
AMTD vs BABA: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTD or BABA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is the stronger pick with 5.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) a "Buy" — based on 59 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTD or BABA?
On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited at 16. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTD or BABA?
Over the past 5 years, Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) delivered a total return of -39.
6%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BABA returned +73. 6% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTD or BABA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus Alibaba Group Holding Limited's 1. 21β — meaning BABA is approximately 1814% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 23% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTD or BABA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) is pulling ahead at 5.
9% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alibaba Group Holding Limited grew EPS 70. 9% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTD or BABA?
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.
4% net margin versus 13. 1% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTD leads at 48. 2% versus 14. 1% for BABA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMTD leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — AMTD or BABA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the highest yield at 36. 4%, versus 1. 3% for Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA).
08Is AMTD or BABA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 36. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMTD: -91. 4%, BABA: +73. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AMTD and BABA?
These companies operate in different sectors (AMTD (Financial Services) and BABA (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.