Asset Management
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
AMTD vs TIGR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
AMTD vs TIGR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $8M | $650M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $54M | $392M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $188M | $118M |
| Gross Margin | 45.2% | 65.0% |
| Operating Margin | 48.2% | 35.6% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $283M | $180M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $63M | $394M |
AMTD vs TIGR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) | 100 | 2.7 | -97.3% |
| UP Fintech Holding … (TIGR) | 100 | 200.0 | +100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: AMTD vs TIGR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
AMTD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 36.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 10.62x
- Beta 0.06, yield 36.4%, current ratio 10.62x
TIGR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.7%, EPS growth 71.4%
- -37.8% 10Y total return vs AMTD's -91.4%
- 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.7% NII/revenue growth vs AMTD's -55.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 7.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 94.4% margin vs TIGR's 15.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs TIGR's 2.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 36.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +6.0% vs TIGR's -25.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.8% ROA vs TIGR's 1.6%, ROIC 1.2% vs 13.8% |
AMTD vs TIGR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
AMTD vs TIGR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TIGR is the larger business by revenue, generating $392M annually — 7.2x AMTD's $54M. AMTD is the more profitable business, keeping 94.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TIGR's 15.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $54M | $392M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $263M | $225M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $188M | $118M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $45M | $673M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.2% | +65.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +35.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +94.4% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -88.3% | +12.4% |
Valuation Metrics
AMTD leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.3x trailing earnings, AMTD trades at a 99% valuation discount to TIGR's 18.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TIGR's 2.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMTD's 6.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $650M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $228M | $436M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.25x | 18.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.94x | 2.95x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 1.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.46x | 0.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TIGR delivers a 17.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $13 for AMTD. AMTD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TIGR's 0.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TIGR scores 6/9 vs AMTD's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.9% | +17.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.8% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.2% | +13.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +18.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.17x | 0.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $221M | -$214M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $63M | $394M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $283M | $180M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 17.18x | 3.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TIGR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TIGR five years ago would be worth $3,585 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $260 for AMTD. Over the past 12 months, AMTD leads with a +6.0% total return vs TIGR's -25.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TIGR at 32.4% vs AMTD's -40.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.9% | -36.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.0% | -25.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.8% | +132.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.4% | -64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.4% | -37.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.4% | +32.4% |
Risk & Volatility
AMTD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMTD is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TIGR's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMTD currently trades 64.2% from its 52-week high vs TIGR's 49.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 2.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.65 | $13.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $5.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.2% | +49.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.3 | 47.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
AMTD is the only dividend payer here at 36.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Sell |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.73 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +36.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.39 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TIGR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMTD leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
AMTD vs TIGR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is AMTD or TIGR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is the stronger pick with 43. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) a "Sell" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — AMTD or TIGR?
On trailing P/E, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the cheapest at 0.
3x versus UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A at 18. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — AMTD or TIGR?
Over the past 5 years, UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) delivered a total return of -64. 2%, compared to -97. 4% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TIGR returned -37. 8% versus AMTD's -91. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — AMTD or TIGR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
06β versus UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A's 2. 02β — meaning TIGR is approximately 3099% more volatile than AMTD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 27% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — AMTD or TIGR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), UP Fintech Holding Ltd.
Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) is pulling ahead at 43. 7% versus -55. 9% for AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A grew EPS 71. 4% year-over-year, compared to -68. 5% for AMTD IDEA Group. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — AMTD or TIGR?
AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the more profitable company, earning 94.
4% net margin versus 15. 5% for UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A — meaning it keeps 94. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMTD leads at 48. 2% versus 35. 6% for TIGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TIGR leads at 65. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — AMTD or TIGR?
In this comparison, AMTD (36.
4% yield) pays a dividend. TIGR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is AMTD or TIGR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AMTD IDEA Group (AMTD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 36. 4% yield). UP Fintech Holding Ltd. Sponsored ADR Class A (TIGR) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMTD: -91. 4%, TIGR: -37. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between AMTD and TIGR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: AMTD is a small-cap deep-value stock; TIGR is a small-cap high-growth stock. AMTD pays a dividend while TIGR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.