Food Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ANDE vs VITL vs INGR vs FRPT vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
ANDE vs VITL vs INGR vs FRPT vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Food Distribution | Agricultural Farm Products | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $2.41B | $426M | $6.77B | $2.74B | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.98B | $784M | $7.22B | $1.14B | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $129M | $48M | $729M | $200M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 6.6% | 35.2% | 25.3% | 38.9% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.1% | 8.2% | 14.1% | 8.8% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.5x | 10.4x | 9.6x | 41.1x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $1.04B | $53M | $1.79B | $560M | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $98M | $49M | $1.03B | $278M | $98M |
ANDE vs VITL vs INGR vs FRPT vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) | 100 | 498.0 | +398.0% |
| Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) | 100 | 27.0 | -73.0% |
| Ingredion Incorpora… (INGR) | 100 | 124.2 | +24.2% |
| Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT) | 100 | 58.2 | -41.8% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 51.7 | -48.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ANDE vs VITL vs INGR vs FRPT vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ANDE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 192.1% 10Y total return vs INGR's 13.5%
- PEG 0.22 vs INGR's 0.57
- +127.2% vs VITL's -73.5%
VITL is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 25.3%, EPS growth 22.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.0%
- 25.3% revenue growth vs INGR's -2.8%
INGR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.25, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 41.0%, current ratio 2.66x
- Beta 0.25, yield 3.0%, current ratio 2.66x
- Beta 0.25 vs FRPT's 0.91, lower leverage
FRPT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 17.6% margin vs ANDE's 1.2%
- 11.4% ROA vs ANDE's 3.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 4.6%
SMPL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 41.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.3% revenue growth vs INGR's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 41.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs ANDE's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs FRPT's 0.91, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs ANDE's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.2% vs VITL's -73.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs ANDE's 3.6%, ROIC 5.3% vs 4.6% |
ANDE vs VITL vs INGR vs FRPT vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ANDE vs VITL vs INGR vs FRPT vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories
VITL leads 1 • ANDE leads 1 • INGR leads 0 • SMPL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FRPT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANDE is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.0B annually — 14.0x VITL's $784M. FRPT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ANDE's 1.2%. On growth, VITL holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.0B | $784M | $7.2B | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | $78M | $1.2B | $165M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $129M | $48M | $729M | $200M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | -$90M | $809M | $223M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.6% | +35.2% | +25.3% | +38.9% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | +8.2% | +14.1% | +8.8% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +6.1% | +10.1% | +17.6% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | -11.4% | +11.2% | +19.6% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.2% | +15.4% | -2.4% | +13.1% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +96.0% | -108.1% | +79.0% | +4.5% | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — VITL and SMPL each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.6x trailing earnings, VITL trades at a 74% valuation discount to ANDE's 25.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), VITL offers better value at 0.17x vs INGR's 0.57x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $426M | $6.8B | $2.7B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $431M | $7.5B | $3.0B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.29x | 6.61x | 9.61x | 21.16x | 12.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.50x | 10.38x | 9.56x | 41.11x | 7.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | 0.17x | 0.57x | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.82x | 4.22x | 5.98x | 16.62x | 5.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.22x | 0.56x | 0.94x | 2.49x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.88x | 1.25x | 1.60x | 2.59x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 13.25x | 221.45x | 7.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
VITL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INGR delivers a 17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $5 for SMPL. VITL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ANDE's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INGR scores 8/9 vs VITL's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +14.5% | +17.1% | +17.0% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.6% | +10.0% | +9.4% | +11.4% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +26.9% | +15.5% | +5.3% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +26.1% | +16.3% | +6.0% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.15x | 0.41x | 0.46x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $945M | $5M | $760M | $282M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $98M | $49M | $1.0B | $278M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $53M | $1.8B | $560M | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.21x | 39.83x | 27.32x | 13.29x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANDE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANDE five years ago would be worth $24,161 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,165 for FRPT. Over the past 12 months, ANDE leads with a +127.2% total return vs VITL's -73.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANDE at 25.4% vs SMPL's -31.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +34.2% | -68.1% | -0.7% | -7.1% | -36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +127.2% | -73.5% | -18.4% | -31.1% | -64.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.0% | -38.2% | +7.9% | -17.4% | -67.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +141.6% | -54.4% | +28.8% | -68.4% | -64.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +192.1% | -73.0% | +13.5% | +517.3% | +3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.4% | -14.8% | +2.6% | -6.2% | -31.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ANDE and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INGR is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FRPT's 0.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ANDE currently trades 86.2% from its 52-week high vs VITL's 17.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.55x | 0.31x | 0.25x | 0.91x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.11 | $53.13 | $141.78 | $89.80 | $36.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.03 | $8.40 | $100.71 | $46.76 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +17.9% | +75.8% | +62.2% | +33.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.0 | 38.9 | 27.3 | 29.1 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 333K | 3.3M | 585K | 1.5M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ANDE and INGR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ANDE as "Buy", VITL as "Buy", INGR as "Hold", FRPT as "Buy", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 316.3% upside for VITL (target: $40) vs 5.9% for ANDE (target: $75). For income investors, INGR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.01% vs ANDE's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $75.00 | $39.63 | $124.25 | $73.42 | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 15 | 21 | 29 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | — | +3.0% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 23 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | — | $3.24 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% | +3.3% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
FRPT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). VITL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
ANDE vs VITL vs INGR vs FRPT vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the stronger pick with 25. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) offers the better valuation at 6. 6x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL?
On trailing P/E, Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is the cheapest at 6. 6x versus The Andersons, Inc. at 25. 3x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Andersons, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Ingredion Incorporated's 0. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) delivered a total return of +141. 6%, compared to -68. 4% for Freshpet, Inc. (FRPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FRPT returned +517. 3% versus VITL's -73. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
25β versus Freshpet, Inc. 's 0. 91β — meaning FRPT is approximately 261% more volatile than INGR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Vital Farms, Inc. (VITL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 81% for The Andersons, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Vital Farms, Inc.
(VITL) is pulling ahead at 25. 3% versus -2. 8% for Ingredion Incorporated (INGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Freshpet, Inc. grew EPS 183. 9% year-over-year, compared to -26. 1% for The Simply Good Foods Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, VITL leads at 28. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL?
Freshpet, Inc.
(FRPT) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 6% net margin versus 0. 9% for The Andersons, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus 1. 2% for ANDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FRPT leads at 38. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Ingredion Incorporated's 0. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 41. 1x for Freshpet, Inc. — 33. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VITL: 316. 3% to $39. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL?
In this comparison, INGR (3.
0% yield), ANDE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. VITL, FRPT, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ANDE or VITL or INGR or FRPT or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ingredion Incorporated (INGR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
25), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INGR: +13. 5%, FRPT: +517. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ANDE and VITL and INGR and FRPT and SMPL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ANDE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VITL is a small-cap high-growth stock; INGR is a small-cap deep-value stock; FRPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. ANDE, INGR pay a dividend while VITL, FRPT, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.