Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

ANET vs NTGR vs CSCO vs CALX vs MRVL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$178.49B
5Y Perf.+871.6%
NTGR
NETGEAR, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$708M
5Y Perf.+0.6%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$364.95B
5Y Perf.+92.7%
CALX
Calix, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.81B
5Y Perf.+208.7%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$138.57B
5Y Perf.+390.5%

ANET vs NTGR vs CSCO vs CALX vs MRVL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
ANET logoANET
NTGR logoNTGR
CSCO logoCSCO
CALX logoCALX
MRVL logoMRVL
IndustryComputer HardwareCommunication EquipmentCommunication EquipmentSoftware - ApplicationSemiconductors
Market Cap$178.49B$708M$364.95B$2.81B$138.57B
Revenue (TTM)$9.71B$690M$59.05B$1.06B$8.19B
Net Income (TTM)$3.72B$-40M$11.08B$34M$2.67B
Gross Margin63.5%37.5%64.4%57.1%51.0%
Operating Margin42.8%-4.4%23.0%3.8%16.1%
Forward P/E40.0x129.4x22.2x24.5x41.7x
Total Debt$0.00$51M$29.64B$26M$4.47B
Cash & Equiv.$1.96B$210M$9.47B$143M$2.64B

ANET vs NTGR vs CSCO vs CALX vs MRVLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

ANET
NTGR
CSCO
CALX
MRVL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Arista Networks, In… (ANET)100971.6+871.6%
NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR)100100.6+0.6%
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)100192.7+92.7%
Calix, Inc. (CALX)100308.7+208.7%
Marvell Technology,… (MRVL)100490.5+390.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: ANET vs NTGR vs CSCO vs CALX vs MRVL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CSCO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Arista Networks, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. MRVL also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
ANET
Arista Networks, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

ANET is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 33.7% 10Y total return vs MRVL's 15.8%
  • 38.3% margin vs NTGR's -5.8%
  • 19.7% ROA vs NTGR's -4.9%, ROIC 32.8% vs -8.4%
Best for: long-term compounding
NTGR
NETGEAR, Inc.
The Technology Pick

NTGR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

CSCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 1.7%
  • Beta 0.92, yield 1.7%, current ratio 1.00x
  • Lower P/E (22.2x vs 41.7x)
  • Beta 0.92 vs MRVL's 2.21
Best for: income & stability and defensive
CALX
Calix, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CALX is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 3.0%, current ratio 4.24x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
The Growth Play

MRVL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 42.1%, EPS growth 401.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.4%
  • 42.1% revenue growth vs NTGR's 2.9%
  • +184.6% vs NTGR's -9.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthMRVL logoMRVL42.1% revenue growth vs NTGR's 2.9%
ValueCSCO logoCSCOLower P/E (22.2x vs 41.7x)
Quality / MarginsANET logoANET38.3% margin vs NTGR's -5.8%
Stability / SafetyCSCO logoCSCOBeta 0.92 vs MRVL's 2.21
DividendsCSCO logoCSCO1.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs MRVL's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)MRVL logoMRVL+184.6% vs NTGR's -9.7%
Efficiency (ROA)ANET logoANET19.7% ROA vs NTGR's -4.9%, ROIC 32.8% vs -8.4%

ANET vs NTGR vs CSCO vs CALX vs MRVL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

ANETArista Networks, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
84.1%$7.6B
Service
15.9%$1.4B
NTGRNETGEAR, Inc.
FY 2025
Consumer
51.1%$358M
Enterprise
48.9%$342M
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Networking
44.5%$28.3B
Service
34.5%$22.0B
Security
12.7%$8.1B
Collaboration
6.5%$4.2B
Observability
1.7%$1.1B
CALXCalix, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$1.0B
MRVLMarvell Technology, Inc.
FY 2025
Data Center
72.2%$4.2B
Enterprise Networking
10.9%$626M
Carrier Infrastructure
5.9%$338M
Automotive And Industrial
5.6%$322M
Consumer
5.5%$316M

ANET vs NTGR vs CSCO vs CALX vs MRVL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLANETLAGGINGMRVL

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

CSCO is the larger business by revenue, generating $59.1B annually — 85.6x NTGR's $690M. ANET is the more profitable business, keeping 38.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NTGR's -5.8%. On growth, ANET holds the edge at +35.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricANET logoANETArista Networks, …NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$9.7B$690M$59.1B$1.1B$8.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4.2B-$19M$16.1B$57M$2.3B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$3.7B-$40M$11.1B$34M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5.3B-$11M$12.8B$109M$1.4B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+63.5%+37.5%+64.4%+57.1%+51.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+42.8%-4.4%+23.0%+3.8%+16.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+38.3%-5.8%+18.8%+3.2%+32.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+54.4%-1.6%+21.8%+10.3%+17.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+35.1%-2.0%+9.7%+27.1%+22.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+25.0%-123.8%+29.5%+3.3%+100.0%
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NTGR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 36.1x trailing earnings, CSCO trades at a 78% valuation discount to CALX's 167.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CSCO's 26.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRVL's 106.1x.

MetricANET logoANETArista Networks, …NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…
Market CapShares × price$178.5B$708M$365.0B$2.8B$138.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$176.5B$549M$385.1B$2.7B$140.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS51.55x-22.71x36.14x167.38x52.12x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.40.02x129.45x22.18x24.49x41.72x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.27x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple44.93x26.34x69.62x106.14x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue19.82x1.02x6.44x2.81x16.91x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.62x1.50x7.87x3.57x9.73x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF41.97x27.46x24.34x99.24x
NTGR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ANET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

ANET delivers a 30.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-8 for NTGR. CALX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSCO's 0.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs ANET's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricANET logoANETArista Networks, …NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+30.6%-8.0%+23.2%+4.2%+19.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+19.7%-4.9%+9.0%+3.5%+12.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+32.8%-8.4%+13.0%+2.1%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+30.4%-6.0%+13.7%+2.5%+7.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945867
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.10x0.63x0.03x0.31x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$2.0B-$159M$20.2B-$118M$1.8B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.0B$210M$9.5B$143M$2.6B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$51M$29.6B$26M$4.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense9.64x15.17x
ANET leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in ANET five years ago would be worth $69,045 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,704 for NTGR. Over the past 12 months, MRVL leads with a +184.6% total return vs NTGR's -9.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANET at 60.1% vs CALX's 0.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricANET logoANETArista Networks, …NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+6.1%+6.5%+22.3%-18.8%+79.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+64.0%-9.7%+57.5%+3.3%+184.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+310.6%+86.5%+109.3%+2.1%+291.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+590.5%-33.0%+87.2%-9.3%+250.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3374.3%-37.7%+301.7%+513.0%+1581.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+60.1%+23.1%+27.9%+0.7%+57.7%
ANET leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CSCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.92 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MRVL's 2.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSCO currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs CALX's 61.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricANET logoANETArista Networks, …NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.15x1.39x0.92x0.99x2.21x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$179.80$36.86$94.72$71.22$175.79
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$82.80$19.00$59.07$40.75$53.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+78.8%+70.2%+97.3%+61.1%+91.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.456.163.943.378.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.3M515K18.9M918K24.8M
CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: ANET as "Buy", NTGR as "Hold", CSCO as "Buy", CALX as "Buy", MRVL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 40.2% upside for CALX (target: $61) vs -19.1% for MRVL (target: $130). For income investors, CSCO offers the higher dividend yield at 1.75% vs MRVL's 0.15%.

MetricANET logoANETArista Networks, …NTGR logoNTGRNETGEAR, Inc.CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…CALX logoCALXCalix, Inc.MRVL logoMRVLMarvell Technolog…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$186.25$36.00$96.50$61.00$129.52
# AnalystsCovering analysts5117732172
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.7%+0.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1510
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.61$0.24
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.9%+7.2%+2.0%+3.3%+1.5%
CSCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

ANET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CSCO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallArista Networks, Inc. (ANET)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

ANET vs NTGR vs CSCO vs CALX vs MRVL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Marvell Technology, Inc.

(MRVL) is the stronger pick with 42. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 9% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) offers the better valuation at 36. 1x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL?

On trailing P/E, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the cheapest at 36. 1x versus Calix, Inc. at 167. 4x. On forward P/E, Cisco Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL?

Over the past 5 years, Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) delivered a total return of +590. 5%, compared to -33. 0% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANET returned +33. 7% versus NTGR's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 92β versus Marvell Technology, Inc. 's 2. 21β — meaning MRVL is approximately 140% more volatile than CSCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Calix, Inc. (CALX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 63% for Cisco Systems, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Marvell Technology, Inc.

(MRVL) is pulling ahead at 42. 1% versus 2. 9% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Marvell Technology, Inc. grew EPS 401. 0% year-over-year, compared to -371. 4% for NETGEAR, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANET leads at 27. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL?

Arista Networks, Inc.

(ANET) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 0% net margin versus -4. 7% for NETGEAR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANET leads at 42. 8% versus -5. 1% for NTGR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CSCO leads at 64. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) trades at 22. 2x forward P/E versus 129. 4x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 107. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CALX: 40. 2% to $61. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL?

In this comparison, CSCO (1.

7% yield), MRVL (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. ANET, NTGR, CALX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is ANET or NTGR or CSCO or CALX or MRVL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), 1. 7% yield, +301. 7% 10Y return). Arista Networks, Inc. (ANET) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CSCO: +301. 7%, ANET: +33. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between ANET and NTGR and CSCO and CALX and MRVL?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: ANET is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CALX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MRVL is a mid-cap high-growth stock. CSCO pays a dividend while ANET, NTGR, CALX, MRVL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

ANET

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 17%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NTGR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CSCO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CALX

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MRVL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform ANET and NTGR and CSCO and CALX and MRVL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(ANET: 35.1% · NTGR: -2.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.